Countering Cyberattacks on the Energy Sector in the Russian Federation and the USA

V. Shestak, A. Tsyplakova
{"title":"Countering Cyberattacks on the Energy Sector in the Russian Federation and the USA","authors":"V. Shestak, A. Tsyplakova","doi":"10.21684/2412-2343-2023-10-4-35-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The USA leads the way in the Global Cybersecurity Index, in particular 1st place in 2015, 2020 and 2nd in 2017, 2018. Researchers are interested in examining their prevention of cyberattacks as one of the main cybersecurity threats, since Russia takes only 5th place since 2020. Provided the authors underline neglecting the principle of organized response to crime, the paper examines the pros and cons of countering cyberattacks in the U.S. energy sector and compares it with the Russian Federation. The researchers have found the American strategy is based on standardization and various platforms on the grounds of so-called security in depth, while Russian approach is wider, but demands for more details and miscellaneous mechanisms to share experience. Comparing the cybersecurity plans and strategies for U.S. energy facilities, the authors note that the U.S. specialists neglect physical safety in comparison to Russia. The diversity of bodies with vague powers is a con of the American system that the Russian Federation is trying to avoid, but the interaction between government and private representatives is stronger in the United States of America.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2023-10-4-35-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The USA leads the way in the Global Cybersecurity Index, in particular 1st place in 2015, 2020 and 2nd in 2017, 2018. Researchers are interested in examining their prevention of cyberattacks as one of the main cybersecurity threats, since Russia takes only 5th place since 2020. Provided the authors underline neglecting the principle of organized response to crime, the paper examines the pros and cons of countering cyberattacks in the U.S. energy sector and compares it with the Russian Federation. The researchers have found the American strategy is based on standardization and various platforms on the grounds of so-called security in depth, while Russian approach is wider, but demands for more details and miscellaneous mechanisms to share experience. Comparing the cybersecurity plans and strategies for U.S. energy facilities, the authors note that the U.S. specialists neglect physical safety in comparison to Russia. The diversity of bodies with vague powers is a con of the American system that the Russian Federation is trying to avoid, but the interaction between government and private representatives is stronger in the United States of America.
分享
查看原文
应对俄罗斯联邦和美国能源部门遭受的网络攻击
美国在全球网络安全指数中处于领先地位,特别是在2015年、2020年和2017年、2018年分别排名第一和第二。由于俄罗斯自2020年以来仅排在第五位,研究人员对将其预防网络攻击作为主要网络安全威胁之一感兴趣。鉴于作者强调忽视了有组织地应对犯罪的原则,本文考察了美国能源部门打击网络攻击的利弊,并将其与俄罗斯联邦进行了比较。研究人员发现,美国的战略基于标准化和各种平台,基于所谓的深度安全,而俄罗斯的方法更广泛,但需要更多细节和各种机制来分享经验。比较美国能源设施的网络安全计划和战略,作者指出,与俄罗斯相比,美国专家忽视了物理安全。权力模糊的机构的多样性是俄罗斯联邦试图避免的美国体制的一个假象,但在美利坚合众国,政府和私人代表之间的互动更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信