The uses of polemic in Ancient Philosophy

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
D. Blyth
{"title":"The uses of polemic in Ancient Philosophy","authors":"D. Blyth","doi":"10.1353/acl.2022.a914034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Polemic in ancient philosophy must be understood in terms of the evolution of critical rationality from the Presocratics until the Hellenistic schools. I argue that it takes three forms, of varying importance at different times, that both helped to define philosophy as a distinct social practice and methodologically drove its internal evolution. These forms are criticism of non-philosophical ignorance, attacks on alternative cultural practices, and technical criticisms of other philosophers and schools of thought. Technical criticisms only become more prominent than polemic against ignorance and alternative sources of expertise with the evolution of oral dialectic, while subsequently in the imperial era a textual approach to philosophy subordinated criticisms of other schools to the common rhetorical norms of literary and historiographical polemic.","PeriodicalId":41891,"journal":{"name":"Acta Classica","volume":"50 31","pages":"11 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Classica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/acl.2022.a914034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Polemic in ancient philosophy must be understood in terms of the evolution of critical rationality from the Presocratics until the Hellenistic schools. I argue that it takes three forms, of varying importance at different times, that both helped to define philosophy as a distinct social practice and methodologically drove its internal evolution. These forms are criticism of non-philosophical ignorance, attacks on alternative cultural practices, and technical criticisms of other philosophers and schools of thought. Technical criticisms only become more prominent than polemic against ignorance and alternative sources of expertise with the evolution of oral dialectic, while subsequently in the imperial era a textual approach to philosophy subordinated criticisms of other schools to the common rhetorical norms of literary and historiographical polemic.
古代哲学中论战的用途
摘要:理解古代哲学中的论战,必须从批判理性从前苏格拉底到希腊化学派的演变过程出发。我认为它有三种形式,在不同的时期具有不同的重要性,它们都有助于将哲学定义为一种独特的社会实践,并在方法上推动其内部演变。这些形式是对非哲学无知的批评,对另类文化实践的攻击,以及对其他哲学家和思想流派的技术批评。随着口述辩证法的发展,技术批评只会比反对无知和替代专业知识来源的辩论更加突出,而随后在帝国时代,哲学的文本方法使对其他学派的批评服从于文学和史学辩论的共同修辞规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Classica
Acta Classica CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信