Birds are not the only ones impacted by guidance to cease bird feeding

IF 4.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
A. Dayer, P. C. Pototsky, Richard J. Hall, Dana M. Hawley, Tina B. Phillips, David N. Bonter, Alia M. Dietsch, Emma Greig, Wesley M. Hochachka
{"title":"Birds are not the only ones impacted by guidance to cease bird feeding","authors":"A. Dayer, P. C. Pototsky, Richard J. Hall, Dana M. Hawley, Tina B. Phillips, David N. Bonter, Alia M. Dietsch, Emma Greig, Wesley M. Hochachka","doi":"10.1002/pan3.10566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nHumans have a particularly strong connection with birds, driving the enormous popularity of residential bird feeding in much of the world.\n\nWe conducted a web search to document US state wildlife management agency responses to two recent avian disease outbreaks, finding that 23 agencies made recommendations to cease feeding wild birds in 2021–2022.\n\nThe psychological benefits of bird feeding for humans are well‐documented but often overlooked in management decisions in response to avian disease outbreaks.\n\nLikewise, ecological evidence does not necessarily support ceasing bird feeding to reduce the spread of every avian disease.\n\nEcological and social science need to be applied in tandem to ensure that well‐intended guidance to cease feeding of birds does not have unintended consequences.\n\n","PeriodicalId":52850,"journal":{"name":"People and Nature","volume":"25 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"People and Nature","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10566","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans have a particularly strong connection with birds, driving the enormous popularity of residential bird feeding in much of the world. We conducted a web search to document US state wildlife management agency responses to two recent avian disease outbreaks, finding that 23 agencies made recommendations to cease feeding wild birds in 2021–2022. The psychological benefits of bird feeding for humans are well‐documented but often overlooked in management decisions in response to avian disease outbreaks. Likewise, ecological evidence does not necessarily support ceasing bird feeding to reduce the spread of every avian disease. Ecological and social science need to be applied in tandem to ensure that well‐intended guidance to cease feeding of birds does not have unintended consequences.
受停止喂鸟指导意见影响的不仅仅是鸟类
人类与鸟类的关系尤其密切,这使得在世界上许多地方,居家喂养鸟类的做法非常受欢迎。我们进行了一次网络搜索,记录了美国州野生动物管理机构对最近两次禽类疾病爆发的反应,发现23个机构提出了在2021-2022年停止喂养野生鸟类的建议。鸟类喂养给人类带来的心理上的好处是有据可查的,但在应对禽类疾病暴发的管理决策中往往被忽视。同样,生态证据也不一定支持停止喂鸟以减少每种禽类疾病的传播。生态和社会科学需要同时应用,以确保停止喂养鸟类的善意指导不会产生意想不到的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
People and Nature
People and Nature Multiple-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
103
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信