Background grid extraction from historical hand-drawn cadastral maps

IF 1.8 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Tauseef Iftikhar, Nazar Khan
{"title":"Background grid extraction from historical hand-drawn cadastral maps","authors":"Tauseef Iftikhar, Nazar Khan","doi":"10.1007/s10032-023-00457-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We tackle a novel problem of detecting background grids in hand-drawn cadastral maps. Grid extraction is necessary for accessing and contextualizing the actual map content. The problem is challenging since the background grid is the bottommost map layer that is severely occluded by subsequent map layers. We present a novel automatic method for robust, bottom-up extraction of background grid structures in historical cadastral maps. The proposed algorithm extracts grid structures under significant occlusion, missing information, and noise by iteratively providing an increasingly refined estimate of the grid structure. The key idea is to exploit periodicity of background grid lines to corroborate the existence of each other. We also present an automatic scheme for determining the ‘gridness’ of any detected grid so that the proposed method self-evaluates its result as being good or poor without using ground truth. We present empirical evidence to show that the proposed gridness measure is a good indicator of quality. On a dataset of 268 historical cadastral maps with resolution <span>\\(1424\\times 2136\\)</span> pixels, the proposed method detects grids in 247 images yielding an average root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 5.0 pixels and average intersection over union (IoU) of 0.990. On grids self-evaluated as being good, we report average RMSE of 4.39 pixels and average IoU of 0.991. To compare with the proposed bottom-up approach, we also develop three increasingly sophisticated top-down algorithms based on RANSAC-based model fitting. Experimental results show that our bottom-up algorithm yields better results than the top-down algorithms. We also demonstrate that using detected background grids for stitching different maps is visually better than both manual and SURF-based stitching.</p>","PeriodicalId":50277,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10032-023-00457-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We tackle a novel problem of detecting background grids in hand-drawn cadastral maps. Grid extraction is necessary for accessing and contextualizing the actual map content. The problem is challenging since the background grid is the bottommost map layer that is severely occluded by subsequent map layers. We present a novel automatic method for robust, bottom-up extraction of background grid structures in historical cadastral maps. The proposed algorithm extracts grid structures under significant occlusion, missing information, and noise by iteratively providing an increasingly refined estimate of the grid structure. The key idea is to exploit periodicity of background grid lines to corroborate the existence of each other. We also present an automatic scheme for determining the ‘gridness’ of any detected grid so that the proposed method self-evaluates its result as being good or poor without using ground truth. We present empirical evidence to show that the proposed gridness measure is a good indicator of quality. On a dataset of 268 historical cadastral maps with resolution \(1424\times 2136\) pixels, the proposed method detects grids in 247 images yielding an average root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 5.0 pixels and average intersection over union (IoU) of 0.990. On grids self-evaluated as being good, we report average RMSE of 4.39 pixels and average IoU of 0.991. To compare with the proposed bottom-up approach, we also develop three increasingly sophisticated top-down algorithms based on RANSAC-based model fitting. Experimental results show that our bottom-up algorithm yields better results than the top-down algorithms. We also demonstrate that using detected background grids for stitching different maps is visually better than both manual and SURF-based stitching.

Abstract Image

从历史手绘地籍图中提取背景网格
我们要解决的新问题是检测手绘地籍图中的背景网格。网格提取是访问实际地图内容并将其上下文化的必要条件。由于背景网格是最底层的地图图层,被后续地图图层严重遮挡,因此该问题具有挑战性。我们提出了一种新颖的自动方法,用于自下而上提取历史地籍图中的背景网格结构。所提出的算法通过迭代提供越来越精细的网格结构估计值,在严重遮挡、信息缺失和噪声的情况下提取网格结构。其关键思路是利用背景网格线的周期性来证实彼此的存在。我们还提出了一种自动方案,用于确定任何检测到的网格的 "网格度",这样所提出的方法就能在不使用地面实况的情况下,自我评估其结果的好坏。我们提出的经验证据表明,所提出的网格度量是一个很好的质量指标。在一个包含 268 幅历史地籍图(分辨率为 1424×2136 像素)的数据集上,所提出的方法在 247 幅图像中检测到了网格,平均均方根误差(RMSE)为 5.0 像素,平均交集大于联合(IoU)为 0.990。对于自我评估为良好的网格,我们报告的平均 RMSE 为 4.39 像素,平均 IoU 为 0.991。为了与自下而上的方法进行比较,我们还基于基于 RANSAC 的模型拟合开发了三种日益复杂的自上而下算法。实验结果表明,我们的自下而上算法比自上而下算法产生了更好的结果。我们还证明,使用检测到的背景网格来拼接不同的地图在视觉效果上要好于手动拼接和基于 SURF 的拼接。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition
International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The large number of existing documents and the production of a multitude of new ones every year raise important issues in efficient handling, retrieval and storage of these documents and the information which they contain. This has led to the emergence of new research domains dealing with the recognition by computers of the constituent elements of documents - including characters, symbols, text, lines, graphics, images, handwriting, signatures, etc. In addition, these new domains deal with automatic analyses of the overall physical and logical structures of documents, with the ultimate objective of a high-level understanding of their semantic content. We have also seen renewed interest in optical character recognition (OCR) and handwriting recognition during the last decade. Document analysis and recognition are obviously the next stage. Automatic, intelligent processing of documents is at the intersections of many fields of research, especially of computer vision, image analysis, pattern recognition and artificial intelligence, as well as studies on reading, handwriting and linguistics. Although quality document related publications continue to appear in journals dedicated to these domains, the community will benefit from having this journal as a focal point for archival literature dedicated to document analysis and recognition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信