{"title":"Care of Children Act 2004: Continuation of Cultural Assimilation","authors":"Alison Cleland","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v54i3.8786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that the cultural assimilation of Māori family forms, originating in colonial private family laws, continues under the Care of Children Act 2004 (COCA). It finds that the opportunity to draft a law that was respectful of tikanga Māori and te Tiriti o Waitangi was lost when legislators ignored all the critiques of the operating principles and processes of the Pākehā legal system, provided by Māori during the 1980s and 1990s. The article argues that cultural assimilation continues through court decisions, since COCA principles require priority to be given to parents, with a corresponding marginalisation of whānau, hapū and iwi. The article concludes that incremental reform would be unlikely to achieve legislation that is fit for a bicultural Aotearoa New Zealand. It advocates for a transformational Māori-led family law reform process, guided by te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and by tikanga Māori.","PeriodicalId":426444,"journal":{"name":"Victoria University of Wellington law review","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victoria University of Wellington law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v54i3.8786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article argues that the cultural assimilation of Māori family forms, originating in colonial private family laws, continues under the Care of Children Act 2004 (COCA). It finds that the opportunity to draft a law that was respectful of tikanga Māori and te Tiriti o Waitangi was lost when legislators ignored all the critiques of the operating principles and processes of the Pākehā legal system, provided by Māori during the 1980s and 1990s. The article argues that cultural assimilation continues through court decisions, since COCA principles require priority to be given to parents, with a corresponding marginalisation of whānau, hapū and iwi. The article concludes that incremental reform would be unlikely to achieve legislation that is fit for a bicultural Aotearoa New Zealand. It advocates for a transformational Māori-led family law reform process, guided by te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and by tikanga Māori.
本文认为,Māori家庭形式的文化同化源于殖民时期的私人家庭法,并在2004年《照顾儿童法》(COCA)下继续下去。委员会认为,由于立法者无视Māori在1980年代和1990年代期间对Pākehā法律制度的运作原则和程序提出的所有批评,因此丧失了起草一项尊重tikanga Māori和Tiriti to Waitangi的法律的机会。这篇文章认为,文化同化通过法院判决继续进行,因为古柯原则要求优先考虑父母,相应地边缘化whānau、hapui和iwi。文章的结论是,渐进式改革不太可能实现适合新西兰二元文化的立法。它倡导在《怀唐伊提里提条约》/《怀唐伊条约》和《提康加条约》Māori指导下进行变革性Māori-led家庭法改革进程。