Charting the Course: Total Factor Productivity Trends in Croatia Post-pre-bankruptcy Act

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Z. Šergo, J. Gržinić, Mirela Sučić Čevra
{"title":"Charting the Course: Total Factor Productivity Trends in Croatia Post-pre-bankruptcy Act","authors":"Z. Šergo, J. Gržinić, Mirela Sučić Čevra","doi":"10.18690/lexonomica.15.2.189-212.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The synthetic control method (SCM) is a valuable tool for unbiased pre-bankruptcy reform analysis in economic policy evaluations. This study utilizes SCM to assess the impact of the Financial Operations and Pre-Bankruptcy Settlement Act (AFOPBS) on Croatia's total factor productivity (TFP). Control units and weights were meticulously chosen to construct a synthetic control for Croatia, creating a counterfactual scenario for the reform's absence. The policy's impact was quantified by comparing TFP growth post-policy between Croatia and its synthetic control. Placebo tests confirmed the results' significance, and further validation was achieved through panel difference-in-differences analysis (PDID). Our findings show that the pre-bankruptcy reform in late 2012 effectively reduced the gap between Croatia and its synthetic control throughout the post-treatment years. However, it had two short-term adverse impacts and a subsequent recovery-like phase. These effects were statistically significant and confirmed by cross-validation. In conclusion, Croatia's pre-bankruptcy reform significantly influenced TFP volatility, highlighting SCM's effectiveness in evaluating economic policies, especially those crucial for economic growth.","PeriodicalId":40392,"journal":{"name":"Lexonomica","volume":"58 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lexonomica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/lexonomica.15.2.189-212.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The synthetic control method (SCM) is a valuable tool for unbiased pre-bankruptcy reform analysis in economic policy evaluations. This study utilizes SCM to assess the impact of the Financial Operations and Pre-Bankruptcy Settlement Act (AFOPBS) on Croatia's total factor productivity (TFP). Control units and weights were meticulously chosen to construct a synthetic control for Croatia, creating a counterfactual scenario for the reform's absence. The policy's impact was quantified by comparing TFP growth post-policy between Croatia and its synthetic control. Placebo tests confirmed the results' significance, and further validation was achieved through panel difference-in-differences analysis (PDID). Our findings show that the pre-bankruptcy reform in late 2012 effectively reduced the gap between Croatia and its synthetic control throughout the post-treatment years. However, it had two short-term adverse impacts and a subsequent recovery-like phase. These effects were statistically significant and confirmed by cross-validation. In conclusion, Croatia's pre-bankruptcy reform significantly influenced TFP volatility, highlighting SCM's effectiveness in evaluating economic policies, especially those crucial for economic growth.
绘制航线图:克罗地亚《破产法》颁布前的全要素生产率趋势
综合控制方法(SCM)是经济政策评价中进行无偏破产前改革分析的重要工具。本研究利用供应链管理来评估金融业务和破产前结算法(AFOPBS)对克罗地亚全要素生产率(TFP)的影响。控制单元和权重被精心选择,以构建克罗地亚的综合控制,为改革的缺席创造了一个反事实的场景。通过比较克罗地亚政策实施后的TFP增长及其综合控制,量化了该政策的影响。安慰剂试验证实了结果的显著性,并通过面板差异分析(PDID)进一步验证。我们的研究结果表明,2012年底的破产前改革有效地缩小了克罗地亚与其综合控制之间的差距。然而,它有两个短期的不利影响和随后的类似恢复阶段。这些效应具有统计学意义,并经交叉验证得到证实。总之,克罗地亚破产前的改革显著影响了TFP波动,突出了SCM在评估经济政策,特别是那些对经济增长至关重要的政策方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lexonomica
Lexonomica LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信