Transparency and budget savings in public procurement: evidence from Thailand’s Infrastructure Transparency Initiative (CoST)

Q1 Social Sciences
Tippatrai Saelawong, Torplus Yomnak, Thanee Chaiwat, Siwat Poopunpanich, Charoen Sutuktis
{"title":"Transparency and budget savings in public procurement: evidence from Thailand’s Infrastructure Transparency Initiative (CoST)","authors":"Tippatrai Saelawong, Torplus Yomnak, Thanee Chaiwat, Siwat Poopunpanich, Charoen Sutuktis","doi":"10.1108/jfc-10-2023-0282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study evaluates the effect of transparency measures on public procurement efficiency, focusing on Thailand’s Infrastructure Transparency Initiative (CoST). This study aims to understand its impact on the country’s public infrastructure procurement practices.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper analyses Thailand’s government construction procurement data, focusing on budgetary savings and CoST process participation. Budgetary savings are this study dependent variable, while the main intervention variable is the adoption of the CoST data disclosure standard. This study uses multiple linear regression, fixed-effects model and propensity score matching with the logit model for a comprehensive analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study shows that using the CoST data disclosure leads to notable budget savings in Thai public construction procurement. With CoST’s introduction, the savings rose by Baht 9.6m, and even with added controls, the savings remained significant at around Baht 3.3m. The savings consistently stay near 5% across different models. The propensity score matching method confirms these results, consistent with factors such as open bidding and agency categorisation.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study might not capture all benefits, especially non-financial ones. Thailand’s unique context and potential biases in data sources also need consideration.\n\n\nPractical implications\nCoST evidence backs Thailand’s procurement transparency. This study recommends broadening CoST, streamlining online platforms and promoting digital public engagement. Training stakeholders and partnering with state-owned enterprises and local agencies is vital to align with CoST and mitigate risks.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study shows a clear link between transparency from information disclosure and budget efficiency in public procurement, using data from Thailand. It highlights the potential of transparency measures in developing countries.\n","PeriodicalId":38940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Crime","volume":"65 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Crime","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-10-2023-0282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study evaluates the effect of transparency measures on public procurement efficiency, focusing on Thailand’s Infrastructure Transparency Initiative (CoST). This study aims to understand its impact on the country’s public infrastructure procurement practices. Design/methodology/approach This paper analyses Thailand’s government construction procurement data, focusing on budgetary savings and CoST process participation. Budgetary savings are this study dependent variable, while the main intervention variable is the adoption of the CoST data disclosure standard. This study uses multiple linear regression, fixed-effects model and propensity score matching with the logit model for a comprehensive analysis. Findings This study shows that using the CoST data disclosure leads to notable budget savings in Thai public construction procurement. With CoST’s introduction, the savings rose by Baht 9.6m, and even with added controls, the savings remained significant at around Baht 3.3m. The savings consistently stay near 5% across different models. The propensity score matching method confirms these results, consistent with factors such as open bidding and agency categorisation. Research limitations/implications This study might not capture all benefits, especially non-financial ones. Thailand’s unique context and potential biases in data sources also need consideration. Practical implications CoST evidence backs Thailand’s procurement transparency. This study recommends broadening CoST, streamlining online platforms and promoting digital public engagement. Training stakeholders and partnering with state-owned enterprises and local agencies is vital to align with CoST and mitigate risks. Originality/value This study shows a clear link between transparency from information disclosure and budget efficiency in public procurement, using data from Thailand. It highlights the potential of transparency measures in developing countries.
公共采购的透明度和预算节约:泰国基础设施透明度倡议(CoST)的证据
本研究评估透明度措施对公共采购效率的影响,重点关注泰国的基础设施透明度倡议(成本)。本研究旨在了解其对该国公共基础设施采购实践的影响。设计/方法/途径本文分析了泰国政府的建筑采购数据,重点关注预算节约和成本过程参与。预算节约是本研究的因变量,而主要干预变量是采用成本数据披露标准。本研究采用多元线性回归、固定效应模型和倾向得分与logit模型匹配进行综合分析。本研究表明,在泰国公共建筑采购中,使用成本数据披露可以显著节省预算。随着成本的引入,节省了960万泰铢,即使加上额外的控制,节省的数额仍然很大,约为330万泰铢。在不同的车型中,节省的成本始终保持在5%左右。倾向得分匹配方法证实了这些结果,与公开招标和机构分类等因素一致。研究的局限性/意义这项研究可能没有捕捉到所有的好处,尤其是非经济方面的好处。泰国的独特背景和数据来源的潜在偏见也需要考虑。实际意义成本证据支持泰国的采购透明度。该研究建议扩大成本,简化在线平台,促进数字公众参与。培训利益相关者并与国有企业和地方机构合作,对于协调成本和降低风险至关重要。原创性/价值本研究利用泰国的数据表明,信息披露的透明度与公共采购的预算效率之间存在明显的联系。它强调了透明度措施在发展中国家的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Crime
Journal of Financial Crime Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Crime, the leading journal in this field, publishes authoritative, practical and detailed insight in the most serious and topical issues relating to the control and prevention of financial crime and related abuse. The journal''s articles are authored by some of the leading international scholars and practitioners in the fields of law, criminology, economics, criminal justice and compliance. Consequently, articles are perceptive, evidence based and have policy impact. The journal covers a wide range of current topics including, but not limited to: • Tracing through the civil law of the proceeds of fraud • Cyber-crime: prevention and detection • Intelligence led investigations • Whistleblowing and the payment of rewards for information • Identity fraud • Insider dealing prosecutions • Specialised anti-corruption investigations • Underground banking systems • Asset tracing and forfeiture • Securities regulation and enforcement • Tax regimes and tax avoidance • Deferred prosecution agreements • Personal liability of compliance managers and professional advisers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信