What does it mean to be “prepared for work”? Perceptions of new engineers

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jessica R. Deters, Marie C. Paretti, Logan A. Perry, Robin Ott
{"title":"What does it mean to be “prepared for work”? Perceptions of new engineers","authors":"Jessica R. Deters,&nbsp;Marie C. Paretti,&nbsp;Logan A. Perry,&nbsp;Robin Ott","doi":"10.1002/jee.20572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Engineering education seeks to prepare students for engineering practice, but the concept of preparedness is often ill-defined. Moreover, findings from studies of different populations or in different contexts vary regarding how well new graduates are prepared. These variations, coupled with the lack of clarity, suggest the need to better understand what it means to be prepared for engineering work.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study contributes to research on workplace preparation by exploring how new graduates describe being prepared for engineering work.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Applying secondary analysis to data from the multi-institution Capstone To Work (C2W) project, we used thematic analysis to explore new engineers' descriptions of preparedness. We analyzed written responses to structured questions about the school-to-work transition collected weekly during participants' first 12 weeks of work; 105 graduates drawn from four universities provided 956 responses, with a mean of 9 (out of 12 possible) responses per participant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants' descriptions of preparedness included applying concrete skills, recognizing familiar situations, and having strategies for approaching challenging tasks even when they lacked relevant knowledge or skill.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest that although many discussions about workplace preparation implicitly focus narrowly on mastery of skills and knowledge, that focus may not fully capture new graduates' experiences, and may limit discussions about the ways in which school can (and cannot) prepare students for work. A more expansive understanding may better support both student learning and workplace onboarding, though more research is needed across stakeholders to establish shared understanding.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"113 1","pages":"103-123"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jee.20572","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jee.20572","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Engineering education seeks to prepare students for engineering practice, but the concept of preparedness is often ill-defined. Moreover, findings from studies of different populations or in different contexts vary regarding how well new graduates are prepared. These variations, coupled with the lack of clarity, suggest the need to better understand what it means to be prepared for engineering work.

Purpose

This study contributes to research on workplace preparation by exploring how new graduates describe being prepared for engineering work.

Method

Applying secondary analysis to data from the multi-institution Capstone To Work (C2W) project, we used thematic analysis to explore new engineers' descriptions of preparedness. We analyzed written responses to structured questions about the school-to-work transition collected weekly during participants' first 12 weeks of work; 105 graduates drawn from four universities provided 956 responses, with a mean of 9 (out of 12 possible) responses per participant.

Results

Participants' descriptions of preparedness included applying concrete skills, recognizing familiar situations, and having strategies for approaching challenging tasks even when they lacked relevant knowledge or skill.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that although many discussions about workplace preparation implicitly focus narrowly on mastery of skills and knowledge, that focus may not fully capture new graduates' experiences, and may limit discussions about the ways in which school can (and cannot) prepare students for work. A more expansive understanding may better support both student learning and workplace onboarding, though more research is needed across stakeholders to establish shared understanding.

为工作做好准备 "意味着什么?对新工程师的看法
工程教育旨在让学生为工程实践做好准备,但准备的概念往往定义不清。此外,针对不同人群或不同背景的研究发现,新毕业生的准备程度也不尽相同。这些变化,加上缺乏明确性,表明需要更好地理解为工程工作做好准备意味着什么。本研究通过探索新毕业生如何描述为工程工作做好准备,有助于研究工作场所准备。通过对多机构顶点工作(C2W)项目数据的二次分析,我们使用主题分析来探索新工程师对准备的描述。我们分析了参与者在工作的前12周每周收集的关于从学校到工作过渡的结构化问题的书面回答;来自四所大学的105名毕业生提供了956份回复,平均每位参与者有9份回复(可能有12份)。参与者对准备工作的描述包括运用具体的技能,识别熟悉的情况,以及即使在缺乏相关知识或技能的情况下也有应对挑战性任务的策略。我们的研究结果表明,尽管许多关于职场准备的讨论含蓄地狭隘地关注技能和知识的掌握,但这种关注可能无法完全捕捉到新毕业生的经历,并且可能限制了关于学校可以(或不可以)为学生做好工作准备的方式的讨论。更广泛的理解可能会更好地支持学生学习和职场入职,尽管需要更多的研究来建立利益相关者之间的共同理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Education
Journal of Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering Education (JEE) serves to cultivate, disseminate, and archive scholarly research in engineering education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信