Seeing with fresh eyes – the potential of paradox theory to explore persistent, interdependent tensions in supply chains

IF 7.1 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Canan Kocabasoglu-Hillmer, Evelyne Vanpoucke, Byung-Gak Son, Sinéad Roden
{"title":"Seeing with fresh eyes – the potential of paradox theory to explore persistent, interdependent tensions in supply chains","authors":"Canan Kocabasoglu-Hillmer, Evelyne Vanpoucke, Byung-Gak Son, Sinéad Roden","doi":"10.1108/ijopm-07-2023-0605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study explores the potential of paradox theory as a novel theoretical lens to investigate persistent and interdependent tensions in supply chains. It is based on a critical literature review focusing on paradoxes observed within complex supply chains in dynamic business environments, including the articles selected for this special issue, “Environmental Dynamism and Supply Chain Complexity: Managing the Paradoxes.”</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study introduces the key concepts and themes of the paradox theory literature and possible methodological approaches to studying paradoxes in supply chains. Through a literature review, this study also reflects on the current state of paradox research in the field of operations and supply chain management (OSCM) and proposes future research questions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The application of paradox theory to OSCM research is in its early stages. This paper presents opportunities to explore persistent and interdependent tensions in supply chains using paradox theory.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The paper suggests several new research questions that should be translated into more precise propositions. The main implication for research is a call to focus attention on how and why a paradox perspective can help supply chain researchers view complex supply chain problems with fresh eyes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The study provides the first critical review of paradoxical tensions in OSCM research. While the papers in this special issue contribute significantly to a better understanding of these issues, there is still significant potential for understanding how to respond to paradoxes in supply chains.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":14234,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Operations & Production Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Operations & Production Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-07-2023-0605","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study explores the potential of paradox theory as a novel theoretical lens to investigate persistent and interdependent tensions in supply chains. It is based on a critical literature review focusing on paradoxes observed within complex supply chains in dynamic business environments, including the articles selected for this special issue, “Environmental Dynamism and Supply Chain Complexity: Managing the Paradoxes.”

Design/methodology/approach

This study introduces the key concepts and themes of the paradox theory literature and possible methodological approaches to studying paradoxes in supply chains. Through a literature review, this study also reflects on the current state of paradox research in the field of operations and supply chain management (OSCM) and proposes future research questions.

Findings

The application of paradox theory to OSCM research is in its early stages. This paper presents opportunities to explore persistent and interdependent tensions in supply chains using paradox theory.

Research limitations/implications

The paper suggests several new research questions that should be translated into more precise propositions. The main implication for research is a call to focus attention on how and why a paradox perspective can help supply chain researchers view complex supply chain problems with fresh eyes.

Originality/value

The study provides the first critical review of paradoxical tensions in OSCM research. While the papers in this special issue contribute significantly to a better understanding of these issues, there is still significant potential for understanding how to respond to paradoxes in supply chains.

用新鲜的眼光看问题——悖论理论在探索供应链中持续的、相互依赖的紧张关系方面的潜力
目的:本研究探索悖论理论作为研究供应链中持续和相互依赖的紧张关系的新理论视角的潜力。它基于对动态商业环境中复杂供应链中观察到的悖论的重要文献综述,包括为本期特刊“环境动态性和供应链复杂性:管理悖论”选择的文章。设计/方法论/方法本研究介绍了悖论理论文献的关键概念和主题,以及研究供应链悖论的可能方法。通过文献综述,本研究也反思了运营与供应链管理(OSCM)领域的悖论研究现状,并提出了未来的研究问题。结果悖论理论在OSCM研究中的应用尚处于起步阶段。本文提供了利用悖论理论探索供应链中持续和相互依赖的紧张关系的机会。研究的局限性/意义本文提出了几个新的研究问题,这些问题应该转化为更精确的命题。研究的主要含义是呼吁关注悖论视角如何以及为什么可以帮助供应链研究人员以新的眼光看待复杂的供应链问题。原创性/价值本研究首次批判性地回顾了OSCM研究中的矛盾张力。虽然本期特刊中的论文对更好地理解这些问题做出了重大贡献,但在理解如何应对供应链中的悖论方面仍有很大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
17.20%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: The mission of the International Journal of Operations & Production Management (IJOPM) is to publish cutting-edge, innovative research with the potential to significantly advance the field of Operations and Supply Chain Management, both in theory and practice. Drawing on experiences from manufacturing and service sectors, in both private and public contexts, the journal has earned widespread respect in this complex and increasingly vital area of business management. Methodologically, IJOPM encompasses a broad spectrum of empirically-based inquiry using suitable research frameworks, as long as they offer generic insights of substantial value to operations and supply chain management. While the journal does not categorically exclude specific empirical methodologies, it does not accept purely mathematical modeling pieces. Regardless of the chosen mode of inquiry or methods employed, the key criteria are appropriateness of methodology, clarity in the study's execution, and rigor in the application of methods. It's important to note that any contribution should explicitly contribute to theory. The journal actively encourages the use of mixed methods where appropriate and valuable for generating research insights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信