Association between direct oral anticoagulant concentrations and clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Brandon Stretton , Philip Harford , Joshua Kovoor , Stephen Bacchi , Aashray Gupta , Jaspreet Sandhu , Hollie Moran , Suzanne Edwards , Jonathon Henry W. Jacobsen , Guy Maddern , Mark Boyd
{"title":"Association between direct oral anticoagulant concentrations and clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Brandon Stretton ,&nbsp;Philip Harford ,&nbsp;Joshua Kovoor ,&nbsp;Stephen Bacchi ,&nbsp;Aashray Gupta ,&nbsp;Jaspreet Sandhu ,&nbsp;Hollie Moran ,&nbsp;Suzanne Edwards ,&nbsp;Jonathon Henry W. Jacobsen ,&nbsp;Guy Maddern ,&nbsp;Mark Boyd","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Current guidelines suggest preoperative direct oral anticoagulant levels of &lt; 30–50 ng/ml. However, there is limited evidence to guide this expert consensus. Reviewing assay titres and clinical outcomes may be able to inform perioperative care of the anticoagulated patient. This review aimed to determine whether DOAC assay plasma concentrations are associated with bleeding or systemic embolic events to better appreciate a possible therapeutic or hazardous reference range.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Systematic search, performed by an information specialist using a peer-reviewed search. Main search concepts were direct oral anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism. Data synthesised in narrative and tabular format whilst data that could be pooled was subjected to meta-analysis, using a random effects model. Meta regression was conducted for DOAC peak levels and clinical events. PRISMA guidelines were adhered to.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 6717 retrieved publications, a total of 17 studies were included in the systematic review and 14 in the meta-analysis/regression. Studies report clinical outcome follow up ranging from 28 to 128 weeks. For every 10 ng/ml increase in DOAC assay trough and peak levels, the mean number of bleeding cases increases by 0.03(95 %CI: –0.32 –0.38, <em>P</em> = 0.84) and 0.09(95 %CI: –3.4 –5.3, <em>P</em> = 0.55) respectively, the mean number of major bleed cases increases by 0.01(95 %CI: –0.05 –0.07, <em>P</em> = 0.62) and 0.011(95 %CI: –0.32 –0.34, <em>P</em> = 0.74) respectively and the mean number of systemic embolic event cases decreases by 0.00039(95 %CI: –0.06 –0.0054, <em>P</em> = 0.88) and 0.04(95 %CI: –0.56 –0.48, <em>P</em> = 0.77) respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There exists no significant, independent relationship, as determined by a univariate meta regression, between DOAC assay concentrations and a patient's risk of bleeding or systemic embolic embolism. This review also highlights the possibility of an absolute, patient specific DOAC assay concentration that may indicate adequate anticoagulation, above which further increases do not confer an increased risk of bleeding. However, further research to characterise this and its utility in the perioperative setting is required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000761/pdfft?md5=1e85e8f844c1c4eeefc625019c2f54e8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262023000761-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Current guidelines suggest preoperative direct oral anticoagulant levels of < 30–50 ng/ml. However, there is limited evidence to guide this expert consensus. Reviewing assay titres and clinical outcomes may be able to inform perioperative care of the anticoagulated patient. This review aimed to determine whether DOAC assay plasma concentrations are associated with bleeding or systemic embolic events to better appreciate a possible therapeutic or hazardous reference range.

Methods

Systematic search, performed by an information specialist using a peer-reviewed search. Main search concepts were direct oral anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism. Data synthesised in narrative and tabular format whilst data that could be pooled was subjected to meta-analysis, using a random effects model. Meta regression was conducted for DOAC peak levels and clinical events. PRISMA guidelines were adhered to.

Results

Of 6717 retrieved publications, a total of 17 studies were included in the systematic review and 14 in the meta-analysis/regression. Studies report clinical outcome follow up ranging from 28 to 128 weeks. For every 10 ng/ml increase in DOAC assay trough and peak levels, the mean number of bleeding cases increases by 0.03(95 %CI: –0.32 –0.38, P = 0.84) and 0.09(95 %CI: –3.4 –5.3, P = 0.55) respectively, the mean number of major bleed cases increases by 0.01(95 %CI: –0.05 –0.07, P = 0.62) and 0.011(95 %CI: –0.32 –0.34, P = 0.74) respectively and the mean number of systemic embolic event cases decreases by 0.00039(95 %CI: –0.06 –0.0054, P = 0.88) and 0.04(95 %CI: –0.56 –0.48, P = 0.77) respectively.

Conclusion

There exists no significant, independent relationship, as determined by a univariate meta regression, between DOAC assay concentrations and a patient's risk of bleeding or systemic embolic embolism. This review also highlights the possibility of an absolute, patient specific DOAC assay concentration that may indicate adequate anticoagulation, above which further increases do not confer an increased risk of bleeding. However, further research to characterise this and its utility in the perioperative setting is required.

直接口服抗凝剂浓度与临床结果之间的关系:系统回顾与荟萃分析
导言目前的指南建议术前直接口服抗凝剂水平为 30-50 纳克/毫升。然而,指导这一专家共识的证据有限。对检测滴度和临床结果进行回顾可为抗凝患者的围手术期护理提供参考。本综述旨在确定 DOAC 检测血浆浓度是否与出血或全身性栓塞事件有关,以便更好地了解可能的治疗或危险参考范围。主要检索概念为心房颤动或静脉血栓栓塞的直接口服抗凝疗法。数据以叙述和表格的形式进行综合,而可以汇总的数据则采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。对 DOAC 峰值水平和临床事件进行了元回归。结果 在检索到的 6717 篇文献中,共有 17 项研究被纳入系统综述,14 项研究被纳入元分析/回归。研究报告的临床结果随访时间从 28 周到 128 周不等。DOAC 检测谷值和峰值水平每增加 10 ng/ml,出血病例的平均数量分别增加 0.03(95 %CI:-0.32 -0.38,P = 0.84)和 0.09(95 %CI:-3.4 -5.3,P = 0.55),大出血病例的平均数量分别增加 0.01(95 %CI:-0.05 -0.07,P = 0.62)和 0.011(95 %CI:-0.32 -0.34,P = 0.结论通过单变量元回归确定,DOAC 检测浓度与患者出血或全身性栓塞风险之间不存在显著的独立关系。本综述还强调了一种可能性,即患者特定的 DOAC 检测浓度可能表明抗凝充分,超过这一浓度不会增加出血风险。不过,还需要进一步研究以确定其特征及其在围手术期环境中的用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信