Efficacy of Mobocertinib and Amivantamab in Patients With Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Exon 20 Insertions Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: An Indirect Treatment Comparison

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou , Thibaud Prawitz , Huamao M. Lin , Jin-liern Hong , Min Tan , Irina Proskorovsky , Luis Hernandez , Shu Jin , Pingkuan Zhang , Jianchang Lin , Jyoti Patel , Danny Nguyen , Joel W. Neal
{"title":"Efficacy of Mobocertinib and Amivantamab in Patients With Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Exon 20 Insertions Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: An Indirect Treatment Comparison","authors":"Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou ,&nbsp;Thibaud Prawitz ,&nbsp;Huamao M. Lin ,&nbsp;Jin-liern Hong ,&nbsp;Min Tan ,&nbsp;Irina Proskorovsky ,&nbsp;Luis Hernandez ,&nbsp;Shu Jin ,&nbsp;Pingkuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Jianchang Lin ,&nbsp;Jyoti Patel ,&nbsp;Danny Nguyen ,&nbsp;Joel W. Neal","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2023.11.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) mutations of the <em>EGFR</em><span><span><span> gene account for 1% to 2% of all non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Targeted therapies have been developed to treat this </span>cancer type but have not been studied in head-to-head trials. Our objective was to use a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to assess the efficacy of mobocertinib and amivantamab </span>in patients with NSCLC </span><em>EGFR</em> ex20ins mutations who were previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>An unanchored MAIC was conducted to estimate the treatment effects of mobocertinib and amivantamab using individual-level data from the mobocertinib phase I/II single-arm trial (NCT02716116) and published data from the amivantamab single-arm CHRYSALIS trial (NCT02609776). Confirmed overall response rate (cORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DoR) were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both trials were comparable in terms of study population, study design, and outcome definitions and included 114 patients who received mobocertinib and 114 patients who received amivantamab. After MAIC weighting, all reported baseline characteristics were balanced between mobocertinib and amivantamab. The weighted odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] comparing mobocertinib to amivantamab was 0.56 (0.30-1.04) for independent review committee (IRC)-assessed cORR and 0.98 (0.53-1.82) for investigator (INV)-assessed cORR. The weighted hazard ratio (HR) comparing mobocertinib to amivantamab was 0.74 (0.51-1.07) for IRC-assessed PFS, 0.92 (0.57-1.48) for OS, and 0.59 (0.30-1.18) for INV-assessed DoR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>MAIC analysis showed that mobocertinib and amivantamab had similar efficacy in patients with NSCLC harboring <em>EGFR</em> ex20ins mutations whose disease progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. These findings may benefit patients by supporting future treatment options.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730423002541","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) mutations of the EGFR gene account for 1% to 2% of all non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Targeted therapies have been developed to treat this cancer type but have not been studied in head-to-head trials. Our objective was to use a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to assess the efficacy of mobocertinib and amivantamab in patients with NSCLC EGFR ex20ins mutations who were previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

An unanchored MAIC was conducted to estimate the treatment effects of mobocertinib and amivantamab using individual-level data from the mobocertinib phase I/II single-arm trial (NCT02716116) and published data from the amivantamab single-arm CHRYSALIS trial (NCT02609776). Confirmed overall response rate (cORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DoR) were assessed.

Results

Both trials were comparable in terms of study population, study design, and outcome definitions and included 114 patients who received mobocertinib and 114 patients who received amivantamab. After MAIC weighting, all reported baseline characteristics were balanced between mobocertinib and amivantamab. The weighted odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] comparing mobocertinib to amivantamab was 0.56 (0.30-1.04) for independent review committee (IRC)-assessed cORR and 0.98 (0.53-1.82) for investigator (INV)-assessed cORR. The weighted hazard ratio (HR) comparing mobocertinib to amivantamab was 0.74 (0.51-1.07) for IRC-assessed PFS, 0.92 (0.57-1.48) for OS, and 0.59 (0.30-1.18) for INV-assessed DoR.

Conclusion

MAIC analysis showed that mobocertinib and amivantamab had similar efficacy in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations whose disease progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. These findings may benefit patients by supporting future treatment options.

Mobocertinib和Amivantamab在EGFR外显子20插入的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者先前接受铂基化疗的疗效:间接治疗比较
目的EGFR基因外显子20插入(ex20ins)突变占所有非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的1-2%。针对这种癌症类型的靶向疗法已经被开发出来,但尚未在头对头试验中进行研究。我们的目的是使用匹配调整间接比较(MAIC)来评估mobocertinib和amivantamab在NSCLC EGFR ex20ins突变患者中的疗效,这些患者之前接受过铂基化疗。材料和方法:采用mobocertinib I/II期单臂试验(NCT02716116)的个体数据和amivantamalis单臂试验(NCT02609776)的已发表数据,进行无锚定的MAIC评估mobocertinib和amivantamab的治疗效果。评估确诊的总缓解率(cORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和反应持续时间(DoR)。两项试验在研究人群、研究设计和结果定义方面具有可比性,包括114名接受莫博西替尼治疗的患者和114名接受阿米万他抗治疗的患者。在MAIC加权后,所有报告的基线特征在莫博西替尼和阿米万他单抗之间得到平衡。mobocertinib与amivantamab的加权优势比(OR)[95%可信区间(CI)]分别为0.56(0.30-1.04)和0.98(0.53-1.82)。mobocertinib与amivantamab的加权风险比(HR)分别为0.74(0.51-1.07)、0.92(0.57-1.48)和0.59(0.30-1.18)。结论smaic分析显示,莫博西替尼和阿米万他单抗对EGFR ex20ins突变的NSCLC患者在铂类化疗期间或之后病情进展的疗效相似。这些发现可能通过支持未来的治疗方案而使患者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical lung cancer
Clinical lung cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信