Large-scale morphological changes and sediment budget of the Western Scheldt estuary 1955–2020: the impact of large-scale sediment management

Edwin P. L. Elias, Ad J. F. Van der Spek, Zheng Bing Wang, Jelmer Cleveringa, Claire J. L. Jeuken, Marcel Taal, Jebbe J. Van der Werf
{"title":"Large-scale morphological changes and sediment budget of the Western Scheldt estuary 1955–2020: the impact of large-scale sediment management","authors":"Edwin P. L. Elias, Ad J. F. Van der Spek, Zheng Bing Wang, Jelmer Cleveringa, Claire J. L. Jeuken, Marcel Taal, Jebbe J. Van der Werf","doi":"10.1017/njg.2023.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Western Scheldt estuary, like in many estuaries, safe navigation, flood protection, and ecological targets require a balanced and sustainable sediment management. A thorough understanding of the morphodynamic functioning of the estuary and its response to changes in hydrodynamics (natural sediment transport) and large-scale interventions is imperative. This paper presents a detailed overview of over 65 years of morphological changes and a comprehensive sediment budget of the Western Scheldt estuary that is based on analysis of a unique series of frequent bathymetric surveys and historical data on human–sediment interactions of dredging, dredge disposal and sand mining. Solving the sediment budget reveals an annual sediment import of 2.2 million m<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>. The highest sediment imports occurred between 1980–1994 and 2005–2020 (2.9 and 3.7 million m<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>/year). A 1.3 million m<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>/year net export prevailed between 1994 and 2005. Natural variations in the hydrodynamics (e.g., tidal asymmetry and amplification) and sediment transports cannot explain the derived temporal variations in sediment import rates. Anthropogenic activities play a dominant role. Capital dredging of the main navigation channel has led to channel deepening and significantly increased dredge and disposal volumes. Disposal on tidal flats and in the secondary channel leads to a long-term storage of sand and, consequently, a local increase in bed level and a sand deficit in the remainder of the system that results in increased sediment imports. Large-scale disposal in the western part of the estuary can (temporarily) reverse the sediment exchange between the estuary and its mouth area, as observed between 1994 and 2005. Apparently, large-scale anthropogenic reallocation of sediment by dredging and/or disposal as part of navigation channel improvement, sand mining or nourishment essentially influences the morphological development of the Western Scheldt estuary. This reveals responsibilities as well as opportunities of sediment management for the Western Scheldt and similar estuaries worldwide.","PeriodicalId":501577,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Journal of Geosciences","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netherlands Journal of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2023.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Western Scheldt estuary, like in many estuaries, safe navigation, flood protection, and ecological targets require a balanced and sustainable sediment management. A thorough understanding of the morphodynamic functioning of the estuary and its response to changes in hydrodynamics (natural sediment transport) and large-scale interventions is imperative. This paper presents a detailed overview of over 65 years of morphological changes and a comprehensive sediment budget of the Western Scheldt estuary that is based on analysis of a unique series of frequent bathymetric surveys and historical data on human–sediment interactions of dredging, dredge disposal and sand mining. Solving the sediment budget reveals an annual sediment import of 2.2 million m3. The highest sediment imports occurred between 1980–1994 and 2005–2020 (2.9 and 3.7 million m3/year). A 1.3 million m3/year net export prevailed between 1994 and 2005. Natural variations in the hydrodynamics (e.g., tidal asymmetry and amplification) and sediment transports cannot explain the derived temporal variations in sediment import rates. Anthropogenic activities play a dominant role. Capital dredging of the main navigation channel has led to channel deepening and significantly increased dredge and disposal volumes. Disposal on tidal flats and in the secondary channel leads to a long-term storage of sand and, consequently, a local increase in bed level and a sand deficit in the remainder of the system that results in increased sediment imports. Large-scale disposal in the western part of the estuary can (temporarily) reverse the sediment exchange between the estuary and its mouth area, as observed between 1994 and 2005. Apparently, large-scale anthropogenic reallocation of sediment by dredging and/or disposal as part of navigation channel improvement, sand mining or nourishment essentially influences the morphological development of the Western Scheldt estuary. This reveals responsibilities as well as opportunities of sediment management for the Western Scheldt and similar estuaries worldwide.
1955-2020年西沙尔德河河口大尺度形态变化与泥沙收支:大尺度泥沙管理的影响
在西斯海尔德河口,与许多河口一样,安全航行、防洪和生态目标需要平衡和可持续的沉积物管理。深入了解河口的形态动力学功能及其对水动力(自然泥沙输运)变化和大规模干预的响应是必要的。本文基于对一系列独特的频繁测深调查和疏浚、疏浚处置和采砂的人类-沉积物相互作用的历史数据的分析,详细概述了西斯凯尔特河口超过65年的形态变化和全面的沉积物平衡。通过对泥沙预算的求解,可知我国每年的泥沙进口量为220万立方米。1980-1994年和2005-2020年泥沙进口量最高(290万m3/年和370万m3/年)。1994年至2005年期间,净出口量为130万立方米/年。水动力的自然变化(例如潮汐不对称和放大)和泥沙输运不能解释由此得出的泥沙输入率的时间变化。人为活动起主导作用。主要航道的疏浚导致航道加深,疏浚和处理量显著增加。在潮滩和次级河道上的处置导致沙子长期储存,因此,局部河床水位增加,系统其余部分的沙子不足,导致沉积物进口增加。1994 - 2005年的观测结果表明,河口西部的大规模处置可以(暂时)逆转河口与河口区之间的泥沙交换。显然,人类通过疏浚和/或处置作为航道改善、采砂或营养的一部分对沉积物进行大规模的再分配,本质上影响了西舍尔德河口的形态发展。这揭示了西斯海尔德河和世界各地类似河口沉积物管理的责任和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信