Comparison of Ensemble-Based Data Assimilation Methods for Sparse Oceanographic Data

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Florian Beiser, Håavard Heitlo Holm, Jo Eidsvik
{"title":"Comparison of Ensemble-Based Data Assimilation Methods for Sparse Oceanographic Data","authors":"Florian Beiser, Håavard Heitlo Holm, Jo Eidsvik","doi":"10.1002/qj.4637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Probabilistic forecasts in oceanographic applications, such as drift trajectory forecasts for search-and-rescue operations, face challenges due to high-dimensional complex models and sparse spatial observations. We discuss localisation strategies for assimilating sparse point observations and compare the implicit equal-weights particle filter and a localised version of the ensemble-transform Kalman filter. First, we verify these methods thoroughly against the analytic Kalman filter solution for a linear advection diffusion model. We then use a non-linear simplified ocean model to do state estimation and drift prediction. The methods are rigorously compared using a wide range of metrics and skill scores. Our findings indicate that both methods succeed in approximating the Kalman filter reference for linear models of moderate dimensions, even for small ensemble sizes. However, in high-dimensional settings with a non-linear model, we discover that the outcomes are significantly influenced by the dependence of the ensemble Kalman filter on relaxation and the particle filter's sensitivity to the chosen model error covariance structure. Upon proper relaxation and localisation parametrisation, the ensemble Kalman filter version outperforms the particle filter in our experiments.","PeriodicalId":49646,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4637","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Probabilistic forecasts in oceanographic applications, such as drift trajectory forecasts for search-and-rescue operations, face challenges due to high-dimensional complex models and sparse spatial observations. We discuss localisation strategies for assimilating sparse point observations and compare the implicit equal-weights particle filter and a localised version of the ensemble-transform Kalman filter. First, we verify these methods thoroughly against the analytic Kalman filter solution for a linear advection diffusion model. We then use a non-linear simplified ocean model to do state estimation and drift prediction. The methods are rigorously compared using a wide range of metrics and skill scores. Our findings indicate that both methods succeed in approximating the Kalman filter reference for linear models of moderate dimensions, even for small ensemble sizes. However, in high-dimensional settings with a non-linear model, we discover that the outcomes are significantly influenced by the dependence of the ensemble Kalman filter on relaxation and the particle filter's sensitivity to the chosen model error covariance structure. Upon proper relaxation and localisation parametrisation, the ensemble Kalman filter version outperforms the particle filter in our experiments.
基于集合的稀疏海洋数据同化方法比较
海洋学应用中的概率预测,如用于搜救行动的漂流轨迹预测,面临着高维复杂模型和稀疏空间观测的挑战。我们讨论了同化稀疏点观测数据的本地化策略,并比较了隐式等权粒子滤波器和集合变换卡尔曼滤波器的本地化版本。首先,我们对照线性平流扩散模型的卡尔曼滤波解析解,对这些方法进行了全面验证。然后,我们使用非线性简化海洋模型进行状态估计和漂移预测。我们使用各种指标和技能评分对这些方法进行了严格比较。我们的研究结果表明,对于中等维度的线性模型,这两种方法都能成功逼近卡尔曼滤波参考值,甚至对于较小的集合规模也是如此。然而,在非线性模型的高维设置中,我们发现结果受到集合卡尔曼滤波器对松弛的依赖性以及粒子滤波器对所选模型误差协方差结构的敏感性的显著影响。在适当的松弛和定位参数化条件下,集合卡尔曼滤波器在我们的实验中优于粒子滤波器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society is a journal published by the Royal Meteorological Society. It aims to communicate and document new research in the atmospheric sciences and related fields. The journal is considered one of the leading publications in meteorology worldwide. It accepts articles, comprehensive review articles, and comments on published papers. It is published eight times a year, with additional special issues. The Quarterly Journal has a wide readership of scientists in the atmospheric and related fields. It is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Advanced Polymers Abstracts, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, CABDirect, COMPENDEX, CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts, Earthquake Engineering Abstracts, Engineered Materials Abstracts, Science Citation Index, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信