Listening to learn: investigating how teacher leaders elicit and attend to students’ mathematical thinking in clinical interviews

IF 2.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nicora Placa
{"title":"Listening to learn: investigating how teacher leaders elicit and attend to students’ mathematical thinking in clinical interviews","authors":"Nicora Placa","doi":"10.1007/s10857-023-09614-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Eliciting and attending to students’ thinking is an important component of teaching mathematics for understanding. Clinical interview protocols have shown the potential to support teachers in developing these skills. However, less is known about how to support teacher leaders’ knowledge and development of these skills. Given that teacher leaders provide opportunities to foster teachers’ knowledge of these ideas, more needs to be known about teacher leaders’ abilities and knowledge in this area, and how clinical interviews might support teacher leaders’ pedagogical knowledge. This study explored the nuances in understanding the ways in which teacher leaders elicited and attended to student thinking when conducting clinical interviews. Findings show that while the majority of teacher leaders who engaged in conducting clinical interviews asked probing questions and engaged in observational thinking, they also faced challenges in moving toward responsive listening, particularly when students struggled with providing justification for a task.</p>","PeriodicalId":47442,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education","volume":"256 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09614-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eliciting and attending to students’ thinking is an important component of teaching mathematics for understanding. Clinical interview protocols have shown the potential to support teachers in developing these skills. However, less is known about how to support teacher leaders’ knowledge and development of these skills. Given that teacher leaders provide opportunities to foster teachers’ knowledge of these ideas, more needs to be known about teacher leaders’ abilities and knowledge in this area, and how clinical interviews might support teacher leaders’ pedagogical knowledge. This study explored the nuances in understanding the ways in which teacher leaders elicited and attended to student thinking when conducting clinical interviews. Findings show that while the majority of teacher leaders who engaged in conducting clinical interviews asked probing questions and engaged in observational thinking, they also faced challenges in moving toward responsive listening, particularly when students struggled with providing justification for a task.

倾听学习:研究教师领导如何在临床访谈中激发和关注学生的数学思维
激发和关注学生的思维是数学教学的重要组成部分。临床访谈协议已显示出支持教师发展这些技能的潜力。然而,人们对如何支持教师领导了解和发展这些技能却知之甚少。鉴于教师领导为培养教师对这些理念的认识提供了机会,我们需要更多地了解教师领导在这方面的能力和知识,以及临床访谈如何支持教师领导的教学知识。本研究探讨了教师领导在进行临床访谈时如何激发和关注学生思维的细微差别。研究结果表明,虽然大多数参与临床访谈的教师领导都提出了探究性问题并进行了观察思考,但他们在进行回应性倾听时也面临着挑战,特别是当学生在为某项任务提供正当理由时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education (JMTE) is devoted to research into the education of mathematics teachers and development of teaching that promotes students'' successful learning of mathematics. JMTE focuses on all stages of professional development of mathematics teachers and teacher-educators and serves as a forum for considering institutional, societal and cultural influences that impact on teachers'' learning, and ultimately that of their students. Critical analyses of particular programmes, development initiatives, technology, assessment, teaching diverse populations and policy matters, as these topics relate to the main focuses of the journal, are welcome. All papers are rigorously refereed. Papers may be submitted to one of three sections of JMTE as follows: Research papers: these papers should reflect the main focuses of the journal identified above and should be of more than local or national interest. Mathematics Teacher Education Around the World: these papers focus on programmes and issues of national significance that could be of wider interest or influence. Reader Commentary: these are short contributions; for example, offering a response to a paper published in JMTE or developing a theoretical idea. Authors should state clearly the section to which they are submitting a paper. As general guidance, papers should not normally exceed the following word lengths: (1) 10,000 words; (2) 5,000 words; (3) 3,000 words. Maximum word lengths exclude references, figures, appendices, etc. Critiques of reports or books that relate to the main focuses of JMTE appear as appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信