Reconsidering conservative treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothoraces: A case report

Khalid Zahalka , Tabea Haas-Heger , Ben Balogun-Ojuri
{"title":"Reconsidering conservative treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothoraces: A case report","authors":"Khalid Zahalka ,&nbsp;Tabea Haas-Heger ,&nbsp;Ben Balogun-Ojuri","doi":"10.1016/j.jemrpt.2023.100063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Interventional management for primary spontaneous pneumothoraces (PSPs) appears to have become the norm, with conservative management having been pushed into the background over the past few decades. In the UK, management of PSPs is guided by the British Thoracic Society (BTS) Guidelines. While original guidance, dating back to 2011, favoured interventional management, the newly released updated BTS algorithm has given the conservative approach greater visibility.</p></div><div><h3>Case report</h3><p>A teenager presented to the Emergency Department after having developed sudden onset chest discomfort. A chest x-ray confirmed a PSP. He was admitted and initially treated conservatively. After 24 hours of observation, a chest drain was inserted on the basis of a lack of radiologic improvement. On discharge after chest drain removal, he was found to have a recurrence of his pneumothorax when reviewed at the outpatient respiratory clinic. He was again managed conservatively, this time successfully.</p></div><div><h3>Why should the emergency physician be aware of this?</h3><p>This case raised several questions regarding the management of stable patients presenting with PSP. The body of evidence supporting conservative management as a safe and feasible option has been growing. It is therefore important for physicians to reconsider its role and value. While the newly released BTS guidelines are a step in the right direction, there are a number of important questions to address in order to both effectively guide emergency physicians and for conservative management to be used in a more standardised and routine way.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73546,"journal":{"name":"JEM reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100063"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773232023000597/pdfft?md5=39a3406a5f86d44353fd9a0aa90c8f29&pid=1-s2.0-S2773232023000597-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEM reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773232023000597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Interventional management for primary spontaneous pneumothoraces (PSPs) appears to have become the norm, with conservative management having been pushed into the background over the past few decades. In the UK, management of PSPs is guided by the British Thoracic Society (BTS) Guidelines. While original guidance, dating back to 2011, favoured interventional management, the newly released updated BTS algorithm has given the conservative approach greater visibility.

Case report

A teenager presented to the Emergency Department after having developed sudden onset chest discomfort. A chest x-ray confirmed a PSP. He was admitted and initially treated conservatively. After 24 hours of observation, a chest drain was inserted on the basis of a lack of radiologic improvement. On discharge after chest drain removal, he was found to have a recurrence of his pneumothorax when reviewed at the outpatient respiratory clinic. He was again managed conservatively, this time successfully.

Why should the emergency physician be aware of this?

This case raised several questions regarding the management of stable patients presenting with PSP. The body of evidence supporting conservative management as a safe and feasible option has been growing. It is therefore important for physicians to reconsider its role and value. While the newly released BTS guidelines are a step in the right direction, there are a number of important questions to address in order to both effectively guide emergency physicians and for conservative management to be used in a more standardised and routine way.

重新考虑原发性自发性气胸的保守治疗:病例报告
背景原发性自发性气胸(PSPs)的介入治疗似乎已成为一种常态,而保守治疗在过去几十年中已被推到了风口浪尖。在英国,PSP 的治疗遵循英国胸科学会 (BTS) 指南。病例报告一名青少年在突发胸部不适后到急诊科就诊。胸部 X 光检查证实他患有 PSP。他被收治入院,起初接受保守治疗。经过 24 小时的观察后,由于放射学症状没有改善,医生为他插入了胸腔引流管。拔除胸腔引流管后出院,在呼吸科门诊复查时发现他的气胸复发。为什么急诊医生应该注意这一点?这个病例提出了几个关于如何治疗病情稳定的 PSP 患者的问题。越来越多的证据表明,保守治疗是一种安全可行的选择。因此,医生必须重新考虑保守治疗的作用和价值。虽然新发布的 BTS 指南是朝着正确方向迈出的一步,但仍有许多重要问题需要解决,以便为急诊医生提供有效指导,并使保守治疗更加标准化和常规化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JEM reports
JEM reports Emergency Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
54 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信