Unified Magnifying Endoscopic Classification (UMEC) of Gastrointestinal Lesions: A North American Validation Study

M. R. Fujiyoshi, Y. Fujiyoshi, N. Gimpaya, R. Bechara, T. Jeyalingam, N. Calo, Nauzer Forbes, Katarzyna M. Pawlak, Kareem Khalaf, R. Khan, M. Atalla, Akiko Toshimori, Y. Shimamura, M. Tanabe, Christopher Teshima, J. Mosko, Gary May, Haruhiro Inoue, S. Grover
{"title":"Unified Magnifying Endoscopic Classification (UMEC) of Gastrointestinal Lesions: A North American Validation Study","authors":"M. R. Fujiyoshi, Y. Fujiyoshi, N. Gimpaya, R. Bechara, T. Jeyalingam, N. Calo, Nauzer Forbes, Katarzyna M. Pawlak, Kareem Khalaf, R. Khan, M. Atalla, Akiko Toshimori, Y. Shimamura, M. Tanabe, Christopher Teshima, J. Mosko, Gary May, Haruhiro Inoue, S. Grover","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwad055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Magnifying endoscopy enables the diagnosis of advanced neoplasia throughout the gastrointestinal tract. The unified magnifying endoscopic classification (UMEC) framework unifies optical diagnosis criteria in the esophagus, stomach, and colon, dividing lesions into three categories: non-neoplastic, intramucosal neoplasia, and deep submucosal invasive cancer. This study aims to ascertain the performance of North American endoscopists when using the UMEC.\n \n \n \n In this retrospective cohort study, five North American endoscopists without prior training in magnifying endoscopy independently diagnosed images of gastrointestinal tract lesions using UMEC. All endoscopists were blinded to endoscopic findings and histopathological diagnosis. Using histopathology as the gold standard, the endoscopists’ diagnostic performances using UMEC were evaluated.\n \n \n \n A total of 299 lesions (77 esophagus, 92 stomach, and 130 colon) were assessed. For esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy ranged from 65.2% (95%CI: 50.9–77.9) to 87.0% (95%CI: 75.3–94.6), 77.4% (95%CI: 60.9–89.6) to 96.8% (95%CI: 86.8–99.8), and 75.3% to 87.0%, respectively. For gastric adenocarcinoma, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy ranged from 94.9% (95%CI: 85.0–99.1) to 100%, 52.9% (95%CI: 39.4–66.2) to 92.2% (95%CI: 82.7–97.5), and 73.3% to 93.3%. For colorectal adenocarcinoma, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy ranged from 76.2% (95%CI: 62.0–87.3) to 83.3% (95%CI: 70.3–92.5), 89.7% (95%CI: 82.1–94.9) to 97.7% (95%CI: 93.1–99.6), and 86.8% to 90.7%. Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated good to excellent reliability.\n \n \n \n UMEC is a simple classification that may be used to introduce endoscopists to magnifying narrow-band imaging and optical diagnosis, yielding satisfactory diagnostic accuracy.\n","PeriodicalId":17263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwad055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magnifying endoscopy enables the diagnosis of advanced neoplasia throughout the gastrointestinal tract. The unified magnifying endoscopic classification (UMEC) framework unifies optical diagnosis criteria in the esophagus, stomach, and colon, dividing lesions into three categories: non-neoplastic, intramucosal neoplasia, and deep submucosal invasive cancer. This study aims to ascertain the performance of North American endoscopists when using the UMEC. In this retrospective cohort study, five North American endoscopists without prior training in magnifying endoscopy independently diagnosed images of gastrointestinal tract lesions using UMEC. All endoscopists were blinded to endoscopic findings and histopathological diagnosis. Using histopathology as the gold standard, the endoscopists’ diagnostic performances using UMEC were evaluated. A total of 299 lesions (77 esophagus, 92 stomach, and 130 colon) were assessed. For esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy ranged from 65.2% (95%CI: 50.9–77.9) to 87.0% (95%CI: 75.3–94.6), 77.4% (95%CI: 60.9–89.6) to 96.8% (95%CI: 86.8–99.8), and 75.3% to 87.0%, respectively. For gastric adenocarcinoma, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy ranged from 94.9% (95%CI: 85.0–99.1) to 100%, 52.9% (95%CI: 39.4–66.2) to 92.2% (95%CI: 82.7–97.5), and 73.3% to 93.3%. For colorectal adenocarcinoma, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy ranged from 76.2% (95%CI: 62.0–87.3) to 83.3% (95%CI: 70.3–92.5), 89.7% (95%CI: 82.1–94.9) to 97.7% (95%CI: 93.1–99.6), and 86.8% to 90.7%. Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated good to excellent reliability. UMEC is a simple classification that may be used to introduce endoscopists to magnifying narrow-band imaging and optical diagnosis, yielding satisfactory diagnostic accuracy.
胃肠道病变的统一放大内镜分类 (UMEC):北美验证研究
放大内窥镜可以诊断整个胃肠道的晚期肿瘤。统一放大内镜分类(UMEC)框架统一了食道、胃和结肠的光学诊断标准,将病变分为非肿瘤性、粘膜内瘤变和深部粘膜下浸润性癌三大类。本研究旨在确定北美内窥镜医师在使用UMEC时的表现。在这项回顾性队列研究中,五名未经放大内镜培训的北美内窥镜医师使用UMEC独立诊断胃肠道病变图像。所有内窥镜检查人员对内窥镜检查结果和组织病理学诊断均不知情。以组织病理学为金标准,评估内镜医师使用UMEC的诊断性能。总共评估了299个病变(77个食道,92个胃,130个结肠)。对于食管鳞状细胞癌,其敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为65.2% (95%CI: 50.9 ~ 77.9) ~ 87.0% (95%CI: 75.3 ~ 94.6)、77.4% (95%CI: 60.9 ~ 89.6) ~ 96.8% (95%CI: 85.8 ~ 99.8)和75.3% ~ 87.0%。对于胃腺癌,其敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为94.9% (95%CI: 85.0 ~ 99.1) ~ 100%、52.9% (95%CI: 39.4 ~ 66.2) ~ 92.2% (95%CI: 82.7 ~ 97.5)和73.3% ~ 93.3%。对于结直肠腺癌,其敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为76.2% (95%CI: 62.0 ~ 87.3) ~ 83.3% (95%CI: 70.3 ~ 92.5)、89.7% (95%CI: 82.1 ~ 94.9) ~ 97.7% (95%CI: 93.1 ~ 99.6)和86.8% ~ 90.7%。类内相关系数表明信度良好至优异。UMEC是一个简单的分类,可用于介绍内窥镜医师放大窄带成像和光学诊断,产生令人满意的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信