{"title":"Conceptualizing Trajectories of Readability","authors":"Michael Lucey","doi":"10.1353/ncf.2023.a911797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>In an essay on \"Phenomenological Aesthetics,\" the philosopher Roman Ingarden asserted that \"works of art have the right to expect to be properly apprehended by observers who are in communion with them and to have their special value justly treated\" (269). What does it mean to \"properly apprehend\" a novel? How do we know how to read something \"justly\"? What would it mean to claim that something has become \"unreadable\"? Can books somehow show us how they want to be read? Can lost forms of intelligibility and appreciation be recovered? How do we know whether the way we are reading a book is the way it asks to be read or is the product of our own, differently structured habitus? In this article, I ask these kinds of questions about novels by Sand, Gautier, and a few others with the help of Ingarden and Bourdieu as well as some recent critics.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":42524,"journal":{"name":"NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRENCH STUDIES","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRENCH STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ncf.2023.a911797","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:
In an essay on "Phenomenological Aesthetics," the philosopher Roman Ingarden asserted that "works of art have the right to expect to be properly apprehended by observers who are in communion with them and to have their special value justly treated" (269). What does it mean to "properly apprehend" a novel? How do we know how to read something "justly"? What would it mean to claim that something has become "unreadable"? Can books somehow show us how they want to be read? Can lost forms of intelligibility and appreciation be recovered? How do we know whether the way we are reading a book is the way it asks to be read or is the product of our own, differently structured habitus? In this article, I ask these kinds of questions about novels by Sand, Gautier, and a few others with the help of Ingarden and Bourdieu as well as some recent critics.
期刊介绍：
Nineteenth-Century French Studies provides scholars and students with the opportunity to examine new trends, review promising research findings, and become better acquainted with professional developments in the field. Scholarly articles on all aspects of nineteenth-century French literature and criticism are invited. Published articles are peer reviewed to ensure scholarly integrity. This journal has an extensive book review section covering a variety of disciplines. Nineteenth-Century French Studies is published twice a year in two double issues, fall/winter and spring/summer.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
