A frontier-based parametric framework for exploring the competition–efficiency nexus in commercial banking: insights from an emerging economy

IF 1.9 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Bhavya Srivastava, Shveta Singh, Sonali Jain
{"title":"A frontier-based parametric framework for exploring the competition–efficiency nexus in commercial banking: insights from an emerging economy","authors":"Bhavya Srivastava, Shveta Singh, Sonali Jain","doi":"10.1108/mf-07-2023-0445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The present study assesses the commercial bank profit efficiency and its relationship to banking sector competition in a rapidly growing emerging economy, India from 2009 to 2019 using stochastic frontier analysis (SFA).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Lerner indices, conventional and efficiency-adjusted, quantify competition. Two SFA models are employed to calculate alternative profit efficiency (inefficiency) scores: the two-step time-decay approach proposed by Battese and Coelli (1992) and the recently developed single-step pairwise difference estimator (PDE) by Belotti and Ilardi (2018). In the first step of the BC92 framework, profit inefficiency is calculated, and in the second step, Tobit and Fractional Regression Model (FRM) are utilized to evaluate profit inefficiency correlates. PDE concurrently solves the frontier and inefficiency equations using the maximum likelihood process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results suggest that foreign banks are less profit efficient than domestic equivalents, supporting the “home-field advantage” hypothesis in India. Further, increasing competition drives bank managers to make riskier lending and investment choices, decreasing bank profit efficiency. However, this effect varies depending on bank ownership and size.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Literature on the competition bank efficiency link is conspicuously scant, with a focus on technical and cost efficiency. Less is known regarding the influence of competition on bank profit efficiency. The article is one of the first to examine commercial bank profit efficiency and its relationship to banking sector competition. Additionally, the study work represents one of the first applications of the FRM presented by Papke and Wooldridge (1996) and the PDE provided by Belotti and Ilardi (2018).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":18140,"journal":{"name":"Managerial Finance","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-07-2023-0445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The present study assesses the commercial bank profit efficiency and its relationship to banking sector competition in a rapidly growing emerging economy, India from 2009 to 2019 using stochastic frontier analysis (SFA).

Design/methodology/approach

Lerner indices, conventional and efficiency-adjusted, quantify competition. Two SFA models are employed to calculate alternative profit efficiency (inefficiency) scores: the two-step time-decay approach proposed by Battese and Coelli (1992) and the recently developed single-step pairwise difference estimator (PDE) by Belotti and Ilardi (2018). In the first step of the BC92 framework, profit inefficiency is calculated, and in the second step, Tobit and Fractional Regression Model (FRM) are utilized to evaluate profit inefficiency correlates. PDE concurrently solves the frontier and inefficiency equations using the maximum likelihood process.

Findings

The results suggest that foreign banks are less profit efficient than domestic equivalents, supporting the “home-field advantage” hypothesis in India. Further, increasing competition drives bank managers to make riskier lending and investment choices, decreasing bank profit efficiency. However, this effect varies depending on bank ownership and size.

Originality/value

Literature on the competition bank efficiency link is conspicuously scant, with a focus on technical and cost efficiency. Less is known regarding the influence of competition on bank profit efficiency. The article is one of the first to examine commercial bank profit efficiency and its relationship to banking sector competition. Additionally, the study work represents one of the first applications of the FRM presented by Papke and Wooldridge (1996) and the PDE provided by Belotti and Ilardi (2018).

探索商业银行竞争与效率关系的前沿参数框架:一个新兴经济体的启示
本研究采用随机前沿分析法(SFA),评估了 2009 年至 2019 年印度这一快速增长的新兴经济体中商业银行的利润效率及其与银行业竞争的关系。采用两种 SFA 模型来计算替代利润效率(无效率)得分:Battese 和 Coelli(1992 年)提出的两步时间衰减法以及 Belotti 和 Ilardi(2018 年)最近开发的单步成对差异估计法(PDE)。在 BC92 框架的第一步中,计算利润无效率,在第二步中,利用 Tobit 和分数回归模型(FRM)评估利润无效率相关性。结果表明,外资银行的利润效率低于国内银行,这支持了印度的 "主场优势 "假说。此外,日益激烈的竞争促使银行经理做出风险更大的贷款和投资选择,从而降低了银行的利润效率。原创性/价值有关竞争与银行效率联系的文献明显很少,主要集中在技术和成本效率方面。关于竞争对银行利润效率影响的研究则较少。本文是最早研究商业银行利润效率及其与银行业竞争关系的文章之一。此外,这项研究工作也是 Papke 和 Wooldridge(1996 年)提出的 FRM 以及 Belotti 和 Ilardi(2018 年)提供的 PDE 的首次应用之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Managerial Finance
Managerial Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Managerial Finance provides an international forum for the publication of high quality and topical research in the area of finance, such as corporate finance, financial management, financial markets and institutions, international finance, banking, insurance and risk management, real estate and financial education. Theoretical and empirical research is welcome as well as cross-disciplinary work, such as papers investigating the relationship of finance with other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信