Role of antioxidative activity in the docosahexaenoic acid’s enteroprotective effect in the indomethacin-induced small intestinal injury model

Martha Ivonne Sánchez-Trigueros, Ivette Astrid Martínez-Vieyra, Elizabeth Arlen Pineda-Peña, Gilberto Castañeda-Hernández, Claudia Perez-Cruz, Doris Cerecedo, Aracely Evangelina Chávez-Piña
{"title":"Role of antioxidative activity in the docosahexaenoic acid’s enteroprotective effect in the indomethacin-induced small intestinal injury model","authors":"Martha Ivonne Sánchez-Trigueros, Ivette Astrid Martínez-Vieyra, Elizabeth Arlen Pineda-Peña, Gilberto Castañeda-Hernández, Claudia Perez-Cruz, Doris Cerecedo, Aracely Evangelina Chávez-Piña","doi":"10.1007/s00210-023-02881-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Therapeutic effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been related with gastrointestinal injury. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), an omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), can prevent gastric and small intestinal damage. Nonetheless, contribution of antioxidative action in the protective effect of DHA has not been evaluated before in the small intestine injury after indomethacin treatment. Pathogenesis of NSAID-induced small intestinal injury is multifactorial, and reactive oxidative species have been related to indomethacin’s small intestinal damage. The present work aimed to evaluate antioxidative activity in the protective action of DHA in the indomethacin-induced small intestinal damage. Female Wistar rats were gavage with DHA (3 mg/kg) or omeprazole (3 mg/kg) for 10 days. Each rat received indomethacin (3 mg/kg, orally) daily to induce small intestinal damage. The total area of intestinal ulcers and histopathological analysis were performed. In DHA-treated rats, myeloperoxidase and superoxide dismutase activity, glutathione, malondialdehyde, leukotriene, and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) levels were measured. Furthermore, the relative abundance of selective bacteria was assessed. DHA administration (3 mg/kg, p.o.) caused a significant decrease in indomethacin-induced small intestinal injury in Wistar rats after 10 days of treatment. DHA’s enteroprotection resulted from the prevention of an increase in myeloperoxidase activity, and lipoperoxidation, as well as an improvement in the antioxidant defenses, such as glutathione levels and superoxide dismutase activity in the small intestine. Furthermore, we showed that DHA’s enteroprotective effect decreased significantly LPS levels in indomethacin-induced injury in small intestine. Our data suggest that DHA’s enteroprotective might be attributed to the prevention of oxidative stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":18862,"journal":{"name":"Naunyn-schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naunyn-schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-023-02881-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapeutic effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been related with gastrointestinal injury. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), an omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), can prevent gastric and small intestinal damage. Nonetheless, contribution of antioxidative action in the protective effect of DHA has not been evaluated before in the small intestine injury after indomethacin treatment. Pathogenesis of NSAID-induced small intestinal injury is multifactorial, and reactive oxidative species have been related to indomethacin’s small intestinal damage. The present work aimed to evaluate antioxidative activity in the protective action of DHA in the indomethacin-induced small intestinal damage. Female Wistar rats were gavage with DHA (3 mg/kg) or omeprazole (3 mg/kg) for 10 days. Each rat received indomethacin (3 mg/kg, orally) daily to induce small intestinal damage. The total area of intestinal ulcers and histopathological analysis were performed. In DHA-treated rats, myeloperoxidase and superoxide dismutase activity, glutathione, malondialdehyde, leukotriene, and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) levels were measured. Furthermore, the relative abundance of selective bacteria was assessed. DHA administration (3 mg/kg, p.o.) caused a significant decrease in indomethacin-induced small intestinal injury in Wistar rats after 10 days of treatment. DHA’s enteroprotection resulted from the prevention of an increase in myeloperoxidase activity, and lipoperoxidation, as well as an improvement in the antioxidant defenses, such as glutathione levels and superoxide dismutase activity in the small intestine. Furthermore, we showed that DHA’s enteroprotective effect decreased significantly LPS levels in indomethacin-induced injury in small intestine. Our data suggest that DHA’s enteroprotective might be attributed to the prevention of oxidative stress.

Abstract Image

抗氧化活性在二十二碳六烯酸对吲哚美辛诱导的小肠损伤模型的肠道保护作用中的作用
非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的治疗效果与胃肠道损伤有关。二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)是一种欧米伽-3 多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFA),可预防胃和小肠损伤。然而,在吲哚美辛治疗后的小肠损伤中,DHA的保护作用中抗氧化作用的贡献尚未得到评估。非甾体抗炎药诱发小肠损伤的发病机制是多因素的,活性氧化物与吲哚美辛的小肠损伤有关。本研究旨在评估 DHA 对吲哚美辛诱导的小肠损伤的保护作用中的抗氧化活性。雌性 Wistar 大鼠连续 10 天灌胃 DHA(3 毫克/千克)或奥美拉唑(3 毫克/千克)。每只大鼠每天口服吲哚美辛(3 毫克/千克)以诱发小肠损伤。对肠溃疡的总面积和组织病理学进行分析。在 DHA 处理的大鼠中,测量了髓过氧化物酶和超氧化物歧化酶活性、谷胱甘肽、丙二醛、白三烯和脂多糖(LPS)水平。此外,还评估了选择性细菌的相对丰度。给 Wistar 大鼠服用 DHA(3 毫克/千克,口服)10 天后,吲哚美辛引起的小肠损伤明显减轻。DHA 的肠道保护作用来自于防止髓过氧化物酶活性和脂肪过氧化的增加,以及改善抗氧化防御功能,如谷胱甘肽水平和小肠中超氧化物歧化酶的活性。此外,我们还发现,在吲哚美辛诱导的小肠损伤中,DHA的肠道保护作用显著降低了LPS水平。我们的数据表明,DHA的肠道保护作用可能归因于对氧化应激的预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信