Comparison between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting multiple myeloma lesions in the skull: A systematic review

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Thaiza Goncalves Rocha, Carla Barros de Oliveira, Roberto José Pessoa de Magalhães Filho, Angelo Maiolino, Marcela Baraúna Magno, Davi da Silva Barbirato, Eduardo Murad Villoria, Lucianne Cople Maia, Sandra Regina Torres, Maria Augusta Visconti
{"title":"Comparison between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting multiple myeloma lesions in the skull: A systematic review","authors":"Thaiza Goncalves Rocha, Carla Barros de Oliveira, Roberto José Pessoa de Magalhães Filho, Angelo Maiolino, Marcela Baraúna Magno, Davi da Silva Barbirato, Eduardo Murad Villoria, Lucianne Cople Maia, Sandra Regina Torres, Maria Augusta Visconti","doi":"10.1007/s40336-023-00605-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>Review, qualify and synthesize the evidence that compared computed tomography (CT) images with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting multiple myeloma (MM) lesions in the skull, through a systematic review.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Searches were performed in six databases and the grey literature, up to August 2023, without restriction by date or publication language. Observational studies comparing CT images and MRI of the skull of patients previously diagnosed with MM were included. Data were extracted by two reviewers in a standardized and independent manner. The methodological quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool and the evidence certainty assessment using the GRADE tool.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Of the 911 identified references, 11 were included, and they all used either positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT) and/or low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) to compare to MRI. In 6 of 7 studies, MRI demonstrated a greater capacity to detect MM lesions than PET/CT images. When compared with LDCT images, MRI showed lower detection capacity in 4 studies. Six of the 11 included articles had a low risk of bias. However, as observational data evidence, the assessed certainty of the evidence was considered very low.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>PET/CT and MRI images presented limitations in detecting MM lesions in the skull compared to LDCT images. The evidence suggested that the greatest detection capability could be achieved by employing whole-body MRI complemented by LDCT images of the skull. Future studies are needed to confirm this result.</p>","PeriodicalId":48600,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Imaging","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-023-00605-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Review, qualify and synthesize the evidence that compared computed tomography (CT) images with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting multiple myeloma (MM) lesions in the skull, through a systematic review.

Methods

Searches were performed in six databases and the grey literature, up to August 2023, without restriction by date or publication language. Observational studies comparing CT images and MRI of the skull of patients previously diagnosed with MM were included. Data were extracted by two reviewers in a standardized and independent manner. The methodological quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool and the evidence certainty assessment using the GRADE tool.

Results

Of the 911 identified references, 11 were included, and they all used either positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT) and/or low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) to compare to MRI. In 6 of 7 studies, MRI demonstrated a greater capacity to detect MM lesions than PET/CT images. When compared with LDCT images, MRI showed lower detection capacity in 4 studies. Six of the 11 included articles had a low risk of bias. However, as observational data evidence, the assessed certainty of the evidence was considered very low.

Conclusions

PET/CT and MRI images presented limitations in detecting MM lesions in the skull compared to LDCT images. The evidence suggested that the greatest detection capability could be achieved by employing whole-body MRI complemented by LDCT images of the skull. Future studies are needed to confirm this result.

Abstract Image

计算机断层扫描与磁共振成像在检测颅内多发性骨髓瘤病变方面的比较:系统综述
目标通过一项系统性综述,对计算机断层扫描(CT)图像与磁共振成像(MRI)在检测头颅中多发性骨髓瘤(MM)病变方面的证据进行回顾、定性和综合。方法在截至 2023 年 8 月的六个数据库和灰色文献中进行搜索,不受日期或发表语言的限制。纳入的观察性研究对既往诊断为 MM 患者的头颅 CT 图像和 MRI 进行了比较。数据由两名审稿人以标准化和独立的方式提取。结果 在911篇已确定的参考文献中,有11篇被纳入,它们均使用正电子发射计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)和/或低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)与核磁共振成像进行比较。在 7 项研究中,有 6 项研究表明核磁共振成像检测 MM 病灶的能力高于 PET/CT 图像。与 LDCT 图像相比,4 项研究中 MRI 的检测能力较低。在纳入的 11 篇文章中,有 6 篇的偏倚风险较低。结论与LDCT图像相比,PET/CT和MRI图像在检测颅内MM病变方面存在局限性。有证据表明,采用全身核磁共振成像并辅以头颅的LDCT图像可实现最大的检测能力。未来的研究需要证实这一结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Imaging
Clinical and Translational Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Imaging is an international journal that publishes timely, up-to-date summaries on clinical practice and translational research and clinical applications of approved and experimental radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Coverage includes such topics as advanced preclinical evidence in the fields of physics, dosimetry, radiation biology and radiopharmacy with relevance to applications in human subjects. The journal benefits a readership of nuclear medicine practitioners and allied professionals involved in molecular imaging and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信