Liquidity and Business Cycles—With Occasional Disruptions

IF 1.1 Q3 ECONOMICS
Willi Semmler, Gabriel R. Padró Rosario, Levent Koçkesen
{"title":"Liquidity and Business Cycles—With Occasional Disruptions","authors":"Willi Semmler, Gabriel R. Padró Rosario, Levent Koçkesen","doi":"10.3390/econometrics11040027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some financial disruptions that started in California, U.S., in March 2023, resulting in the closure of several medium-size U.S. banks, shed new light on the role of liquidity in business cycle dynamics. In the normal path of the business cycle, liquidity and output mutually interact. Small shocks generally lead to mean reversion through market forces, as a low degree of liquidity dissipation does not significantly disrupt the economic dynamics. However, larger shocks and greater liquidity dissipation arising from runs on financial institutions and contagion effects can trigger tipping points, financial disruptions, and economic downturns. The latter poses severe challenges for Central Banks, which during normal times, usually maintain a hands-off approach with soft regulation and monitoring, allowing the market to operate. However, in severe times of liquidity dissipation, they must swiftly restore liquidity flows and rebuild trust in stability to avoid further disruptions and meltdowns. In this paper, we present a nonlinear model of the liquidity–macro interaction and econometrically explore those types of dynamic features with data from the U.S. economy. Guided by a theoretical model, we use nonlinear econometric methods of a Smooth Transition Regression type to study those features, which provide and suggest further regulation and monitoring guidelines and institutional enforcement of rules.","PeriodicalId":11499,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics11040027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some financial disruptions that started in California, U.S., in March 2023, resulting in the closure of several medium-size U.S. banks, shed new light on the role of liquidity in business cycle dynamics. In the normal path of the business cycle, liquidity and output mutually interact. Small shocks generally lead to mean reversion through market forces, as a low degree of liquidity dissipation does not significantly disrupt the economic dynamics. However, larger shocks and greater liquidity dissipation arising from runs on financial institutions and contagion effects can trigger tipping points, financial disruptions, and economic downturns. The latter poses severe challenges for Central Banks, which during normal times, usually maintain a hands-off approach with soft regulation and monitoring, allowing the market to operate. However, in severe times of liquidity dissipation, they must swiftly restore liquidity flows and rebuild trust in stability to avoid further disruptions and meltdowns. In this paper, we present a nonlinear model of the liquidity–macro interaction and econometrically explore those types of dynamic features with data from the U.S. economy. Guided by a theoretical model, we use nonlinear econometric methods of a Smooth Transition Regression type to study those features, which provide and suggest further regulation and monitoring guidelines and institutional enforcement of rules.
流动性与商业周期--偶有中断
2023 年 3 月,美国加利福尼亚州发生了一些金融混乱,导致美国几家中型银行倒闭,这使人们对流动性在商业周期动态中的作用有了新的认识。在商业周期的正常路径中,流动性与产出相互影响。小规模冲击一般会通过市场力量导致均值回归,因为低程度的流动性耗散不会显著扰乱经济动态。然而,金融机构挤兑和传染效应导致的更大冲击和更严重的流动性耗散会引发临界点、金融混乱和经济衰退。后者给中央银行带来了严峻挑战,因为在正常时期,中央银行通常会采取放手不管的做法,进行软监管和监测,让市场运作。然而,在流动性严重流失时,中央银行必须迅速恢复流动性,重建对稳定的信任,以避免进一步的混乱和崩溃。在本文中,我们提出了一个流动性与宏观互动的非线性模型,并利用美国经济数据从经济学角度探讨了这些类型的动态特征。在理论模型的指导下,我们使用平滑过渡回归类型的非线性计量经济学方法来研究这些特征,从而提供并建议进一步的监管和监督准则以及规则的制度执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Econometrics
Econometrics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信