Selling Austerity to the Public: Analysing the Rhetoric of the UK Government on its Welfare Cuts

Alice Tihelková
{"title":"Selling Austerity to the Public: Analysing the Rhetoric of the UK Government on its Welfare Cuts","authors":"Alice Tihelková","doi":"10.46585/absa.2023.16.2501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past twelve years, the UK has seen a marked increase in poverty and economic inequality. While numerous factors have contributed to this situation, an undisputedly important role has been played by the continuous program of welfare spending cuts designed and executed by a series of Conservative governments. To alleviate the potential for the unpopularity of austerity measures, the Conservatives have attempted to put a positive spin on their policies by making a series of core claims emphasizing the beneficial effects of the welfare reform. Using the method of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), this paper examines these claims and offers a critique of each of them. In doing so, the research seeks to expose the use of traditional stereotypes (especially that of the “deserving” and “undeserving” poor) in the government’s rhetoric. The paper draws on a corpus of political speeches and media appearances of Conservative politicians, as well as on sociological reports and newspaper coverage. The analysis is principally focused on the two governments led by David Cameron, although some attention is also devoted to subsequent Conservative administrations.","PeriodicalId":158621,"journal":{"name":"American & British Studies Annual","volume":"130 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American & British Studies Annual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46585/absa.2023.16.2501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past twelve years, the UK has seen a marked increase in poverty and economic inequality. While numerous factors have contributed to this situation, an undisputedly important role has been played by the continuous program of welfare spending cuts designed and executed by a series of Conservative governments. To alleviate the potential for the unpopularity of austerity measures, the Conservatives have attempted to put a positive spin on their policies by making a series of core claims emphasizing the beneficial effects of the welfare reform. Using the method of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), this paper examines these claims and offers a critique of each of them. In doing so, the research seeks to expose the use of traditional stereotypes (especially that of the “deserving” and “undeserving” poor) in the government’s rhetoric. The paper draws on a corpus of political speeches and media appearances of Conservative politicians, as well as on sociological reports and newspaper coverage. The analysis is principally focused on the two governments led by David Cameron, although some attention is also devoted to subsequent Conservative administrations.
向公众推销紧缩政策:分析英国政府削减福利的言论
在过去的12年里,英国的贫困和经济不平等现象明显加剧。虽然造成这种情况的因素有很多,但一系列保守党政府设计和执行的持续削减福利支出计划无疑发挥了重要作用。为了减轻紧缩措施不受欢迎的可能性,保守党试图通过提出一系列强调福利改革有益影响的核心主张来为其政策注入积极的色彩。本文运用批评话语分析的方法对这些说法进行了检验,并对每一种说法进行了批判。在这样做的过程中,这项研究试图揭露政府言论中对传统刻板印象的使用(尤其是对“应得”和“不应得”穷人的刻板印象)。该论文借鉴了保守党政治家的政治演讲和媒体露面的语料库,以及社会学报告和报纸报道。分析主要集中在戴维•卡梅伦(David Cameron)领导的两届政府上,不过也对后来的保守党政府给予了一些关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信