Accuracy of Icare Rebound Tonometer and Its Comparison with Goldman Applanation Tonometer

Anila Farid, Memoona Arshad, Nimra Gul, Shabana chaudhary, Muhammad Zubair Nazar
{"title":"Accuracy of Icare Rebound Tonometer and Its Comparison with Goldman Applanation Tonometer","authors":"Anila Farid, Memoona Arshad, Nimra Gul, Shabana chaudhary, Muhammad Zubair Nazar","doi":"10.36351/pjo.v40i1.1709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose:  To determine accuracy of iCare rebound tonometer (IRT) in terms of agreement with Goldman Applanation Tonometer (GAT) and effect of Central corneal thickness (CCT) on its accuracy.\nStudy Design:  Comparative cross sectional study.\nPlace and Duration of Study:  Ophthalmology Department of Ittefaq Hospital Lahore from September 2022 to May 2023.\nMethods:  Participants of the study were recruited through non-probability convenient sampling. With Icare PRO® rebound tonometer (IRT), two consecutive sets of measurements with 6 measurements for each set were made, and the averaged values were used for the statistical analyses. After 5 minutes GAT measurement was taken for intraocular pressure (IOP). CCT was measured by ultrasound pachymetry from mean of 2 measurements noted. Data was analyzed by Bland-Altman plots for determining agreement of GAT-IOP and IRT-IOP. Pearson correlation coefficient determined the correlation of GAT-IOP and IRT-IOP with CCT.\nResults:  Out of 200 participants there were 76 (38%) males and 124 (62%) females. Mean age of participants was 27.84 ± 6.1 years. Mean IOP with IRT was 16.24 ± 2.02 (range 12.1 – 20.3 mmHg). Mean IOP with GAT was 14.40 ± 1.98 (range 11.00 – 19 mmHg). Mean IOP with adjusted CCT using GAT was 14.40 ± 1.64 (range 11 – 18 mmHg). Mean CCT was 544.81 ± 42.04 (range 615 – 471 um). Mean IOP-GAT & IOP-IRT with adjusted CCT showed normal distribution. Mean difference of IOP-GAT and IOP-IRT with t test was 1.83 ± 1.12 (p = .079).\nConclusion:  There is a strong agreement between IOP-GAT and IOP-IRT. CCT had a strong impact on IOP measurements with both tonometers. However, CCT affected IOP reading of GAT more than IRT.","PeriodicalId":169886,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"22 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36351/pjo.v40i1.1709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose:  To determine accuracy of iCare rebound tonometer (IRT) in terms of agreement with Goldman Applanation Tonometer (GAT) and effect of Central corneal thickness (CCT) on its accuracy. Study Design:  Comparative cross sectional study. Place and Duration of Study:  Ophthalmology Department of Ittefaq Hospital Lahore from September 2022 to May 2023. Methods:  Participants of the study were recruited through non-probability convenient sampling. With Icare PRO® rebound tonometer (IRT), two consecutive sets of measurements with 6 measurements for each set were made, and the averaged values were used for the statistical analyses. After 5 minutes GAT measurement was taken for intraocular pressure (IOP). CCT was measured by ultrasound pachymetry from mean of 2 measurements noted. Data was analyzed by Bland-Altman plots for determining agreement of GAT-IOP and IRT-IOP. Pearson correlation coefficient determined the correlation of GAT-IOP and IRT-IOP with CCT. Results:  Out of 200 participants there were 76 (38%) males and 124 (62%) females. Mean age of participants was 27.84 ± 6.1 years. Mean IOP with IRT was 16.24 ± 2.02 (range 12.1 – 20.3 mmHg). Mean IOP with GAT was 14.40 ± 1.98 (range 11.00 – 19 mmHg). Mean IOP with adjusted CCT using GAT was 14.40 ± 1.64 (range 11 – 18 mmHg). Mean CCT was 544.81 ± 42.04 (range 615 – 471 um). Mean IOP-GAT & IOP-IRT with adjusted CCT showed normal distribution. Mean difference of IOP-GAT and IOP-IRT with t test was 1.83 ± 1.12 (p = .079). Conclusion:  There is a strong agreement between IOP-GAT and IOP-IRT. CCT had a strong impact on IOP measurements with both tonometers. However, CCT affected IOP reading of GAT more than IRT.
Icare 回弹式眼压计的准确性及其与高盛眼压计的比较
目的:探讨iCare反弹眼压仪(IRT)与高盛眼压仪(GAT)的一致性,以及角膜中央厚度(CCT)对其准确性的影响。研究设计:比较横断面研究。学习地点和时间:2022年9月至2023年5月,拉合尔Ittefaq医院眼科。方法:采用非概率方便抽样方法招募研究对象。使用Icare PRO®回弹眼压仪(IRT),连续进行两组测量,每组测量6次,并使用平均值进行统计分析。5分钟后测量眼内压(IOP)。CCT采用超声测厚法测量,记录2次测量的平均值。采用Bland-Altman图分析GAT-IOP和IRT-IOP的一致性。Pearson相关系数确定GAT-IOP和IRT-IOP与CCT的相关性。结果:在200名参与者中,男性76人(38%),女性124人(62%)。参与者平均年龄27.84±6.1岁。IRT的平均眼压为16.24±2.02(范围12.1 - 20.3 mmHg)。GAT患者的平均眼压为14.40±1.98(范围11.00 - 19 mmHg)。使用GAT校正CCT的平均眼压为14.40±1.64(范围11 - 18 mmHg)。平均CCT为544.81±42.04 (615 ~ 471 μ m)。经调整后的平均iops - gat和iops - irt呈正态分布。经t检验,iops - gat与iops - irt的平均差值为1.83±1.12 (p = 0.079)。结论:IOP-GAT与IOP-IRT具有较强的一致性。CCT对两种眼压计的IOP测量有很大的影响。然而,CCT对GAT眼内压读数的影响大于IRT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信