Everyday Poetics: Logic, Love, and Ethics by Brett Bourbon (review)

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
Katie Pelkey
{"title":"Everyday Poetics: Logic, Love, and Ethics by Brett Bourbon (review)","authors":"Katie Pelkey","doi":"10.1353/phl.2023.a913821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Everyday Poetics: Logic, Love, and Ethics</em> by Brett Bourbon <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Katie Pelkey </li> </ul> <em>Everyday Poetics: Logic, Love, and Ethics</em> by Brett Bourbon; 200 pp. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2022. <p>In <em>Everyday Poetics: Logic, Love, and Ethics</em>, Brett Bourbon probes the nature of poetry and its centrality in our everyday lives, working from the ordinary-language philosophical framework associated with Ludwig Wittgenstein, J. L. Austin, W. V. O. Quine, and Stanley Cavell. Bourbon's ideas contribute new dimensions to the elusive concept of poetry and pivots the reader's attention inward: how can we recognize poetry in our day-to-day and why should we? At sentence level, his claims are clear and compelling to readers across disciplines with varying knowledge of philosophy and poetry. This book is thus addressed to \"poets, literary scholars, philosophers, and students of religion, and anyone who cares about the ethics of everyday life, about the surprises that punctuate and give our lives form\" (p. ix).</p> <p>Poems themselves are such \"events of form,\" Bourbon emphasizes, which live among us and need not be constituted by words. Wordless poems can be uncovered and embraced through the development of a \"poetic vulnerability\" to ordinary experiences that are not necessarily wedded to one's aesthetic reaction. Bourbon designates the alphabet as one such example of what he calls a \"primal everyday poem\"; the alphabet is wordless and consists of a patterned order whose mere form does not encompass its meaning. The ordinary expression \"I love you\" also falls under this classification; the phrase is a performative poem whose intricate connotation is simplified by common language, yet is not the equivalent of its mere words. Bourbon asserts that, like the phrase \"I love you,\" poems of the everyday cannot be reduced to mere language, conditions, or creative modes.</p> <p>Of the ineffable nature of poetry, Bourbon claims, \"Poetry, like death, is that which we can only know by analogy—by examples—but it has a scope beyond all our examples\" (p. 108). In terms of examples, he draws from poignant personal experiences to reinforce his arguments and provide insight into his keen sensibility. In chapter 1 (\"Poems of the Everyday\"), Bourbon recounts his own dismissal as a young boy of poetry's worthiness until one day while watching an old film, he in fact was struck by the phrase \"I love you.\" This ordinary phrase allowed him to reconsider the parameters of what constitutes poetry and acknowledge the dichotomy of the phrase's formal power constituted by trivial symbols.</p> <p>Chapter 4 (\"Epithalamion\") is also rooted in personal experience. Bourbon opens with the flat assertion, \"I have never liked weddings\" (p. 43), but he notes a difference between a \"marriage of forms\" and \"marriage of intimacy and stability\": his distaste is for the former. He believes that a successful marriage can become a poem of the everyday—an event of power and \"linguistic surrogacy\"—where the event itself fosters more meaning than the words alone <strong>[End Page 475]</strong> can carry. Marriage can be a poem of discovery that arises from the action of learning what it means to love. But in the objects of the wedding and all its trite, heart-shaped symbols, Bourbon remarks, no poems are to be found.</p> <p>Bourbon dedicates chapter 5 (\"Is a Poem the Same as Its Words?\") to his claim that what a poem is cannot be bound by its words entirely or by meaning alone. If one finds each line of a poem intelligible, that does not indicate that the poem's meaning is consequentially understood. Conversely, a reader may not know a poem's meaning with complete certainty; what is said may not illuminate what is meant. In Bourbon's explanation of the sentence as a model for how particular words construct a poem, he says that one must determine how such a sentence-poem would be meaningful through our own reading. He claims that a poem is more than its words and cannot be simplified into sets of sentences or phrases. \"A poem, if it is a sentence, is always more than that sentence; otherwise, a poem would not be a poem but a sentence\" (p. 67).</p> <p>Bourbon's latest publication challenges traditional, long...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":51912,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.2023.a913821","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Everyday Poetics: Logic, Love, and Ethics by Brett Bourbon
  • Katie Pelkey
Everyday Poetics: Logic, Love, and Ethics by Brett Bourbon; 200 pp. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2022.

In Everyday Poetics: Logic, Love, and Ethics, Brett Bourbon probes the nature of poetry and its centrality in our everyday lives, working from the ordinary-language philosophical framework associated with Ludwig Wittgenstein, J. L. Austin, W. V. O. Quine, and Stanley Cavell. Bourbon's ideas contribute new dimensions to the elusive concept of poetry and pivots the reader's attention inward: how can we recognize poetry in our day-to-day and why should we? At sentence level, his claims are clear and compelling to readers across disciplines with varying knowledge of philosophy and poetry. This book is thus addressed to "poets, literary scholars, philosophers, and students of religion, and anyone who cares about the ethics of everyday life, about the surprises that punctuate and give our lives form" (p. ix).

Poems themselves are such "events of form," Bourbon emphasizes, which live among us and need not be constituted by words. Wordless poems can be uncovered and embraced through the development of a "poetic vulnerability" to ordinary experiences that are not necessarily wedded to one's aesthetic reaction. Bourbon designates the alphabet as one such example of what he calls a "primal everyday poem"; the alphabet is wordless and consists of a patterned order whose mere form does not encompass its meaning. The ordinary expression "I love you" also falls under this classification; the phrase is a performative poem whose intricate connotation is simplified by common language, yet is not the equivalent of its mere words. Bourbon asserts that, like the phrase "I love you," poems of the everyday cannot be reduced to mere language, conditions, or creative modes.

Of the ineffable nature of poetry, Bourbon claims, "Poetry, like death, is that which we can only know by analogy—by examples—but it has a scope beyond all our examples" (p. 108). In terms of examples, he draws from poignant personal experiences to reinforce his arguments and provide insight into his keen sensibility. In chapter 1 ("Poems of the Everyday"), Bourbon recounts his own dismissal as a young boy of poetry's worthiness until one day while watching an old film, he in fact was struck by the phrase "I love you." This ordinary phrase allowed him to reconsider the parameters of what constitutes poetry and acknowledge the dichotomy of the phrase's formal power constituted by trivial symbols.

Chapter 4 ("Epithalamion") is also rooted in personal experience. Bourbon opens with the flat assertion, "I have never liked weddings" (p. 43), but he notes a difference between a "marriage of forms" and "marriage of intimacy and stability": his distaste is for the former. He believes that a successful marriage can become a poem of the everyday—an event of power and "linguistic surrogacy"—where the event itself fosters more meaning than the words alone [End Page 475] can carry. Marriage can be a poem of discovery that arises from the action of learning what it means to love. But in the objects of the wedding and all its trite, heart-shaped symbols, Bourbon remarks, no poems are to be found.

Bourbon dedicates chapter 5 ("Is a Poem the Same as Its Words?") to his claim that what a poem is cannot be bound by its words entirely or by meaning alone. If one finds each line of a poem intelligible, that does not indicate that the poem's meaning is consequentially understood. Conversely, a reader may not know a poem's meaning with complete certainty; what is said may not illuminate what is meant. In Bourbon's explanation of the sentence as a model for how particular words construct a poem, he says that one must determine how such a sentence-poem would be meaningful through our own reading. He claims that a poem is more than its words and cannot be simplified into sets of sentences or phrases. "A poem, if it is a sentence, is always more than that sentence; otherwise, a poem would not be a poem but a sentence" (p. 67).

Bourbon's latest publication challenges traditional, long...

《日常诗学:逻辑、爱与伦理》作者:布雷特·波旁
代替摘要,这里是一个简短的内容摘录:书评:日常诗学:逻辑,爱,和伦理由布雷特波旁凯蒂佩基日常诗学:逻辑,爱,和伦理由布雷特波旁;200页。伦敦:布卢姆斯伯里出版社,2022。在《日常诗学:逻辑、爱与伦理》一书中,布雷特·波旁从与路德维希·维特根斯坦、j·l·奥斯汀、w·v·o·奎因和斯坦利·卡维尔有关的日常语言哲学框架出发,探讨了诗歌的本质及其在我们日常生活中的中心地位。波旁的思想为诗歌这个难以捉摸的概念提供了新的维度,并将读者的注意力向内转移:我们如何在日常生活中认识诗歌,为什么要认识诗歌?在句子层面上,他的主张清晰而引人注目,对不同学科的哲学和诗歌知识的读者来说都是如此。因此,这本书是写给“诗人、文学学者、哲学家、宗教学生,以及任何关心日常生活伦理的人,关心那些打断并赋予我们生活形式的惊喜的人”(第ix页)。波旁强调,诗歌本身就是这样的“形式事件”,它们生活在我们中间,不需要由文字构成。无言的诗歌可以通过对普通经历的“诗意脆弱性”的发展而被发现和接受,而这些经历不一定与一个人的审美反应相结合。波旁将字母表作为他所谓的“原始日常诗歌”的一个例子;字母表是无词的,由一种模式顺序组成,其纯粹的形式并不包含其意义。普通的表达“我爱你”也属于这一类;这个短语是一首表现性的诗,其复杂的内涵被普通语言简化了,但又不等同于它的纯粹的单词。波旁断言,就像“我爱你”这句话一样,日常的诗歌不能被简化为仅仅是语言、条件或创作模式。关于诗歌不可言喻的本质,波旁声称,“诗歌,就像死亡一样,我们只能通过类比——通过例子——来了解,但它的范围超出了我们所有的例子”(第108页)。在举例方面,他从痛苦的个人经历中吸取教训,以加强他的论点,并提供洞察他敏锐的感性。在第一章(“日常之诗”)中,波旁讲述了他作为一个年轻男孩对诗歌价值的轻视,直到有一天在看一部老电影时,他被“我爱你”这句话打动了。这个普通的短语让他重新考虑构成诗歌的参数,并承认由琐碎的符号构成的短语的形式力量的二分法。第四章(“上皮”)也是基于个人经历。波旁以平淡的断言开场,“我从不喜欢婚礼”(第43页),但他注意到“形式的婚姻”和“亲密和稳定的婚姻”之间的区别:他厌恶的是前者。他相信,成功的婚姻可以成为一首日常的诗——一种权力的事件和“语言代理”——事件本身孕育的意义比文字本身所能承载的意义更多。婚姻可以是一首发现的诗,它源于了解爱的意义的行动。但是,在婚礼的对象和一切陈腐的心形符号、波旁王朝的话语中,找不到诗歌。波旁在第五章(“一首诗和它的词是一样的吗?”)中阐述了他的观点,即一首诗不能完全被它的词或意义所束缚。如果一个人发现一首诗的每一行都是可理解的,那并不表明这首诗的意思必然被理解了。相反,读者可能不完全确定一首诗的意思;言下之意未必能说明问题。在波旁对句子的解释中,他说,一个人必须通过自己的阅读来确定这样一首句子诗是如何有意义的。他声称一首诗不仅仅是它的单词,不能被简化成一组句子或短语。“一首诗,如果是一句话,总是不止于那句话;否则,一首诗就不是一首诗,而是一个句子”(第67页)。波旁的最新出版物挑战传统,长…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: For more than a quarter century, Philosophy and Literature has explored the dialogue between literary and philosophical studies. The journal offers a constant source of fresh, stimulating ideas in the aesthetics of literature, theory of criticism, philosophical interpretation of literature, and literary treatment of philosophy. Philosophy and Literature challenges the cant and pretensions of academic priesthoods by publishing an assortment of lively, wide-ranging essays, notes, and reviews that are written in clear, jargon-free prose. In his regular column, editor Denis Dutton targets the fashions and inanities of contemporary intellectual life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信