Brick kiln pollution and its impact on health: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Laura Nicolaou, Fiona Sylvies, Isabel Veloso, Katherine Lord, Ram K Chandyo, Arun K Sharma, Laxman P Shrestha, David Parker, Steven M Thygerson, Darryn Waugh, Peter F DeCarlo, Gurumurthy Ramachandran, William Checkley
{"title":"Brick kiln pollution and its impact on health: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Laura Nicolaou, Fiona Sylvies, Isabel Veloso, Katherine Lord, Ram K Chandyo, Arun K Sharma, Laxman P Shrestha, David Parker, Steven M Thygerson, Darryn Waugh, Peter F DeCarlo, Gurumurthy Ramachandran, William Checkley","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.16.23298642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Brick kiln emissions contribute to ambient air pollution and poor health in workers and individuals living near the brick kilns; however, data on the effects of brick kiln pollution on the environment and health are limited.\nMethods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize existing evidence on the adverse effects of brick kiln emissions. Sources were extracted from electronic databases and manually through citation searching. We included studies if they contributed data on brick kiln pollutant concentrations, emission factors or source contributions to ambient air pollution, health outcomes among brick kiln workers (BKWs) or community members living near brick kilns, or a comparison between BKWs and unexposed participants. We estimated pooled, sample-size-weighted means and standard deviations for personal exposures by job type and computed mean emission factors and pollutant concentrations by brick kiln design. We calculated mean differences in lung function between BKWs and controls and risk differences of respiratory symptoms between BKWs and controls or for participants living near and far away from brick kilns using a fixed effects meta-analysis.\nResults: Our search yielded 1015 articles; 208 (20%) were assessed for eligibility and 101 (10%) were included in our review. We identified three studies through manual searching. Of 104 studies, 74 (71%) were conducted in South Asia. The most evaluated pollutants (whether kiln emissions, source contributions, or personal exposures) were particulate matter (PM; n=48), sulfur dioxide (SO2; n=24) and carbon monoxide (CO; n=22), and the most evaluated health outcomes were respiratory health (n=34) and musculoskeletal disorders (n=9). On average emissions of PM and CO were higher among traditional than improved brick kilns. Mean respirable silica exposures were only measured in 4 (4%) studies and were as high as 620 μg/m3, exceeding the NIOSH recommended exposure limit by a factor of over 12. BKWs had worse lung function, more respiratory symptoms, more musculoskeletal complaints, and more inflammation when compared to unexposed participants.\nConclusion: On average, BKWs had worse health outcomes when compared to unexposed controls but study quality supporting the evidence was low. Few studies reported silica concentrations or personal exposures, but the few that did suggest that exposures are high. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship between brick kiln pollution and health among workers, and to evaluate exposure mitigation strategies.","PeriodicalId":501555,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Occupational and Environmental Health","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Occupational and Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.16.23298642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Brick kiln emissions contribute to ambient air pollution and poor health in workers and individuals living near the brick kilns; however, data on the effects of brick kiln pollution on the environment and health are limited. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize existing evidence on the adverse effects of brick kiln emissions. Sources were extracted from electronic databases and manually through citation searching. We included studies if they contributed data on brick kiln pollutant concentrations, emission factors or source contributions to ambient air pollution, health outcomes among brick kiln workers (BKWs) or community members living near brick kilns, or a comparison between BKWs and unexposed participants. We estimated pooled, sample-size-weighted means and standard deviations for personal exposures by job type and computed mean emission factors and pollutant concentrations by brick kiln design. We calculated mean differences in lung function between BKWs and controls and risk differences of respiratory symptoms between BKWs and controls or for participants living near and far away from brick kilns using a fixed effects meta-analysis. Results: Our search yielded 1015 articles; 208 (20%) were assessed for eligibility and 101 (10%) were included in our review. We identified three studies through manual searching. Of 104 studies, 74 (71%) were conducted in South Asia. The most evaluated pollutants (whether kiln emissions, source contributions, or personal exposures) were particulate matter (PM; n=48), sulfur dioxide (SO2; n=24) and carbon monoxide (CO; n=22), and the most evaluated health outcomes were respiratory health (n=34) and musculoskeletal disorders (n=9). On average emissions of PM and CO were higher among traditional than improved brick kilns. Mean respirable silica exposures were only measured in 4 (4%) studies and were as high as 620 μg/m3, exceeding the NIOSH recommended exposure limit by a factor of over 12. BKWs had worse lung function, more respiratory symptoms, more musculoskeletal complaints, and more inflammation when compared to unexposed participants. Conclusion: On average, BKWs had worse health outcomes when compared to unexposed controls but study quality supporting the evidence was low. Few studies reported silica concentrations or personal exposures, but the few that did suggest that exposures are high. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship between brick kiln pollution and health among workers, and to evaluate exposure mitigation strategies.
砖窑污染及其对健康的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:砖窑排放造成环境空气污染,使砖窑附近的工人和个人健康状况不佳;然而,砖窑污染对环境和健康影响的数据有限。方法:我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,总结了砖窑排放不利影响的现有证据。文献从电子数据库中提取,并通过引文检索进行人工检索。如果研究提供了砖窑污染物浓度、排放因子或环境空气污染来源、砖窑工人(BKWs)或居住在砖窑附近的社区成员的健康结果,或砖窑工人与未接触砖窑的参与者之间的比较数据,我们将其纳入研究。我们根据工作类型估计了个人暴露的汇总、样本加权平均值和标准差,并根据砖窑设计计算了平均排放因子和污染物浓度。我们使用固定效应荟萃分析计算了BKWs和对照组之间肺功能的平均差异,以及BKWs和对照组之间或居住在砖窑附近和远离砖窑的参与者之间呼吸系统症状的风险差异。结果:我们检索了1015篇文章;208例(20%)被评估为合格,101例(10%)被纳入我们的综述。我们通过人工检索确定了三项研究。在104项研究中,74项(71%)在南亚进行。评估最多的污染物(无论是窑炉排放、源贡献还是个人暴露)是颗粒物(PM;n=48),二氧化硫(SO2;n=24)和一氧化碳(CO;N =22),评估最多的健康结果是呼吸健康(N =34)和肌肉骨骼疾病(N =9)。传统砖窑的PM和CO平均排放量高于改进砖窑。平均可吸入二氧化硅暴露量仅在4项(4%)研究中测量,高达620 μg/m3,超过NIOSH建议的暴露限值12倍以上。与未暴露的参与者相比,BKWs有更差的肺功能,更多的呼吸系统症状,更多的肌肉骨骼疾病和更多的炎症。结论:平均而言,与未暴露的对照组相比,BKWs的健康结果更差,但支持该证据的研究质量较低。很少有研究报告二氧化硅浓度或个人暴露,但也有少数研究表明暴露量很高。需要进一步研究以更好地了解砖窑污染与工人健康之间的关系,并评估暴露缓解策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信