Neoliberalism,Compulsory Education and Compulsion to Pay: Magnitude, Patternsand Determinants of Household Expenditurein Indian Punjab

Angrej Singh Gill, Kamlesh Narwana, P. Choudhury
{"title":"Neoliberalism,Compulsory Education and Compulsion to Pay: Magnitude, Patternsand Determinants of Household Expenditurein Indian Punjab","authors":"Angrej Singh Gill, Kamlesh Narwana, P. Choudhury","doi":"10.1177/09722661231208278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a recent primary survey, this study aims to examine the magnitude, patterns and determinants of household expenditure on compulsory schooling in Punjab. Our findings suggest that the increasing presence of private schools in the education marketplace, particularly in the contemporary era of neoliberalism, has commodified the education in the state, and these education providers offer compulsory schooling in diverse forms, with varying costs depending on the demand of their student clientele. Parents who enroll their children in elite private schools pay approximately seven times more than those choosing low-fee private schools. Private schools exert undue financial burden on their parent clientele (particularly those from low- and middle-income groups). This situation highlights the concept of ‘compulsion to pay’, especially in the absence of an acceptable quality of service provided by state-owned schools. Our regression analysis results on determinants of household expenditure reveal that households from socially and economically marginalised sections (for example, scheduled castes and the poor) spend significantly less than their more affluent counterparts. We recommend that the state take a more stringent approach to regulating these non-state education providers, particularly in terms of exorbitant fees, which would prevent further widening of the existing socio-economic inequality in the state.","PeriodicalId":202404,"journal":{"name":"Review of Development and Change","volume":"4 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Development and Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09722661231208278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on a recent primary survey, this study aims to examine the magnitude, patterns and determinants of household expenditure on compulsory schooling in Punjab. Our findings suggest that the increasing presence of private schools in the education marketplace, particularly in the contemporary era of neoliberalism, has commodified the education in the state, and these education providers offer compulsory schooling in diverse forms, with varying costs depending on the demand of their student clientele. Parents who enroll their children in elite private schools pay approximately seven times more than those choosing low-fee private schools. Private schools exert undue financial burden on their parent clientele (particularly those from low- and middle-income groups). This situation highlights the concept of ‘compulsion to pay’, especially in the absence of an acceptable quality of service provided by state-owned schools. Our regression analysis results on determinants of household expenditure reveal that households from socially and economically marginalised sections (for example, scheduled castes and the poor) spend significantly less than their more affluent counterparts. We recommend that the state take a more stringent approach to regulating these non-state education providers, particularly in terms of exorbitant fees, which would prevent further widening of the existing socio-economic inequality in the state.
新自由主义、义务教育和强制支付:印度旁遮普邦家庭支出的规模、模式和决定因素
基于最近的一项初步调查,本研究旨在研究旁遮普义务教育家庭支出的规模、模式和决定因素。我们的研究结果表明,私立学校在教育市场上的出现越来越多,特别是在新自由主义的当代,已经使国家的教育商品化,这些教育提供者以各种形式提供义务教育,根据学生客户的需求,其成本也有所不同。让孩子上精英私立学校的家长支付的费用大约是选择低收费私立学校的家长的7倍。私立学校给家长(尤其是中低收入群体)造成了不应有的经济负担。这种情况突出了“强迫支付”的概念,特别是在公立学校提供的服务质量无法令人接受的情况下。我们对家庭支出决定因素的回归分析结果显示,来自社会和经济边缘化阶层的家庭(例如,排期种姓和穷人)的支出明显低于更富裕的家庭。我们建议国家采取更严格的方法来规范这些非国家教育提供者,特别是在过高的费用方面,这将防止国家现有的社会经济不平等进一步扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信