A Best–Worst Scaling Study of the General Population's Preferences for Activities in Living Arrangements for Persons With Dementia

Christian Speckemeier, Carina Abels, Klemens Höfer, Anke Walendzik, Jürgen Wasem, Silke Neusser
{"title":"A Best–Worst Scaling Study of the General Population's Preferences for Activities in Living Arrangements for Persons With Dementia","authors":"Christian Speckemeier, Carina Abels, Klemens Höfer, Anke Walendzik, Jürgen Wasem, Silke Neusser","doi":"10.1007/s40271-023-00661-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Activity involvement is a central element of dementia care. However, few studies have examined preferences for types of activities for persons who may be in need of care in the future. In this study, a best–worst scaling (BWS) was conducted to gather insights on preferred activities in small-scale living arrangements for dementia in the general population aged 50–65 years from rural and urban regions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>BWS tasks were developed based on literature searches and focus groups. The final BWS contains ten activities, namely ‘interaction with animals’, ‘gardening’, ‘painting, handicrafts, manual activities’, ‘household activities (e.g., folding laundry, cooking)’, ‘watching television’, ‘practicing religion’, ‘listening to music and singing familiar songs’, ‘conversations about the past’, ‘walks and excursions’, ‘sport activities (e.g., gymnastics)’. Each participant had to fill out subsets of four objects each and identify them as best and worst. A postal survey was sent to a total of 4390 persons from rural and urban regions aged between 50 and 65 years. Results were analyzed by count analysis and logit models. It was examined if preferences differ with respect to gender, religiousness, and informal caregiving experience.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 840 questionnaires were returned, and 627 surveys were included in the analysis. In the rural sample, the highest relative importance (RI) was assigned to ‘walks and excursions’ (RI: 100%), ‘sport activities (e.g., gymnastics)’ (RI: 56%), ‘gardening’ (RI: 28%), and ‘interaction with animals’ (26%). In the urban sample, ‘walks and excursions’ (RI: 100%), ‘sport activities (e.g., gymnastics)’ (RI: 37%), ‘interaction with animals’ (25%) and ‘gardening’ (RI: 22%) were perceived as most important. In both groups, household activities and practicing religion were of lowest importance. Importance ranks differed between subgroups. Results of the logit models with random effects showed the same order as results from the count analyses.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Discussion</h3><p>Our findings show that respondents generally favored activities with an outdoor component, while the household activities that are part of many concepts were of low importance to respondents. Thus, our study can inform the design of a preference-based specific range of activities in small-scale living arrangements for dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":501651,"journal":{"name":"The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-023-00661-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Activity involvement is a central element of dementia care. However, few studies have examined preferences for types of activities for persons who may be in need of care in the future. In this study, a best–worst scaling (BWS) was conducted to gather insights on preferred activities in small-scale living arrangements for dementia in the general population aged 50–65 years from rural and urban regions.

Methods

BWS tasks were developed based on literature searches and focus groups. The final BWS contains ten activities, namely ‘interaction with animals’, ‘gardening’, ‘painting, handicrafts, manual activities’, ‘household activities (e.g., folding laundry, cooking)’, ‘watching television’, ‘practicing religion’, ‘listening to music and singing familiar songs’, ‘conversations about the past’, ‘walks and excursions’, ‘sport activities (e.g., gymnastics)’. Each participant had to fill out subsets of four objects each and identify them as best and worst. A postal survey was sent to a total of 4390 persons from rural and urban regions aged between 50 and 65 years. Results were analyzed by count analysis and logit models. It was examined if preferences differ with respect to gender, religiousness, and informal caregiving experience.

Results

A total of 840 questionnaires were returned, and 627 surveys were included in the analysis. In the rural sample, the highest relative importance (RI) was assigned to ‘walks and excursions’ (RI: 100%), ‘sport activities (e.g., gymnastics)’ (RI: 56%), ‘gardening’ (RI: 28%), and ‘interaction with animals’ (26%). In the urban sample, ‘walks and excursions’ (RI: 100%), ‘sport activities (e.g., gymnastics)’ (RI: 37%), ‘interaction with animals’ (25%) and ‘gardening’ (RI: 22%) were perceived as most important. In both groups, household activities and practicing religion were of lowest importance. Importance ranks differed between subgroups. Results of the logit models with random effects showed the same order as results from the count analyses.

Discussion

Our findings show that respondents generally favored activities with an outdoor component, while the household activities that are part of many concepts were of low importance to respondents. Thus, our study can inform the design of a preference-based specific range of activities in small-scale living arrangements for dementia.

Abstract Image

关于普通人群对痴呆症患者生活安排活动偏好的最佳-最差比例研究
背景参与活动是痴呆症护理的核心要素。然而,很少有研究对未来可能需要护理的人的活动类型偏好进行调查。在这项研究中,我们进行了一项最佳-最差评分(BWS),以收集来自农村和城市地区 50-65 岁普通人群对痴呆症小型生活安排中首选活动的见解。最终的 BWS 包括十项活动,即 "与动物互动"、"园艺"、"绘画、手工艺、手工活动"、"家务活动(如叠衣服、做饭)"、"看电视"、"宗教活动"、"听音乐和唱熟悉的歌曲"、"谈论过去"、"散步和远足"、"体育活动(如体操)"。每位参与者都必须填写每组四个对象的子集,并将其分为最好和最差。我们向来自农村和城市地区的 4390 名年龄在 50 岁至 65 岁之间的人进行了邮寄调查。调查结果通过计数分析和对数模型进行了分析。结果 共收回 840 份问卷,其中 627 份被纳入分析。在农村样本中,"散步和远足"(RI:100%)、"体育活动(如体操)"(RI:56%)、"园艺"(RI:28%)和 "与动物互动"(26%)的相对重要性最高。在城市样本中,"散步和远足"(地区指标:100%)、"体育活动(如体操)"(地区指标: 37%)、"与动物交往"(25%)和 "园艺"(地区指标:22%)被认为是最重要的。在这两个群体中,家务活动和宗教活动的重要性最低。各分组的重要程度不同。我们的研究结果表明,受访者普遍倾向于户外活动,而作为许多概念组成部分的家务活动对受访者的重要性较低。因此,我们的研究可以为设计基于偏好的痴呆症患者小规模生活安排的具体活动范围提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信