Pietas schmietas: the danger of overinterpreting

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Steven Farron
{"title":"Pietas schmietas: the danger of overinterpreting","authors":"Steven Farron","doi":"10.1353/acl.2023.a914045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This article critiques scholarly explanations of pius Aeneas, heros, and pietas in the Aeneid; ἁμαρτία in Aristotle's Poetics 1453a; and ἡ ἀληθεστάτη πρόφασις in Thucydides 1.23.6 and 6.6.1. It argues that the scholarly process-reading and writing articles and books, lecturing, and helping students translate-leads us to exaggerate the care that ancient Greek and Roman authors applied to the exact meanings of the terms they used. In the case of pius Aeneas, heros, pietas, and ἁμαρτία we seek greater precision and clarity than Vergil and Aristotle intended. In the case of ἡ ἀληθεστάτη πρόφασις the same process leads us to ignore the possibility that a brilliant historian could have carelessly misused a crucial phrase.","PeriodicalId":41891,"journal":{"name":"Acta Classica","volume":"23 11","pages":"39 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Classica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/acl.2023.a914045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:This article critiques scholarly explanations of pius Aeneas, heros, and pietas in the Aeneid; ἁμαρτία in Aristotle's Poetics 1453a; and ἡ ἀληθεστάτη πρόφασις in Thucydides 1.23.6 and 6.6.1. It argues that the scholarly process-reading and writing articles and books, lecturing, and helping students translate-leads us to exaggerate the care that ancient Greek and Roman authors applied to the exact meanings of the terms they used. In the case of pius Aeneas, heros, pietas, and ἁμαρτία we seek greater precision and clarity than Vergil and Aristotle intended. In the case of ἡ ἀληθεστάτη πρόφασις the same process leads us to ignore the possibility that a brilliant historian could have carelessly misused a crucial phrase.
虔诚的信徒:过度解读的危险
摘要:本文对《埃涅阿斯记》中庇护斯·埃涅阿斯、英雄和圣徒的学术解释进行了批判;亚里士多德《诗学》中的 μαρτ末梢α和ἡἀληθεστάτηπρόφασις修昔底德1.23.6 6.6.1。它认为,学术过程——阅读和撰写文章和书籍、授课和帮助学生翻译——导致我们夸大了古希腊和罗马作者对他们使用的术语的确切含义的关注。在庇乌斯·埃涅阿斯、英雄、皮埃塔斯和ο μαρτ vcs α的例子中,我们寻求比维吉尔和亚里士多德想要的更精确和清晰。在关于ς ληθεστ τη πρόφασις的例子中,同样的过程使我们忽略了这样一种可能性,即一位杰出的历史学家可能不小心误用了一个关键短语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Classica
Acta Classica CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信