{"title":"Listening to learn: investigating how teacher leaders elicit and attend to students’ mathematical thinking in clinical interviews","authors":"Nicora Placa","doi":"10.1007/s10857-023-09614-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Eliciting and attending to students’ thinking is an important component of teaching mathematics for understanding. Clinical interview protocols have shown the potential to support teachers in developing these skills. However, less is known about how to support teacher leaders’ knowledge and development of these skills. Given that teacher leaders provide opportunities to foster teachers’ knowledge of these ideas, more needs to be known about teacher leaders’ abilities and knowledge in this area, and how clinical interviews might support teacher leaders’ pedagogical knowledge. This study explored the nuances in understanding the ways in which teacher leaders elicited and attended to student thinking when conducting clinical interviews. Findings show that while the majority of teacher leaders who engaged in conducting clinical interviews asked probing questions and engaged in observational thinking, they also faced challenges in moving toward responsive listening, particularly when students struggled with providing justification for a task.</p>","PeriodicalId":47442,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education","volume":"256 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09614-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Eliciting and attending to students’ thinking is an important component of teaching mathematics for understanding. Clinical interview protocols have shown the potential to support teachers in developing these skills. However, less is known about how to support teacher leaders’ knowledge and development of these skills. Given that teacher leaders provide opportunities to foster teachers’ knowledge of these ideas, more needs to be known about teacher leaders’ abilities and knowledge in this area, and how clinical interviews might support teacher leaders’ pedagogical knowledge. This study explored the nuances in understanding the ways in which teacher leaders elicited and attended to student thinking when conducting clinical interviews. Findings show that while the majority of teacher leaders who engaged in conducting clinical interviews asked probing questions and engaged in observational thinking, they also faced challenges in moving toward responsive listening, particularly when students struggled with providing justification for a task.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education (JMTE) is devoted to research into the education of mathematics teachers and development of teaching that promotes students'' successful learning of mathematics. JMTE focuses on all stages of professional development of mathematics teachers and teacher-educators and serves as a forum for considering institutional, societal and cultural influences that impact on teachers'' learning, and ultimately that of their students. Critical analyses of particular programmes, development initiatives, technology, assessment, teaching diverse populations and policy matters, as these topics relate to the main focuses of the journal, are welcome. All papers are rigorously refereed.
Papers may be submitted to one of three sections of JMTE as follows: Research papers: these papers should reflect the main focuses of the journal identified above and should be of more than local or national interest.
Mathematics Teacher Education Around the World: these papers focus on programmes and issues of national significance that could be of wider interest or influence.
Reader Commentary: these are short contributions; for example, offering a response to a paper published in JMTE or developing a theoretical idea. Authors should state clearly the section to which they are submitting a paper. As general guidance, papers should not normally exceed the following word lengths: (1) 10,000 words; (2) 5,000 words; (3) 3,000 words. Maximum word lengths exclude references, figures, appendices, etc.
Critiques of reports or books that relate to the main focuses of JMTE appear as appropriate.