Analysis of screening for neonatal hypoglycemia in large-for-gestational-age newborns without risk factors, and proposed changes in practice at Grenoble University Hospital

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING
Marina Tamborowski, Sonia Ghelfi-Dufournet, Lucie Terrier, Pierre Gillois, Lionel Di Marco
{"title":"Analysis of screening for neonatal hypoglycemia in large-for-gestational-age newborns without risk factors, and proposed changes in practice at Grenoble University Hospital","authors":"Marina Tamborowski, Sonia Ghelfi-Dufournet, Lucie Terrier, Pierre Gillois, Lionel Di Marco","doi":"10.18332/ejm/174489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to evaluate the relevance of screening for neonatal hypoglycemia as it is currently performed, in order to improve the comfort of newborns by reducing the number of painful procedures such as venipunctures or capillary punctures. The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of neonatal hypoglycemia in large-for-gestational-age newborns. The secondary objective was to determine a threshold percentile of birth weight for optimal screening for hypoglycemia. METHODS We performed a descriptive, cross-sectional, single-center study, based on a structured review of obstetrical records from 11 January 2017 to 21 January 2020, from the maternity department of the University Hospital of Grenoble. Eligible neonates were large-for-gestational-age (birth weight >90th percentile) at term (37–42 weeks) without other risk factors for hypoglycemia. The primary outcome was the prevalence of neonates with capillary or venous glucose levels <2.2 mmol/L in the first 48 hours of life. We performed a sensitivity and specificity analysis of the birth weight percentile as a determinant of the threshold for hypoglycemia detection (ROC curve, area under the curve, Youden index, Brier score, Hosmer-Lemeshow test). RESULTS In all, 19.2% of the newborns presented at least one hypoglycemic episode during the first 48 hours of life, and 75.7% of the hypoglycemic episodes occurred at 1 hour of life. The cut-off percentile that seemed most appropriate for screening was determined to be the 97th percentile of birth weight (AUC=0.64; 95% CI: 0.52–0.75). CONCLUSIONS Our statistical model is robust and allows us to state that the currently used birth weight percentile threshold can be revised upwards. Thus, the protocol for neonatal hypoglycemia screening can be updated to improve the comfort of newborns at risk of hypoglycemia.","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/174489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to evaluate the relevance of screening for neonatal hypoglycemia as it is currently performed, in order to improve the comfort of newborns by reducing the number of painful procedures such as venipunctures or capillary punctures. The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of neonatal hypoglycemia in large-for-gestational-age newborns. The secondary objective was to determine a threshold percentile of birth weight for optimal screening for hypoglycemia. METHODS We performed a descriptive, cross-sectional, single-center study, based on a structured review of obstetrical records from 11 January 2017 to 21 January 2020, from the maternity department of the University Hospital of Grenoble. Eligible neonates were large-for-gestational-age (birth weight >90th percentile) at term (37–42 weeks) without other risk factors for hypoglycemia. The primary outcome was the prevalence of neonates with capillary or venous glucose levels <2.2 mmol/L in the first 48 hours of life. We performed a sensitivity and specificity analysis of the birth weight percentile as a determinant of the threshold for hypoglycemia detection (ROC curve, area under the curve, Youden index, Brier score, Hosmer-Lemeshow test). RESULTS In all, 19.2% of the newborns presented at least one hypoglycemic episode during the first 48 hours of life, and 75.7% of the hypoglycemic episodes occurred at 1 hour of life. The cut-off percentile that seemed most appropriate for screening was determined to be the 97th percentile of birth weight (AUC=0.64; 95% CI: 0.52–0.75). CONCLUSIONS Our statistical model is robust and allows us to state that the currently used birth weight percentile threshold can be revised upwards. Thus, the protocol for neonatal hypoglycemia screening can be updated to improve the comfort of newborns at risk of hypoglycemia.
格勒诺布尔大学医院对无风险因素的大胎龄新生儿新生儿低血糖筛查的分析及实践变革建议
本研究的目的是评估目前进行的新生儿低血糖筛查的相关性,以便通过减少静脉穿刺或毛细血管穿刺等痛苦手术的次数来改善新生儿的舒适度。主要目的是确定大胎龄新生儿低血糖的患病率。次要目的是确定出生体重的阈值百分位数,以最佳筛查低血糖。方法:基于对格勒诺布尔大学医院产科2017年1月11日至2020年1月21日产科记录的结构化回顾,我们进行了一项描述性、横断面、单中心研究。符合条件的新生儿为足月(37-42周)大胎龄(出生体重>90百分位数),无其他低血糖危险因素。主要结局是新生儿在出生后48小时内毛细血管或静脉血糖水平<2.2 mmol/L的发生率。我们对出生体重百分位数作为低血糖检测阈值的决定因素进行了敏感性和特异性分析(ROC曲线、曲线下面积、约登指数、Brier评分、Hosmer-Lemeshow检验)。结果:19.2%的新生儿在出生后48小时内至少出现一次低血糖发作,75.7%的低血糖发作发生在出生后1小时。最适合筛查的截止百分位数被确定为出生体重的第97百分位数(AUC=0.64;95% ci: 0.52-0.75)。结论:我们的统计模型是稳健的,并且允许我们声明目前使用的出生体重百分位阈值可以向上修正。因此,新生儿低血糖筛查方案可以更新,以提高低血糖风险新生儿的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信