Heckerthoughts

David Heckerman
{"title":"Heckerthoughts","authors":"David Heckerman","doi":"arxiv-2302.05449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1987, Eric Horvitz, Greg Cooper, and I visited I.J. Good at his\nuniversity. We wanted to see him was not because he worked with Alan Turing to\nhelp win WWII by decoding encrypted messages from the Germans, although that\ncertainly intrigued us. Rather, we wanted to see him because we had just\nfinished reading his book \"Good Thinking,\" which summarized his life's work in\nProbability and its Applications. We were graduate students at Stanford working\nin AI, and amazed that his thinking was so similar to ours, having worked\ndecades before us and coming from such a seemingly different perspective not\ninvolving AI. This story is a fitting introduction this manuscript. Now having\nyears to look back on my work, to boil it down to its essence, and to better\nappreciate its significance (if any) in the evolution of AI and ML, I realized\nit was time to put my work in perspective, providing a roadmap to any who would\nlike to explore it. After I had this realization, it occurred to me that this\nis what I.J. Good did in his book. This manuscript is for those who want to\nunderstand basic concepts central to ML and AI and to learn about early\napplications of these concepts. Ironically, after I finished writing this\nmanuscript, I realized that a lot of the concepts that I included are missing\nin modern courses on ML. I hope this work will help to make up for these\nomissions. The presentation gets somewhat technical in parts, but I've tried to\nkeep the math to the bare minimum. In addition to the technical presentations,\nI include stories about how the ideas came to be and the effects they have had.\nWhen I was a student in physics, I was given dry texts to read. In class,\nhowever, several of my physics professors would tell stories around the work.\nThose stories fascinated me and really made the theory stick. So here, I do my\nbest to present both the ideas and the stories behind them.","PeriodicalId":501533,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - General Literature","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - General Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2302.05449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1987, Eric Horvitz, Greg Cooper, and I visited I.J. Good at his university. We wanted to see him was not because he worked with Alan Turing to help win WWII by decoding encrypted messages from the Germans, although that certainly intrigued us. Rather, we wanted to see him because we had just finished reading his book "Good Thinking," which summarized his life's work in Probability and its Applications. We were graduate students at Stanford working in AI, and amazed that his thinking was so similar to ours, having worked decades before us and coming from such a seemingly different perspective not involving AI. This story is a fitting introduction this manuscript. Now having years to look back on my work, to boil it down to its essence, and to better appreciate its significance (if any) in the evolution of AI and ML, I realized it was time to put my work in perspective, providing a roadmap to any who would like to explore it. After I had this realization, it occurred to me that this is what I.J. Good did in his book. This manuscript is for those who want to understand basic concepts central to ML and AI and to learn about early applications of these concepts. Ironically, after I finished writing this manuscript, I realized that a lot of the concepts that I included are missing in modern courses on ML. I hope this work will help to make up for these omissions. The presentation gets somewhat technical in parts, but I've tried to keep the math to the bare minimum. In addition to the technical presentations, I include stories about how the ideas came to be and the effects they have had. When I was a student in physics, I was given dry texts to read. In class, however, several of my physics professors would tell stories around the work. Those stories fascinated me and really made the theory stick. So here, I do my best to present both the ideas and the stories behind them.
1987年,埃里克·霍维茨、格雷格·库珀和我拜访了古德所在的大学。我们之所以想见他,并不是因为他曾与艾伦·图灵(Alan Turing)合作,通过破译德国人的加密信息,帮助赢得了二战,尽管这确实引起了我们的兴趣。相反,我们之所以想见他,是因为我们刚刚读完他的书《好思考》(Good Thinking),书中总结了他一生在概率及其应用方面的工作。我们是斯坦福大学的研究生,在人工智能领域工作,我们惊讶于他的想法与我们如此相似,比我们早几十年,从一个看似不同的角度出发,而不涉及人工智能。这个故事是这部手稿的恰当介绍。现在有几年时间回顾我的工作,将其归结为其本质,并更好地理解其在AI和ML发展中的意义(如果有的话),我意识到是时候把我的工作放在正确的角度上,为任何想要探索它的人提供路线图。在我意识到这一点之后,我想到这就是I.J. Good在他的书中所做的。这份手稿是为那些想要理解机器学习和人工智能的基本概念,并了解这些概念的早期应用的人准备的。具有讽刺意味的是,在我写完这篇手稿后,我意识到我所包含的许多概念在现代ML课程中是缺失的。我希望这项工作将有助于弥补这些缺失。这个演示在某些方面有些技术性,但我尽量把数学保持在最低限度。除了技术演示之外,我还包括了关于这些想法是如何产生的以及它们产生的影响的故事。当我还是物理专业的学生时,老师给我的是枯燥无味的课文。然而,在课堂上,我的几位物理教授会讲一些关于这项工作的故事。那些故事让我着迷,也让我的理论更加站得住脚。所以在这里,我尽我最大的努力来呈现这些想法和背后的故事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信