Productivity and Morpho-phenological Characters of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] as Influenced by Crop Geometry and Nipping Practice

S. A. Fanish, P.S. Shanmugam, S. Geetha
{"title":"Productivity and Morpho-phenological Characters of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] as Influenced by Crop Geometry and Nipping Practice","authors":"S. A. Fanish, P.S. Shanmugam, S. Geetha","doi":"10.18805/lr-5138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the possible agronomic ways for increasing productivity of pigeonpea is adoption of suitable crop geometry with nipping practices for getting suitable crop architecture for optimum utilization of resources. This investigation was planned to study the influence of crop geometry and nipping practices on production potential of pigeonpea. Methods: The field experiment was conducted at experimental farm of the Department of Pulses, TNAU, Coimbatore, during kharif season of 2021 and 2022. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with each four main and sub plot treatments. The main plot treatments comprised of four crop geometries while thesub plot treatments were nipping practices which includes no nipping, mechanical nipping and chemical nipping. Result: Various crop geometries shown remarkable effect on growth and development of pigeonpea. The crop geometry of 90 cm ´ 30 cm and 90 cm ´ 45 cm recorded maximum plant height of pigeonpea as compared to other wider crop geometries. While in case of all the other growth attributes viz. number of functional leaves per plant, leaf area, number of branches per plant and dry matter accumulation per plant crop geometry of 120 cm ´ 45 cm and 120 cm ´ 30 cm were found superior as compared to othertreatments and were at par with each other. The yield per hectare was increased at wider crop geometry 120 cm 45 cm as the higher per plant yield was compensated by lesser plant population. The crop geometry 120 cm ´ 45 cm produced significantly higher seed yield (1187, 1275 and 1231 kg ha-1 during 2021, 2022 and pooled mean respectively) over crop geometry of 90 cm ´ 30 cm and crop geometry 90 cm ´ 45 cm, but it was found at par with crop geometry 120 cm ´ 30 cm. Among the nipping practices, growth characters viz., plant height, number of functional leaves, leaf area, number of branches and dry matter accumulation per plant as well as phenological characters were enhanced with the foliar application of chlormequat chloride @500 ppm during both the years of study. Foliar application of chlormequat chloride @ 500 ppm also recorded significantly highest seed yield (1152, 1237and 1195 kg ha-1 during 2021, 2022 and in pooled data, respectively), while it was at par with foliar application of mepiquat chloride @ 500 ppm.\n","PeriodicalId":17998,"journal":{"name":"LEGUME RESEARCH - AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEGUME RESEARCH - AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18805/lr-5138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the possible agronomic ways for increasing productivity of pigeonpea is adoption of suitable crop geometry with nipping practices for getting suitable crop architecture for optimum utilization of resources. This investigation was planned to study the influence of crop geometry and nipping practices on production potential of pigeonpea. Methods: The field experiment was conducted at experimental farm of the Department of Pulses, TNAU, Coimbatore, during kharif season of 2021 and 2022. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with each four main and sub plot treatments. The main plot treatments comprised of four crop geometries while thesub plot treatments were nipping practices which includes no nipping, mechanical nipping and chemical nipping. Result: Various crop geometries shown remarkable effect on growth and development of pigeonpea. The crop geometry of 90 cm ´ 30 cm and 90 cm ´ 45 cm recorded maximum plant height of pigeonpea as compared to other wider crop geometries. While in case of all the other growth attributes viz. number of functional leaves per plant, leaf area, number of branches per plant and dry matter accumulation per plant crop geometry of 120 cm ´ 45 cm and 120 cm ´ 30 cm were found superior as compared to othertreatments and were at par with each other. The yield per hectare was increased at wider crop geometry 120 cm 45 cm as the higher per plant yield was compensated by lesser plant population. The crop geometry 120 cm ´ 45 cm produced significantly higher seed yield (1187, 1275 and 1231 kg ha-1 during 2021, 2022 and pooled mean respectively) over crop geometry of 90 cm ´ 30 cm and crop geometry 90 cm ´ 45 cm, but it was found at par with crop geometry 120 cm ´ 30 cm. Among the nipping practices, growth characters viz., plant height, number of functional leaves, leaf area, number of branches and dry matter accumulation per plant as well as phenological characters were enhanced with the foliar application of chlormequat chloride @500 ppm during both the years of study. Foliar application of chlormequat chloride @ 500 ppm also recorded significantly highest seed yield (1152, 1237and 1195 kg ha-1 during 2021, 2022 and in pooled data, respectively), while it was at par with foliar application of mepiquat chloride @ 500 ppm.
作物几何形状和刈割方法对鸽子豆产量和形态特征的影响
背景:提高鸽豆产量的一种可能的农艺方法是采用合适的作物几何形状和修剪方法,以获得合适的作物结构,以最佳地利用资源。本试验旨在研究不同作物形态和刈割方式对鸽豆生产潜力的影响。方法:于2021年和2022年秋收季节在哥印拜陀TNAU豆类部实验农场进行田间试验。试验采用分区设计,每4个主、副区处理。主样地处理包括四种作物几何形状,次样地处理包括不修剪、机械修剪和化学修剪。结果:不同作物形态对鸽豆的生长发育有显著影响。与其他更宽的作物几何形状相比,90 cm × 30 cm和90 cm × 45 cm的作物几何形状记录了鸽子豆的最大株高。而在所有其他生长属性,即每株功能叶数、叶面积、每株分枝数和每株干物质积累方面,与其他处理相比,120 cm´45 cm和120 cm´30 cm的作物几何形状优于其他处理,并且彼此相当。每公顷产量在作物几何宽度为120 cm ~ 45 cm时增加,因为较高的单株产量被较少的植株数量所补偿。在2021年、2022年和汇总平均值期间,120 cm´45 cm的种子产量显著高于90 cm´30 cm和90 cm´45 cm的作物产量(分别为1187、1275和1231 kg hm -1),但与120 cm´30 cm的作物产量相当。在两种刈割方式中,叶面施用500ppm氯吡菊酯均能提高植株的生长性状,包括株高、功能叶数、叶面积、分枝数、单株干物质积累量以及物候性状。叶面施用500 ppm氯吡草胺也记录了最高的种子产量(分别在2021年、2022年和汇总数据中分别为1152、1237和1195 kg ha-1),而叶面施用500 ppm氯吡草胺的产量相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信