Atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients: Where do we stand in 2023? – State of the art review

Thomas F. Deering, Sandeep K. Goyal, Ashish A. Bhimani, Michael Hoosien, Ahmadreza Karimianpour, Kavita P. Krishnasamy, Kent R. Nilsson, Abdullah Omar, Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, Rakesh Gopinathannair, Aashish Katapadi, Christian Sohns
{"title":"Atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients: Where do we stand in 2023? – State of the art review","authors":"Thomas F. Deering, Sandeep K. Goyal, Ashish A. Bhimani, Michael Hoosien, Ahmadreza Karimianpour, Kavita P. Krishnasamy, Kent R. Nilsson, Abdullah Omar, Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, Rakesh Gopinathannair, Aashish Katapadi, Christian Sohns","doi":"10.1111/pace.14888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure are common overlapping cardiovascular disorders. Despite important therapeutic advances over the past several decades, controversy persists about whether a rate control or rhythm control approach constitutes the best option in this population. There is also considerable debate about whether antiarrhythmic drug therapy or ablation is the best approach when rhythm control is pursued. A brief historical examination of the literature addressing this issue will be performed. An analysis of several important clinical outcomes observed in the prospective, randomized studies, which have compared AF ablation to non-ablation treatment options, will be discussed. This review will conclude with recommendations to guide clinicians on the status of AF ablation as a treatment option when considering management options in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation.","PeriodicalId":19650,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure are common overlapping cardiovascular disorders. Despite important therapeutic advances over the past several decades, controversy persists about whether a rate control or rhythm control approach constitutes the best option in this population. There is also considerable debate about whether antiarrhythmic drug therapy or ablation is the best approach when rhythm control is pursued. A brief historical examination of the literature addressing this issue will be performed. An analysis of several important clinical outcomes observed in the prospective, randomized studies, which have compared AF ablation to non-ablation treatment options, will be discussed. This review will conclude with recommendations to guide clinicians on the status of AF ablation as a treatment option when considering management options in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation.
心力衰竭患者的心房颤动消融术:2023 年我们将何去何从?- 最新进展回顾
心房颤动(房颤)和心力衰竭是常见的重叠性心血管疾病。尽管在过去几十年中取得了重要的治疗进展,但关于心房颤动患者的最佳治疗方案是控制心率还是控制心律的争议依然存在。另外,在追求节律控制时,抗心律失常药物治疗还是消融治疗才是最佳方法也存在很大争议。我们将对有关这一问题的文献进行简要的历史回顾。将对前瞻性随机研究中观察到的几个重要临床结果进行分析,这些研究对房颤消融与非消融治疗方案进行了比较。本综述最后将提出建议,指导临床医生在考虑心房颤动心衰患者的治疗方案时将房颤消融作为一种治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信