{"title":"An Automated Method to Analyze Tropical Cyclone Surface Winds from Real-time Aircraft Reconnaissance Observations","authors":"J. Knaff, C. Slocum","doi":"10.1175/waf-d-23-0077.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis study describes an automated analysis of real-time tropical cyclone (TC) aircraft reconnaissance observations to estimate TC surface winds. The wind analysis uses an iterative, objective, data-weighted analysis approach with different smoothing constraints in the radial and azimuthal directions. Smoothing constraints penalize the data misfit when the solutions deviate from smoothed analyses and extend the aircraft information into areas not directly observed. The analysis composites observations following storm motion taken within five hours prior and three hours after analysis time and makes use of prescribed methods to move observations to a Common Flight Level (CFL; 700-hPa) for analysis and reduce reconnaissance observations to the surface. Comparing analyses to several observed and simulated wind fields shows that analyses fit the observations while extending observational information to poorly observed regions. However, resulting analyses tend toward greater symmetry as observational coverage decreases, and show sensitivity to the first guess information in unobserved radii. Analyses produce reasonable and useful estimates of operationally important characteristics of the wind field. But, due to the radial and azimuthal smoothing and the under-sampling of typical aircraft reconnaissance flights, wind maxima are underestimated, and the radii of maximum wind are slightly overestimated. Varying observational coverage using model-based synthetic aircraft observations, these analyses improve as observational coverage increases, and for a typical observational pattern (two transects through the storm) the root-mean-square error deviation is < 10 kt (< 5 m s−1).","PeriodicalId":49369,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Forecasting","volume":"39 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-23-0077.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study describes an automated analysis of real-time tropical cyclone (TC) aircraft reconnaissance observations to estimate TC surface winds. The wind analysis uses an iterative, objective, data-weighted analysis approach with different smoothing constraints in the radial and azimuthal directions. Smoothing constraints penalize the data misfit when the solutions deviate from smoothed analyses and extend the aircraft information into areas not directly observed. The analysis composites observations following storm motion taken within five hours prior and three hours after analysis time and makes use of prescribed methods to move observations to a Common Flight Level (CFL; 700-hPa) for analysis and reduce reconnaissance observations to the surface. Comparing analyses to several observed and simulated wind fields shows that analyses fit the observations while extending observational information to poorly observed regions. However, resulting analyses tend toward greater symmetry as observational coverage decreases, and show sensitivity to the first guess information in unobserved radii. Analyses produce reasonable and useful estimates of operationally important characteristics of the wind field. But, due to the radial and azimuthal smoothing and the under-sampling of typical aircraft reconnaissance flights, wind maxima are underestimated, and the radii of maximum wind are slightly overestimated. Varying observational coverage using model-based synthetic aircraft observations, these analyses improve as observational coverage increases, and for a typical observational pattern (two transects through the storm) the root-mean-square error deviation is < 10 kt (< 5 m s−1).
本研究描述了对实时热带气旋(TC)飞机侦察观测资料的自动分析,以估计TC地面风。风分析采用迭代、客观、数据加权的分析方法,在径向和方位角方向上具有不同的平滑约束。当解决方案偏离平滑分析并将飞机信息扩展到未直接观察到的区域时,平滑约束会惩罚数据不拟合。该分析综合了分析时间前5小时和分析时间后3小时内风暴运动后的观测资料,并利用规定的方法将观测资料移至共同飞行高度(CFL;700 hpa)进行分析,减少对地面的侦察观测。对几个观测和模拟风场的分析比较表明,分析结果与观测结果吻合,同时将观测信息扩展到观测不足的地区。然而,随着观测范围的减小,结果分析倾向于更大的对称性,并显示出对未观测半径内的第一次猜测信息的敏感性。分析可以对风场的重要操作特性作出合理而有用的估计。但是,由于典型飞机侦察飞行的径向和方面角平滑以及采样不足,极大风值被低估,最大风半径被略微高估。利用基于模型的合成飞机观测改变观测覆盖范围,这些分析随着观测覆盖范围的增加而改善,对于典型的观测模式(穿过风暴的两个断面),均方根误差偏差< 10 kt (< 5 m s - 1)。
期刊介绍:
Weather and Forecasting (WAF) (ISSN: 0882-8156; eISSN: 1520-0434) publishes research that is relevant to operational forecasting. This includes papers on significant weather events, forecasting techniques, forecast verification, model parameterizations, data assimilation, model ensembles, statistical postprocessing techniques, the transfer of research results to the forecasting community, and the societal use and value of forecasts. The scope of WAF includes research relevant to forecast lead times ranging from short-term “nowcasts” through seasonal time scales out to approximately two years.