Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Giacomo Sermonesi, Brian W. C. A. Tian, Carlo Vallicelli, Fikri M. Abu‑Zidan, Dimitris Damaskos, Michael Denis Kelly, Ari Leppäniemi, Joseph M. Galante, Edward Tan, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick, Vladimir Khokha, Oreste Marco Romeo, Mircea Chirica, Manos Pikoulis, Andrey Litvin, Vishal Girishchandra Shelat, Boris Sakakushev, Imtiaz Wani, Ibrahima Sall, Paola Fugazzola, Enrico Cicuttin, Adriana Toro, Francesco Amico, Francesca Dal Mas, Belinda De Simone, Michael Sugrue, Luigi Bonavina, Giampiero Campanelli, Paolo Carcoforo, Lorenzo Cobianchi, Federico Coccolini, Massimo Chiarugi, Isidoro Di Carlo, Salomone Di Saverio, Mauro Podda, Michele Pisano, Massimo Sartelli, Mario Testini, Andreas Fette, Sandro Rizoli, Edoardo Picetti, Dieter Weber, Rifat Latifi, Yoram Kluger, Zsolt Janos Balogh, Walter Biffl, Hans Jeekel, Ian Civil, Andreas Hecker, Luca Ansaloni, Francesca Bravi, Vanni Agnoletti, Solomon Gurmu Beka, Ernest Eugene Moore, Fausto Catena
{"title":"Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma","authors":"Giacomo Sermonesi, Brian W. C. A. Tian, Carlo Vallicelli, Fikri M. Abu‑Zidan, Dimitris Damaskos, Michael Denis Kelly, Ari Leppäniemi, Joseph M. Galante, Edward Tan, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick, Vladimir Khokha, Oreste Marco Romeo, Mircea Chirica, Manos Pikoulis, Andrey Litvin, Vishal Girishchandra Shelat, Boris Sakakushev, Imtiaz Wani, Ibrahima Sall, Paola Fugazzola, Enrico Cicuttin, Adriana Toro, Francesco Amico, Francesca Dal Mas, Belinda De Simone, Michael Sugrue, Luigi Bonavina, Giampiero Campanelli, Paolo Carcoforo, Lorenzo Cobianchi, Federico Coccolini, Massimo Chiarugi, Isidoro Di Carlo, Salomone Di Saverio, Mauro Podda, Michele Pisano, Massimo Sartelli, Mario Testini, Andreas Fette, Sandro Rizoli, Edoardo Picetti, Dieter Weber, Rifat Latifi, Yoram Kluger, Zsolt Janos Balogh, Walter Biffl, Hans Jeekel, Ian Civil, Andreas Hecker, Luca Ansaloni, Francesca Bravi, Vanni Agnoletti, Solomon Gurmu Beka, Ernest Eugene Moore, Fausto Catena","doi":"10.1186/s13017-023-00520-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Laparoscopy is widely adopted across nearly all surgical subspecialties in the elective setting. Initially finding indication in minor abdominal emergencies, it has gradually become the standard approach in the majority of elective general surgery procedures. Despite many technological advances and increasing acceptance, the laparoscopic approach remains underutilized in emergency general surgery and in abdominal trauma. Emergency laparotomy continues to carry a high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been a growing interest from emergency and trauma surgeons in adopting minimally invasive surgery approaches in the acute surgical setting. The present position paper, supported by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), aims to provide a review of the literature to reach a consensus on the indications and benefits of a laparoscopic-first approach in patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies or abdominal trauma. This position paper was developed according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee performed the literature review and drafted the position paper. An international panel of 54 experts then critically revised the manuscript and discussed it in detail, to develop a consensus on a position statement. A total of 323 studies (systematic review and meta-analysis, randomized clinical trial, retrospective comparative cohort studies, case series) have been selected from an initial pool of 7409 studies. Evidence demonstrates several benefits of the laparoscopic approach in stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgical emergencies or abdominal trauma. The selection of a stable patient seems to be of paramount importance for a safe adoption of a laparoscopic approach. In hemodynamically stable patients, the laparoscopic approach was found to be safe, feasible and effective as a therapeutic tool or helpful to identify further management steps and needs, resulting in improved outcomes, regardless of conversion. Appropriate patient selection, surgeon experience and rigorous minimally invasive surgical training, remain crucial factors to increase the adoption of laparoscopy in emergency general surgery and abdominal trauma. The WSES expert panel suggests laparoscopy as the first approach for stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00520-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laparoscopy is widely adopted across nearly all surgical subspecialties in the elective setting. Initially finding indication in minor abdominal emergencies, it has gradually become the standard approach in the majority of elective general surgery procedures. Despite many technological advances and increasing acceptance, the laparoscopic approach remains underutilized in emergency general surgery and in abdominal trauma. Emergency laparotomy continues to carry a high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been a growing interest from emergency and trauma surgeons in adopting minimally invasive surgery approaches in the acute surgical setting. The present position paper, supported by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), aims to provide a review of the literature to reach a consensus on the indications and benefits of a laparoscopic-first approach in patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies or abdominal trauma. This position paper was developed according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee performed the literature review and drafted the position paper. An international panel of 54 experts then critically revised the manuscript and discussed it in detail, to develop a consensus on a position statement. A total of 323 studies (systematic review and meta-analysis, randomized clinical trial, retrospective comparative cohort studies, case series) have been selected from an initial pool of 7409 studies. Evidence demonstrates several benefits of the laparoscopic approach in stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgical emergencies or abdominal trauma. The selection of a stable patient seems to be of paramount importance for a safe adoption of a laparoscopic approach. In hemodynamically stable patients, the laparoscopic approach was found to be safe, feasible and effective as a therapeutic tool or helpful to identify further management steps and needs, resulting in improved outcomes, regardless of conversion. Appropriate patient selection, surgeon experience and rigorous minimally invasive surgical training, remain crucial factors to increase the adoption of laparoscopy in emergency general surgery and abdominal trauma. The WSES expert panel suggests laparoscopy as the first approach for stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.
切塞纳指南:WSES 关于普外科急诊和腹部创伤的腹腔镜先行方法的共识声明
在择期手术中,几乎所有外科亚专科都广泛采用了腹腔镜手术。腹腔镜手术最初适用于腹部小急症,现在已逐渐成为大多数普外科择期手术的标准方法。尽管腹腔镜方法在技术上取得了许多进步,并被越来越多的人所接受,但在急诊普外科和腹部创伤中仍未得到充分利用。急诊开腹手术的发病率和死亡率仍然很高。近年来,急诊和创伤外科医生对在急诊手术环境中采用微创手术方法的兴趣与日俱增。本立场文件得到了世界急诊外科协会(WSES)的支持,旨在对文献进行综述,以便就普外科急诊或腹部创伤需要急诊腹部手术的患者采用腹腔镜先行手术的适应症和益处达成共识。本立场文件是根据 WSES 方法编写的。指导委员会进行了文献综述并起草了立场文件。随后,由 54 位专家组成的国际小组对稿件进行了严格的修改和详细的讨论,并就立场声明达成了共识。从最初的 7409 项研究中,共筛选出 323 项研究(系统综述和荟萃分析、随机临床试验、回顾性比较队列研究、病例系列研究)。有证据表明,对于因普通外科急症或腹部创伤而接受急诊腹部手术的稳定期患者,腹腔镜方法具有多种优势。选择病情稳定的病人对于安全采用腹腔镜方法似乎至关重要。在血流动力学稳定的患者中,腹腔镜方法被认为是安全、可行和有效的治疗工具,或有助于确定进一步的管理步骤和需求,从而改善治疗效果,无论是否需要转院。适当的患者选择、外科医生的经验和严格的微创手术培训仍是在急诊普外科和腹部创伤中更多采用腹腔镜手术的关键因素。WSES 专家小组建议,对于接受急诊腹部手术的稳定期普外科急诊患者和腹部创伤患者,应首先采用腹腔镜手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
World Journal of Emergency Surgery EMERGENCY MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Emergency Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal covering all facets of clinical and basic research in traumatic and non-traumatic emergency surgery and related fields. Topics include emergency surgery, acute care surgery, trauma surgery, intensive care, trauma management, and resuscitation, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信