Vermicompost-based amendment compensated for the reducing effect of water stress on growth and yield of quinoa by improving soil moisture characteristic

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
Ali Mohkami, Najme Yazdanpanah, Amir Hossein Saeidnejad
{"title":"Vermicompost-based amendment compensated for the reducing effect of water stress on growth and yield of quinoa by improving soil moisture characteristic","authors":"Ali Mohkami, Najme Yazdanpanah, Amir Hossein Saeidnejad","doi":"10.1007/s10333-023-00959-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Water scarcity has widely affected agricultural production and food security, particularly in arid regions. There is little information available on the concurrent effects of water stress and organic amendment application on the water holding capacity of soil as well as the growth and yield responses of quinoa as a drought-resistant plant. In addition, there are limited reports on the optimum levels of deficit irrigation as a promising strategy for enhancing the water use efficiency and production of quinoa plant. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the moisture holding capacity of soil as well as the morphological and physiological responses of quinoa to the interactive effects of drought and organic amendment under field conditions. Three levels of water stress (full-irrigation, moderate drought, and severe drought) and four treatments of organic amendment including control (without the use of organic matter), vermicompost (20 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), biochar (20 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), and the composition of vermicompost and biochar (at an equal rate of 10 t ha<sup>−1</sup> each) were applied as the subsidiary factor. Result indicated that severe drought reduced the plant yield significantly (21.7%) as compared to control, whereas moderate drought showed no significant effect. Drought increased the proline content, whereas reduced all other traits including crop growth rate, 1000-seeds weight, bush height, panicle length, leaf area index, chlorophyll, proline, carotenoids, protein, and relative water content. However, the application of biochar, vermicompost, and Bvrm relative to the control treatment increased WUE by 12.3, 36.8, and 45.6%, soil moisture content by 2.0, 20.1 and 28.9%, and the quinoa yield by 1.0, 21.9, and 28.6%, respectively. There was an inverse relationship between water use efficiency and the grain yield of quinoa. The simultaneous effect of drought and biofertilizer on the quinoa grain yield (<i>Y</i>) was demonstrated based on soil moisture content (<i>θ</i>) using a linear relationship (<i>Y</i> = 168.5(<i>θ</i>) − 4.74; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.994, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). The results also indicated that WUE was reduced linearly with increasing soil moisture content. Among different relationships, logarithmic function exhibited the best performance for predicting the yield of quinoa based on the amount of irrigation water. The findings of this study revealed the important role of soil moisture as a manageable characteristic in facing environmental stresses such as drought and achieving the sustainability of crop production.</p>","PeriodicalId":56101,"journal":{"name":"Paddy and Water Environment","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paddy and Water Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-023-00959-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water scarcity has widely affected agricultural production and food security, particularly in arid regions. There is little information available on the concurrent effects of water stress and organic amendment application on the water holding capacity of soil as well as the growth and yield responses of quinoa as a drought-resistant plant. In addition, there are limited reports on the optimum levels of deficit irrigation as a promising strategy for enhancing the water use efficiency and production of quinoa plant. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the moisture holding capacity of soil as well as the morphological and physiological responses of quinoa to the interactive effects of drought and organic amendment under field conditions. Three levels of water stress (full-irrigation, moderate drought, and severe drought) and four treatments of organic amendment including control (without the use of organic matter), vermicompost (20 t ha−1), biochar (20 t ha−1), and the composition of vermicompost and biochar (at an equal rate of 10 t ha−1 each) were applied as the subsidiary factor. Result indicated that severe drought reduced the plant yield significantly (21.7%) as compared to control, whereas moderate drought showed no significant effect. Drought increased the proline content, whereas reduced all other traits including crop growth rate, 1000-seeds weight, bush height, panicle length, leaf area index, chlorophyll, proline, carotenoids, protein, and relative water content. However, the application of biochar, vermicompost, and Bvrm relative to the control treatment increased WUE by 12.3, 36.8, and 45.6%, soil moisture content by 2.0, 20.1 and 28.9%, and the quinoa yield by 1.0, 21.9, and 28.6%, respectively. There was an inverse relationship between water use efficiency and the grain yield of quinoa. The simultaneous effect of drought and biofertilizer on the quinoa grain yield (Y) was demonstrated based on soil moisture content (θ) using a linear relationship (Y = 168.5(θ) − 4.74; R2 = 0.994, p < 0.01). The results also indicated that WUE was reduced linearly with increasing soil moisture content. Among different relationships, logarithmic function exhibited the best performance for predicting the yield of quinoa based on the amount of irrigation water. The findings of this study revealed the important role of soil moisture as a manageable characteristic in facing environmental stresses such as drought and achieving the sustainability of crop production.

Abstract Image

蚯蚓堆肥改良通过改善土壤水分特性来补偿水分胁迫对藜麦生长和产量的影响
水资源短缺已广泛影响到农业生产和粮食安全,特别是在干旱地区。关于水分胁迫和有机改剂剂同时施用对土壤持水能力的影响以及藜麦作为抗旱植物的生长和产量响应的资料很少。此外,关于亏缺灌溉作为提高藜麦植物水分利用效率和产量的一种有希望的策略的最佳水平的报道有限。因此,本研究旨在探讨在田间条件下,藜麦对干旱和有机改良交互作用的土壤持湿能力和形态生理反应。3个水分胁迫水平(充分灌溉、中度干旱和严重干旱)和4个有机改良处理,包括对照(不使用有机质)、蚯蚓堆肥(20 t ha−1)、生物炭(20 t ha−1),以及蚯蚓堆肥和生物炭的组成(各以10 t ha−1的等量施用)作为辅助因子。结果表明:与对照相比,重度干旱显著降低了植株产量(21.7%),中度干旱对植株产量无显著影响。干旱增加了脯氨酸含量,但降低了作物生长速度、千粒重、丛高、穗长、叶面积指数、叶绿素、脯氨酸、类胡萝卜素、蛋白质和相对含水量等其他性状。与对照处理相比,施用生物炭、蚯蚓堆肥和白藜芦醇可使水分利用效率分别提高12.3、36.8%和45.6%,土壤含水量分别提高2.0、20.1%和28.9%,藜麦产量分别提高1.0、21.9%和28.6%。藜麦水分利用效率与籽粒产量呈反比关系。干旱和生物肥料对藜麦籽粒产量(Y)的影响以土壤含水量(θ)为基础,呈线性关系(Y = 168.5(θ)−4.74;R2 = 0.994, p < 0.01)。水分利用效率随土壤含水量的增加呈线性降低趋势。在不同关系中,对数函数对灌溉水量预测藜麦产量的效果最好。这项研究的结果揭示了土壤湿度作为一个可管理的特征在面对干旱等环境压力和实现作物生产的可持续性方面的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Paddy and Water Environment
Paddy and Water Environment AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-AGRONOMY
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
36
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Paddy and Water Environment is to advance the science and technology of water and environment related disciplines in paddy-farming. The scope includes the paddy-farming related scientific and technological aspects in agricultural engineering such as irrigation and drainage, soil and water conservation, land and water resources management, irrigation facilities and disaster management, paddy multi-functionality, agricultural policy, regional planning, bioenvironmental systems, and ecological conservation and restoration in paddy farming regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信