Measuring the integrated reporting quality in Europe: balanced scorecard perspectives

IF 3.3 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Omar Hassan Ali Nada, Zsuzsanna Győri
{"title":"Measuring the integrated reporting quality in Europe: balanced scorecard perspectives","authors":"Omar Hassan Ali Nada, Zsuzsanna Győri","doi":"10.1108/jfra-03-2023-0134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the adoption and quality of integrated reports in the European Union (EU).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The sample consists of 147 listed firms from the 18 EU countries during 2013–2020. This study creates a disclosure index – based on the balanced scorecard (BSC) that reflects the information content of integrated reports. The content analysis method is used to measure the integrated reporting quality (IRQ).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings demonstrate that the IRQ increased across the study’s time frame, going from 49.3% in 2013 to 77% in 2020. Furthermore, financial disclosures still get the most attention in the integrated reporting (IR), followed by learning and growth perspective disclosures. In addition, businesses in the financial and industrial sectors rely more on integrated reports. However, the utility sector has the highest IRQ score. By country, Spain has the highest rate of IR adoption, followed by France. Other countries, such as Austria and Hungary, have only implemented IR by one company each.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This study adds to the IR literature a new approach to measure IRQ by linking BSC with the IR framework. Empirically, businesses of any size can use this method to assess the degree of balance between the revealed financial and nonfinancial information in their reports.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Empirically, this study helps IR practitioners in determining how widely IR is used in Europe and in updating the database on the IR website. It helps them update and improve the IR framework by identifying the elements that have the least transparency and quality, investigating the causes and enhancing them.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to examine the IRQ in EU countries by linking the BSC with IR elements. This is to split the elements into their own pillars, making it easier to track disclosure and evaluate the corporations’ interest in revealing these perspectives, on their own and collectively.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":15826,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-03-2023-0134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the adoption and quality of integrated reports in the European Union (EU).

Design/methodology/approach

The sample consists of 147 listed firms from the 18 EU countries during 2013–2020. This study creates a disclosure index – based on the balanced scorecard (BSC) that reflects the information content of integrated reports. The content analysis method is used to measure the integrated reporting quality (IRQ).

Findings

The findings demonstrate that the IRQ increased across the study’s time frame, going from 49.3% in 2013 to 77% in 2020. Furthermore, financial disclosures still get the most attention in the integrated reporting (IR), followed by learning and growth perspective disclosures. In addition, businesses in the financial and industrial sectors rely more on integrated reports. However, the utility sector has the highest IRQ score. By country, Spain has the highest rate of IR adoption, followed by France. Other countries, such as Austria and Hungary, have only implemented IR by one company each.

Research limitations/implications

This study adds to the IR literature a new approach to measure IRQ by linking BSC with the IR framework. Empirically, businesses of any size can use this method to assess the degree of balance between the revealed financial and nonfinancial information in their reports.

Practical implications

Empirically, this study helps IR practitioners in determining how widely IR is used in Europe and in updating the database on the IR website. It helps them update and improve the IR framework by identifying the elements that have the least transparency and quality, investigating the causes and enhancing them.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to examine the IRQ in EU countries by linking the BSC with IR elements. This is to split the elements into their own pillars, making it easier to track disclosure and evaluate the corporations’ interest in revealing these perspectives, on their own and collectively.

衡量欧洲综合报告质量:平衡计分卡视角
目的本研究的目的是评估欧盟(EU)综合报告的采用和质量。设计/方法/方法样本包括来自18个欧盟国家的147家上市公司。本研究以平衡计分卡(BSC)为基础,建立反映综合报告资讯内容的披露指标。采用内容分析法对综合报告质量(IRQ)进行测度。研究结果表明,IRQ在研究期间有所增加,从2013年的49.3%上升到2020年的77%。此外,在综合报告(IR)中,财务披露仍然是最受关注的,其次是学习和成长视角披露。此外,金融和工业部门的业务更依赖于综合报告。然而,公用事业部门的IRQ得分最高。按国家划分,西班牙的IR采用率最高,其次是法国。其他国家,如奥地利和匈牙利,各自只由一家公司实施了IR。研究局限/启示本研究通过将平衡记分卡与IR框架联系起来,为IR文献增加了一种新的测量IRQ的方法。从经验上看,任何规模的企业都可以使用这种方法来评估其报告中披露的财务信息和非财务信息之间的平衡程度。实践意义从经验上讲,本研究有助于IR从业者确定IR在欧洲的应用范围,并更新IR网站上的数据库。它通过确定透明度和质量最低的要素,调查原因并加强这些因素,帮助它们更新和改进IR框架。原创性/价值据作者所知,本研究首次通过将平衡计分卡与IR要素联系起来,对欧盟国家的IRQ进行了研究。这是为了将这些要素分成各自的支柱,以便更容易地跟踪披露情况,并评估公司单独或集体披露这些观点的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
16.00%
发文量
65
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信