Validation of prognostic and predictive value of total tumoral load after primary systemic therapy in breast cancer using OSNA assay

Laia Bernet-Vegué, Carolina Cantero-González, Magdalena Sancho de Salas, David Parada, Tiziana Perin, Zulma Quintero-Niño, Begoña Vieites Pérez-Quintela, Douglas Sánchez-Guzmán, Marina Castelvetere, David Hardisson Hernaez, María Dolores Martín-Salvago
{"title":"Validation of prognostic and predictive value of total tumoral load after primary systemic therapy in breast cancer using OSNA assay","authors":"Laia Bernet-Vegué, Carolina Cantero-González, Magdalena Sancho de Salas, David Parada, Tiziana Perin, Zulma Quintero-Niño, Begoña Vieites Pérez-Quintela, Douglas Sánchez-Guzmán, Marina Castelvetere, David Hardisson Hernaez, María Dolores Martín-Salvago","doi":"10.1007/s12094-023-03347-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to validate the classification of breast cancer (BC) patients in progression risk groups based on total tumor load (TTL) value to predict lymph node (LN) affectation after neo-adjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) obtained in the NEOVATTL study.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods/patients</h3><p>This was an observational, retrospective, international, multicenter study including patients with infiltrating BC who received NAST followed by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) analyzed with one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) from nine Spanish and two Italian hospitals. Patients were classified into three groups according to the progression risk, measured as disease-free survival (DFS), based on TTL values (&gt; 250, 250–25,000, and &gt; 25,000 copies/μL). The previous (NEOVATTL study) Cox regression model for prognosis was validated using prognostic index (PI) and Log ratio test (LRT) analyses; the value of TTL for axillary non-SLN affectation was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We included 263 patients with a mean age of 51.4 (± SD 10.5) years. Patients with TTL &gt; 25,000 copies/μL had a shorter DFS (HR 3.561 [95% CI 1.693−7.489], <i>p</i> = 0.0008 vs. TTL ≤ 25,000). PI and LRT analyses showed no differences between the two cohorts (<i>p</i> = 0.2553 and <i>p</i> = 0.226, respectively). ROC analysis showed concordance between TTL and non-SLN involvement (area under the curve 0.828), with 95.7% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity at a TTL cut-off of &gt; 15,000 copies/μL.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>In BC patients who had received NAST and underwent SLNB analysis using OSNA, a TTL value of &gt; 25,000 copies/μL was associated with a higher progression risk and &gt; 15,000 copies/μL was predictive of non-SLN involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":10166,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Oncology","volume":"45 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03347-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to validate the classification of breast cancer (BC) patients in progression risk groups based on total tumor load (TTL) value to predict lymph node (LN) affectation after neo-adjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) obtained in the NEOVATTL study.

Methods/patients

This was an observational, retrospective, international, multicenter study including patients with infiltrating BC who received NAST followed by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) analyzed with one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) from nine Spanish and two Italian hospitals. Patients were classified into three groups according to the progression risk, measured as disease-free survival (DFS), based on TTL values (> 250, 250–25,000, and > 25,000 copies/μL). The previous (NEOVATTL study) Cox regression model for prognosis was validated using prognostic index (PI) and Log ratio test (LRT) analyses; the value of TTL for axillary non-SLN affectation was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

We included 263 patients with a mean age of 51.4 (± SD 10.5) years. Patients with TTL > 25,000 copies/μL had a shorter DFS (HR 3.561 [95% CI 1.693−7.489], p = 0.0008 vs. TTL ≤ 25,000). PI and LRT analyses showed no differences between the two cohorts (p = 0.2553 and p = 0.226, respectively). ROC analysis showed concordance between TTL and non-SLN involvement (area under the curve 0.828), with 95.7% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity at a TTL cut-off of > 15,000 copies/μL.

Conclusions

In BC patients who had received NAST and underwent SLNB analysis using OSNA, a TTL value of > 25,000 copies/μL was associated with a higher progression risk and > 15,000 copies/μL was predictive of non-SLN involvement.

Abstract Image

利用 OSNA 检测法验证乳腺癌初次系统治疗后总肿瘤负荷的预后和预测价值
目的本研究旨在验证基于总肿瘤负荷(TTL)值的乳腺癌(BC)患者进展风险组别分类,以预测 NEOVATTL 研究中获得的新辅助全身治疗(NAST)后淋巴结(LN)受影响的情况。方法/患者这是一项观察性、回顾性、国际多中心研究,包括来自西班牙九家医院和意大利两家医院的浸润性BC患者,他们在接受NAST治疗后进行了前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB),并进行了一步核酸扩增(OSNA)分析。根据 TTL 值(250、250-25,000 和 25,000 拷贝/μL),以无疾病生存期(DFS)为衡量标准,将患者按疾病进展风险分为三组。使用预后指数(PI)和对数比值检验(LRT)分析验证了先前的(NEOVATTL 研究)Cox 回归预后模型;使用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)评估了 TTL 对腋窝非淋巴结影响的价值。TTL>25,000拷贝/μL的患者DFS较短(HR 3.561 [95% CI 1.693-7.489], p = 0.0008 vs. TTL ≤ 25,000)。PI 和 LRT 分析表明,两个组群之间没有差异(分别为 p = 0.2553 和 p = 0.226)。ROC分析显示,TTL与非SLN受累之间存在一致性(曲线下面积为0.828),在TTL临界值为> 15,000拷贝/μL时,灵敏度为95.7%,特异度为92.9%。结论在接受过NAST并使用OSNA进行SLNB分析的BC患者中,TTL值为> 25,000拷贝/μL与较高的进展风险相关,而> 15,000拷贝/μL可预测非SLN受累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信