Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support

Kiminori Odagami, Tomohisa Nagata, Hisashi Eguchi, Kosuke Mafune, Akiomi Inoue, Koji Mori
{"title":"Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support","authors":"Kiminori Odagami, Tomohisa Nagata, Hisashi Eguchi, Kosuke Mafune, Akiomi Inoue, Koji Mori","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.15.23298552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to validate the Japanese version of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS-J) for the Japanese workforce by examining its reliability, factorial, construct, and test-retest validity.\nMethods: We conducted an online baseline survey with 6,220 employed Japanese individuals, followed by a follow-up survey two weeks later to examine the test-retest reliability of the SPOS-J. The SPOS-J was translated in accordance with the ISPOR Task Force Guidelines. Both confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were utilized to examine factorial validity. Construct validity was assessed using Pearson's correlation analysis, while internal consistency was determined through the calculation of Cronbach's alpha values. Additionally, test-retest reliability was evaluated with Cohen's weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients.\nResults: The SPOS-J demonstrated a better fit for a two-factor structure, comprising two subscales - SPOS-J (supported) and SPOS-J (unsupported) - compared to the one-factor structure of the original version. It exhibited high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients of .93 for the overall SPOS-J, .97 for the SPOS-J (supported), and .95 for the SPOS-J (unsupported). Test-retest reliability was found to be good for the overall SPOS-J (.62) and moderate for its subscales, with Cohen's weighted kappa values of .54 for SPOS-J (supported) and .42 for SPOS-J (unsupported). The construct validity was confirmed with significant correlations between the SPOS-J, its antecedents, and outcomes. Conclusions: The SPOS-J is a reliable and valid measure for assessing perceived organizational support among Japanese workers.","PeriodicalId":501555,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Occupational and Environmental Health","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Occupational and Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to validate the Japanese version of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS-J) for the Japanese workforce by examining its reliability, factorial, construct, and test-retest validity. Methods: We conducted an online baseline survey with 6,220 employed Japanese individuals, followed by a follow-up survey two weeks later to examine the test-retest reliability of the SPOS-J. The SPOS-J was translated in accordance with the ISPOR Task Force Guidelines. Both confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were utilized to examine factorial validity. Construct validity was assessed using Pearson's correlation analysis, while internal consistency was determined through the calculation of Cronbach's alpha values. Additionally, test-retest reliability was evaluated with Cohen's weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: The SPOS-J demonstrated a better fit for a two-factor structure, comprising two subscales - SPOS-J (supported) and SPOS-J (unsupported) - compared to the one-factor structure of the original version. It exhibited high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients of .93 for the overall SPOS-J, .97 for the SPOS-J (supported), and .95 for the SPOS-J (unsupported). Test-retest reliability was found to be good for the overall SPOS-J (.62) and moderate for its subscales, with Cohen's weighted kappa values of .54 for SPOS-J (supported) and .42 for SPOS-J (unsupported). The construct validity was confirmed with significant correlations between the SPOS-J, its antecedents, and outcomes. Conclusions: The SPOS-J is a reliable and valid measure for assessing perceived organizational support among Japanese workers.
日文版组织支持感调查的信度与效度
目的:本研究旨在通过检验日本员工组织支持感调查(SPOS-J)的信度、析因、结构和重测效度来验证日本员工的组织支持感调查(SPOS-J)。方法:我们对6220名日本雇员进行了在线基线调查,并在两周后进行了随访调查,以检验SPOS-J的重测信度。SPOS-J是根据ISPOR工作队指南进行翻译的。验证性和探索性因子分析均用于检验因子效度。采用Pearson相关分析评估结构效度,通过计算Cronbach’s alpha值确定内部一致性。此外,用Cohen加权kappa和类内相关系数评估重测信度。结果:与原始版本的单因素结构相比,SPOS-J表现出更好的适合双因素结构,包括两个子量表- SPOS-J(支持)和SPOS-J(不支持)。它表现出高度的内部一致性,整体SPOS-J的Cronbach's alpha系数为0.93,SPOS-J(支持)为0.97,SPOS-J(不支持)为0.95。测试-重测信度发现整体SPOS-J为良好(0.62),其子量表为中等,SPOS-J(支持)的Cohen加权kappa值为0.54,SPOS-J(不支持)的权重kappa值为0.42。构念效度在SPOS-J、其前因和结果之间存在显著的相关性。结论:SPOS-J量表是一种可靠有效的评估日本员工组织支持感的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信