Facilitator experiences of providing feedback of large quality and safety datasets to staff: A qualitative study

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Rebekkah Middleton , Denise Edgar , Emma Radbron , Val Wilson
{"title":"Facilitator experiences of providing feedback of large quality and safety datasets to staff: A qualitative study","authors":"Rebekkah Middleton ,&nbsp;Denise Edgar ,&nbsp;Emma Radbron ,&nbsp;Val Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2023.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Positive safety cultures are imperative for patient and staff outcomes. For transformation to occur in healthcare safety cultures, data should be collected at clinical, professional, and system levels and staff provided with the opportunity to review and take action. Feedback of such data, specifically large datasets, can be both difficult and confronting for those giving and receiving the information. As such, facilitation is a critical element of the feedback process that can ensure context is understood by those receiving feedback, strengths of the findings are outlined, and actions are forthcoming in response to the data.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To explore facilitator experiences, perceptions, and strategies employed when delivering feedback of large safety culture datasets to teams in a Local Health District in NSW Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An exploratory descriptive qualitative approach utilising thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Three themes relating to the purpose, processes, and outcomes of facilitated feedback.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Exploration of the themes demonstrated that when feedback is delivered by skilled facilitators in person-centred ways, reflection and understanding data are encouraged and skills developed in others.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Facilitation promoted positive action by healthcare staff in response to their findings, and the process of feedback resulted in enhanced expertise for facilitators.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 48-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769623001075/pdfft?md5=764be79c996f7d07ee97d622b2c5e02f&pid=1-s2.0-S1322769623001075-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769623001075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Positive safety cultures are imperative for patient and staff outcomes. For transformation to occur in healthcare safety cultures, data should be collected at clinical, professional, and system levels and staff provided with the opportunity to review and take action. Feedback of such data, specifically large datasets, can be both difficult and confronting for those giving and receiving the information. As such, facilitation is a critical element of the feedback process that can ensure context is understood by those receiving feedback, strengths of the findings are outlined, and actions are forthcoming in response to the data.

Aim

To explore facilitator experiences, perceptions, and strategies employed when delivering feedback of large safety culture datasets to teams in a Local Health District in NSW Australia.

Methods

An exploratory descriptive qualitative approach utilising thematic analysis.

Findings

Three themes relating to the purpose, processes, and outcomes of facilitated feedback.

Discussion

Exploration of the themes demonstrated that when feedback is delivered by skilled facilitators in person-centred ways, reflection and understanding data are encouraged and skills developed in others.

Conclusion

Facilitation promoted positive action by healthcare staff in response to their findings, and the process of feedback resulted in enhanced expertise for facilitators.

向员工提供大型质量与安全数据集反馈的促进者经验:定性研究
背景积极的安全文化对患者和员工的治疗效果至关重要。要实现医疗安全文化的转变,应在临床、专业和系统层面收集数据,并为员工提供审查和采取行动的机会。对于提供和接收信息的人员来说,反馈此类数据(尤其是大型数据集)可能既困难又困难。因此,引导是反馈过程中的一个关键因素,可以确保接受反馈的人员了解背景情况,概述调查结果的优点,并针对数据采取相应的行动。 目的探索澳大利亚新南威尔士州一个地方卫生区的团队在提供大型安全文化数据集反馈时引导者的经验、看法和策略。讨论对这些主题的探讨表明,当熟练的促进者以以人为本的方式提供反馈时,反思和对数据的理解会得到鼓励,其他人的技能也会得到发展。结论促进工作促进了医护人员针对其发现采取积极行动,反馈过程提高了促进者的专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信