Testing the Effects of a Utility Value Intervention in an Online Research Methods Course: A Conceptual Replication of Hulleman et al. (2017, Study 2)

Pub Date : 2022-06-10 DOI:10.1177/00986283221101850
Paul C. Price, Kiana Crisosto, Anthony Carvalho, Constance J. Jones, Meaghan McCready, Amber Shaver, Andrea N. Wiemann
{"title":"Testing the Effects of a Utility Value Intervention in an Online Research Methods Course: A Conceptual Replication of Hulleman et al. (2017, Study 2)","authors":"Paul C. Price, Kiana Crisosto, Anthony Carvalho, Constance J. Jones, Meaghan McCready, Amber Shaver, Andrea N. Wiemann","doi":"10.1177/00986283221101850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Background</h2><p>Utility-value (UV) classroom interventions typically involve students completing assignments that involve writing about the usefulness of the course material. They are widely recommended and have received some empirical support.</p><h2>Objective</h2><p>This study tested the effectiveness of a UV intervention in an online research methods course. It was a conceptual replication of a study by Hulleman et al. (2017, Study 2).</p><h2>Method</h2><p>Students (<i>N</i> = 264) were randomly assigned to complete three assignments that required them to write about the usefulness of course material or three assignments that required them to summarize course material. The groups were compared in terms of their scores on a research methods knowledge test, their final papers, their final exams, and their final point totals, along with measures of the interestingness and usefulness of the course material.</p><h2>Results</h2><p>There were no differences between conditions on any of the outcome variables.</p><h2>Conclusion</h2><p>The UV intervention was ineffective. Further research is needed to establish the conditions under which such interventions are and are not effective.</p><h2>Teaching Implications</h2><p>UV interventions do not necessarily improve student performance. Instructors who use them should consider doing so in a way that allows for an assessment of their effect in their local context.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283221101850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Utility-value (UV) classroom interventions typically involve students completing assignments that involve writing about the usefulness of the course material. They are widely recommended and have received some empirical support.

Objective

This study tested the effectiveness of a UV intervention in an online research methods course. It was a conceptual replication of a study by Hulleman et al. (2017, Study 2).

Method

Students (N = 264) were randomly assigned to complete three assignments that required them to write about the usefulness of course material or three assignments that required them to summarize course material. The groups were compared in terms of their scores on a research methods knowledge test, their final papers, their final exams, and their final point totals, along with measures of the interestingness and usefulness of the course material.

Results

There were no differences between conditions on any of the outcome variables.

Conclusion

The UV intervention was ineffective. Further research is needed to establish the conditions under which such interventions are and are not effective.

Teaching Implications

UV interventions do not necessarily improve student performance. Instructors who use them should consider doing so in a way that allows for an assessment of their effect in their local context.

分享
查看原文
在线研究方法课程中效用价值干预的效果检验:Hulleman et al.(2017,研究2)的概念复制
实用价值(UV)课堂干预通常涉及学生完成涉及撰写课程材料有用性的作业。它们被广泛推荐,并得到了一些实证支持。目的探讨紫外线干预在线研究方法课程的有效性。这是对Hulleman等人(2017,study 2)研究的概念复制。方法随机分配学生(N = 264)完成三项作业,要求他们撰写课程材料的有用性,或三项作业要求他们总结课程材料。研究人员比较了两组学生在研究方法知识测试、期末论文、期末考试和期末总分数方面的得分,并衡量了课程材料的趣味性和实用性。结果两组在各结果变量上均无差异。结论紫外线干预无效。需要进一步的研究来确定这些干预措施有效和无效的条件。教学意义suv干预不一定能提高学生的表现。使用这些工具的教师应该考虑在使用这些工具时,对其在当地环境中的效果进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信