Towards a Standardised Performance Evaluation Protocol for Cooperative MARL

Rihab Gorsane, Omayma Mahjoub, Ruan de Kock, Roland Dubb, Siddarth Singh, Arnu Pretorius
{"title":"Towards a Standardised Performance Evaluation Protocol for Cooperative MARL","authors":"Rihab Gorsane, Omayma Mahjoub, Ruan de Kock, Roland Dubb, Siddarth Singh, Arnu Pretorius","doi":"arxiv-2209.10485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has emerged as a useful approach to\nsolving decentralised decision-making problems at scale. Research in the field\nhas been growing steadily with many breakthrough algorithms proposed in recent\nyears. In this work, we take a closer look at this rapid development with a\nfocus on evaluation methodologies employed across a large body of research in\ncooperative MARL. By conducting a detailed meta-analysis of prior work,\nspanning 75 papers accepted for publication from 2016 to 2022, we bring to\nlight worrying trends that put into question the true rate of progress. We\nfurther consider these trends in a wider context and take inspiration from\nsingle-agent RL literature on similar issues with recommendations that remain\napplicable to MARL. Combining these recommendations, with novel insights from\nour analysis, we propose a standardised performance evaluation protocol for\ncooperative MARL. We argue that such a standard protocol, if widely adopted,\nwould greatly improve the validity and credibility of future research, make\nreplication and reproducibility easier, as well as improve the ability of the\nfield to accurately gauge the rate of progress over time by being able to make\nsound comparisons across different works. Finally, we release our meta-analysis\ndata publicly on our project website for future research on evaluation:\nhttps://sites.google.com/view/marl-standard-protocol","PeriodicalId":501533,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - General Literature","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - General Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2209.10485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has emerged as a useful approach to solving decentralised decision-making problems at scale. Research in the field has been growing steadily with many breakthrough algorithms proposed in recent years. In this work, we take a closer look at this rapid development with a focus on evaluation methodologies employed across a large body of research in cooperative MARL. By conducting a detailed meta-analysis of prior work, spanning 75 papers accepted for publication from 2016 to 2022, we bring to light worrying trends that put into question the true rate of progress. We further consider these trends in a wider context and take inspiration from single-agent RL literature on similar issues with recommendations that remain applicable to MARL. Combining these recommendations, with novel insights from our analysis, we propose a standardised performance evaluation protocol for cooperative MARL. We argue that such a standard protocol, if widely adopted, would greatly improve the validity and credibility of future research, make replication and reproducibility easier, as well as improve the ability of the field to accurately gauge the rate of progress over time by being able to make sound comparisons across different works. Finally, we release our meta-analysis data publicly on our project website for future research on evaluation: https://sites.google.com/view/marl-standard-protocol
合作MARL的标准化绩效评估协议研究
多智能体强化学习(MARL)已经成为解决大规模分散决策问题的一种有用方法。近年来,该领域的研究稳步发展,提出了许多突破性的算法。在这项工作中,我们仔细研究了这种快速发展,重点是在合作MARL的大量研究中采用的评估方法。通过对之前的工作进行详细的荟萃分析,涵盖2016年至2022年发表的75篇论文,我们揭示了令人担忧的趋势,这些趋势让人质疑真正的进展速度。我们进一步在更广泛的背景下考虑这些趋势,并从关于类似问题的单智能体强化学习文献中获得灵感,并提出仍然适用于MARL的建议。结合这些建议和我们分析的新见解,我们提出了一个标准化的合作MARL绩效评估协议。我们认为,这样的标准协议,如果被广泛采用,将大大提高未来研究的有效性和可信度,使重复性和可重复性更容易,并提高该领域的能力,以准确地衡量随着时间的推移,通过能够在不同的工作之间做出合理的比较进展速度。最后,我们在我们的项目网站上公开发布了我们的元分析数据,以供未来的评估研究:https://sites.google.com/view/marl-standard-protocol
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信