Management of stage 1 renal cell cancer in patients immunosuppressed for organ transplantation or autoimmune disease

Alireza Ghasemzadeh, Eric T. Wendt, Brendan Dolan, Juliana Craig, G. Allen, E. J. Abel, D. D. Shapiro
{"title":"Management of stage 1 renal cell cancer in patients immunosuppressed for organ transplantation or autoimmune disease","authors":"Alireza Ghasemzadeh, Eric T. Wendt, Brendan Dolan, Juliana Craig, G. Allen, E. J. Abel, D. D. Shapiro","doi":"10.3389/fruro.2023.1324696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To describe the treatment and outcomes of patients who are medically immunosuppressed due to prior organ transplantation or autoimmune disease with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma (cT1).An institutional database of patients treated for RCC was queried for patients with cT1 RCC and on chronic medical immunosuppression at the time of RCC diagnosis. The outcomes for patients undergoing (1) surgery, (2) ablation, or 3) active surveillance (AS) are described.Between 2010 and 2022, 74 medically immunosuppressed patients with RCC were identified and treated using surgery (n = 29), ablation (n = 33), or AS (n = 12). Seven (58%) AS patients underwent deferred treatment (six ablations and one nephrectomy) due to tumor growth. For surgery patients and ablation patients, the 30-day readmission rates [17% and 9%, respectively (p = 0.7)], and 90-day complication rates [24% and 21%, respectively (p = 0.9)] were similar. One (3%) surgical patient and two (6%) ablation patients recurred locally. Despite being immunosuppressed, only one (3%) surgical patient, one (3%) ablation patient, and no AS patients progressed to metastatic disease. No significant differences were noted for the local recurrence-free rates, metastasis-free rates, and overall survival for the three cohorts (p > 0.05 for all).Patients with stage one RCC with medical immunosuppression can be safely managed through surgery, thermal ablation, or active surveillance, with similar outcomes to historical series of non-immunosuppressed patients. Future prospective studies should investigate shared decision making in this patient cohort and include discussion of less aggressive options that minimize morbidity but preserve oncologic control.","PeriodicalId":73113,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in urology","volume":"78 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fruro.2023.1324696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To describe the treatment and outcomes of patients who are medically immunosuppressed due to prior organ transplantation or autoimmune disease with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma (cT1).An institutional database of patients treated for RCC was queried for patients with cT1 RCC and on chronic medical immunosuppression at the time of RCC diagnosis. The outcomes for patients undergoing (1) surgery, (2) ablation, or 3) active surveillance (AS) are described.Between 2010 and 2022, 74 medically immunosuppressed patients with RCC were identified and treated using surgery (n = 29), ablation (n = 33), or AS (n = 12). Seven (58%) AS patients underwent deferred treatment (six ablations and one nephrectomy) due to tumor growth. For surgery patients and ablation patients, the 30-day readmission rates [17% and 9%, respectively (p = 0.7)], and 90-day complication rates [24% and 21%, respectively (p = 0.9)] were similar. One (3%) surgical patient and two (6%) ablation patients recurred locally. Despite being immunosuppressed, only one (3%) surgical patient, one (3%) ablation patient, and no AS patients progressed to metastatic disease. No significant differences were noted for the local recurrence-free rates, metastasis-free rates, and overall survival for the three cohorts (p > 0.05 for all).Patients with stage one RCC with medical immunosuppression can be safely managed through surgery, thermal ablation, or active surveillance, with similar outcomes to historical series of non-immunosuppressed patients. Future prospective studies should investigate shared decision making in this patient cohort and include discussion of less aggressive options that minimize morbidity but preserve oncologic control.
对因器官移植或自身免疫性疾病而接受免疫抑制治疗的 1 期肾细胞癌患者的管理
描述因既往器官移植或自身免疫性疾病而免疫抑制的临床T1型肾细胞癌(cT1)患者的治疗和结果。在RCC诊断时,查询了cT1 RCC患者和慢性药物免疫抑制患者的RCC治疗机构数据库。本文描述了接受(1)手术、(2)消融或(3)主动监测(AS)的患者的结果。2010年至2022年期间,74名医学免疫抑制的RCC患者被确定并使用手术(n = 29)、消融(n = 33)或AS (n = 12)进行治疗。7例(58%)AS患者因肿瘤生长而推迟治疗(6例消融和1例肾切除术)。对于手术患者和消融患者,30天的再入院率[分别为17%和9% (p = 0.7)]和90天的并发症发生率[分别为24%和21% (p = 0.9)]相似。1例(3%)手术患者和2例(6%)消融患者局部复发。尽管免疫抑制,只有1例(3%)手术患者,1例(3%)消融患者,没有AS患者进展为转移性疾病。三个队列的局部无复发率、无转移率和总生存率均无显著差异(p > 0.05)。药物免疫抑制的一期RCC患者可以通过手术、热消融或主动监测来安全管理,其结果与历史上一系列非免疫抑制患者相似。未来的前瞻性研究应调查该患者队列中的共同决策,并包括讨论将发病率降至最低但保持肿瘤控制的低侵袭性选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信