Game sides technical-tactical differences between professional male padel players

Rodrigo Ampuero, Óscar Mellado-Arbelo, J. P. Fuentes-García, E. Baiget
{"title":"Game sides technical-tactical differences between professional male padel players","authors":"Rodrigo Ampuero, Óscar Mellado-Arbelo, J. P. Fuentes-García, E. Baiget","doi":"10.1177/17479541231218379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of this study was to analyze how professional male padel players technically-tactically behave and to whether determine if there are any differences between one game side and the other (left game side, LGS; right game side, RGS). The sample included 12.851 shots corresponding to 8 matches from the quarterfinals, semifinals, and finals of the Premier Padel circuit held in 2022 where 16 different professional right-handed padel male players participated. All matches were analyzed through systematic observation using an ad-hoc instrument. Variables such as, type of strokes, outcomes, hitting zones and switching displacements, were taken into account. Significant differences ( p < 0.05) were found on forehands, backhands, backhand volleys, forehand lobs, backhand lobs, counter wall forehand, counter-lateral wall forehand and backhand, and wall descent stroke backhand. Also, significant differences were found regarding the stroke outcomes: into play (RGS 46.4%; p < 0.05); winners (LGS 2.3%; p < 0.01). Finally, significant differences were noticed between switching displacements in which the LGS players switched considerably more times than the RGS (66.7%; p < 0.001). The reported results proved that there exist differences between both game sides regarding their strokes, stroke outcomes, and switching displacements.","PeriodicalId":182483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Science &amp; Coaching","volume":"39 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Science &amp; Coaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541231218379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to analyze how professional male padel players technically-tactically behave and to whether determine if there are any differences between one game side and the other (left game side, LGS; right game side, RGS). The sample included 12.851 shots corresponding to 8 matches from the quarterfinals, semifinals, and finals of the Premier Padel circuit held in 2022 where 16 different professional right-handed padel male players participated. All matches were analyzed through systematic observation using an ad-hoc instrument. Variables such as, type of strokes, outcomes, hitting zones and switching displacements, were taken into account. Significant differences ( p < 0.05) were found on forehands, backhands, backhand volleys, forehand lobs, backhand lobs, counter wall forehand, counter-lateral wall forehand and backhand, and wall descent stroke backhand. Also, significant differences were found regarding the stroke outcomes: into play (RGS 46.4%; p < 0.05); winners (LGS 2.3%; p < 0.01). Finally, significant differences were noticed between switching displacements in which the LGS players switched considerably more times than the RGS (66.7%; p < 0.001). The reported results proved that there exist differences between both game sides regarding their strokes, stroke outcomes, and switching displacements.
职业男子乒乓球运动员在比赛中的技术战术差异
本研究的主要目的是分析职业男性模式玩家在技术战术上的行为,以及是否确定游戏一方和另一方之间是否存在差异(游戏邦注:左游戏一方,LGS;右游戏面,RGS)。样本包括来自2022年16名职业右手男选手参加的Premier Padel巡回赛四分之一决赛、半决赛和决赛的8场比赛的12.851次击球。所有匹配分析通过系统观察使用特设仪器。诸如击球类型、结果、击球区域和转换位移等变量都被考虑在内。正手、反手、反手截击、正手高球、反手高球、正手反墙、反侧壁正反手、反手墙降球得分差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。此外,在卒中结局方面也发现了显著差异:发挥作用(RGS 46.4%;p < 0.05);赢家(LGS 2.3%;p < 0.01)。最后,LGS玩家切换位置的次数明显多于RGS玩家(66.7%;p < 0.001)。报道的结果证明,在比赛双方在击球、击球结果和转换位移方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信