On applying residual reasoning within neural network verification

IF 2 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Yizhak Yisrael Elboher, Elazar Cohen, Guy Katz
{"title":"On applying residual reasoning within neural network verification","authors":"Yizhak Yisrael Elboher, Elazar Cohen, Guy Katz","doi":"10.1007/s10270-023-01138-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As neural networks are increasingly being integrated into mission-critical systems, it is becoming crucial to ensure that they meet various safety and liveness requirements. Toward, that end, numerous complete and sound verification techniques have been proposed in recent years, but these often suffer from severe scalability issues. One recently proposed approach for improving the scalability of verification techniques is to enhance them with abstraction/refinement capabilities: instead of verifying a complex and large network, abstraction allows the verifier to construct and then verify a much smaller network, and the correctness of the smaller network immediately implies the correctness of the original, larger network. One shortcoming of this scheme is that whenever the smaller network cannot be verified, the verifier must perform a refinement step, in which the size of the network being verified is increased. The verifier then starts verifying the new network from scratch—effectively “forgetting” its earlier work, in which the smaller network was verified. Here, we present an enhancement to abstraction-based neural network verification, which uses <i>residual reasoning</i>: a process where information acquired when verifying an abstract network is utilized in order to facilitate the verification of refined networks. At its core, the method enables the verifier to retain information about parts of the search space in which it was determined that the refined network behaves correctly, allowing the verifier to focus on areas of the search space where bugs might yet be discovered. For evaluation, we implemented our approach as an extension to the Marabou verifier and obtained highly promising results.</p>","PeriodicalId":49507,"journal":{"name":"Software and Systems Modeling","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Software and Systems Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-023-01138-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As neural networks are increasingly being integrated into mission-critical systems, it is becoming crucial to ensure that they meet various safety and liveness requirements. Toward, that end, numerous complete and sound verification techniques have been proposed in recent years, but these often suffer from severe scalability issues. One recently proposed approach for improving the scalability of verification techniques is to enhance them with abstraction/refinement capabilities: instead of verifying a complex and large network, abstraction allows the verifier to construct and then verify a much smaller network, and the correctness of the smaller network immediately implies the correctness of the original, larger network. One shortcoming of this scheme is that whenever the smaller network cannot be verified, the verifier must perform a refinement step, in which the size of the network being verified is increased. The verifier then starts verifying the new network from scratch—effectively “forgetting” its earlier work, in which the smaller network was verified. Here, we present an enhancement to abstraction-based neural network verification, which uses residual reasoning: a process where information acquired when verifying an abstract network is utilized in order to facilitate the verification of refined networks. At its core, the method enables the verifier to retain information about parts of the search space in which it was determined that the refined network behaves correctly, allowing the verifier to focus on areas of the search space where bugs might yet be discovered. For evaluation, we implemented our approach as an extension to the Marabou verifier and obtained highly promising results.

Abstract Image

残差推理在神经网络验证中的应用
随着神经网络越来越多地集成到关键任务系统中,确保它们满足各种安全性和活动性要求变得至关重要。为了实现这一目标,近年来提出了许多完整而可靠的验证技术,但这些技术往往存在严重的可伸缩性问题。最近提出的一种提高验证技术可扩展性的方法是通过抽象/细化能力来增强它们:抽象允许验证者构建并验证一个小得多的网络,而不是验证一个复杂的大型网络,而小网络的正确性立即意味着原始的大型网络的正确性。该方案的一个缺点是,当较小的网络无法被验证时,验证者必须执行一个细化步骤,在这个步骤中,被验证的网络的规模会增加。然后,验证者开始从头开始验证新网络——实际上“忘记”了其早期的工作,即验证较小的网络。在这里,我们提出了对基于抽象的神经网络验证的增强,它使用残差推理:一个在验证抽象网络时获得的信息被利用以促进对精炼网络的验证的过程。在其核心,该方法使验证者能够保留有关搜索空间部分的信息,其中确定了改进的网络行为正确,允许验证者专注于可能发现错误的搜索空间区域。为了评估,我们将我们的方法作为Marabou验证器的扩展实现,并获得了非常有希望的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Software and Systems Modeling
Software and Systems Modeling 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: We invite authors to submit papers that discuss and analyze research challenges and experiences pertaining to software and system modeling languages, techniques, tools, practices and other facets. The following are some of the topic areas that are of special interest, but the journal publishes on a wide range of software and systems modeling concerns: Domain-specific models and modeling standards; Model-based testing techniques; Model-based simulation techniques; Formal syntax and semantics of modeling languages such as the UML; Rigorous model-based analysis; Model composition, refinement and transformation; Software Language Engineering; Modeling Languages in Science and Engineering; Language Adaptation and Composition; Metamodeling techniques; Measuring quality of models and languages; Ontological approaches to model engineering; Generating test and code artifacts from models; Model synthesis; Methodology; Model development tool environments; Modeling Cyberphysical Systems; Data intensive modeling; Derivation of explicit models from data; Case studies and experience reports with significant modeling lessons learned; Comparative analyses of modeling languages and techniques; Scientific assessment of modeling practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信