Antonios Minas Krasakis, Andrew Yates, Evangelos Kanoulas
{"title":"Contextualizing and Expanding Conversational Queries without Supervision","authors":"Antonios Minas Krasakis, Andrew Yates, Evangelos Kanoulas","doi":"10.1145/3632622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most conversational passage retrieval systems try to resolve conversational dependencies by using an intermediate query resolution step. To do so, they synthesize conversational data or assume the availability of large-scale question rewritting datasets. To relax those conditions, we propose a zero-shot unified resolution–retrieval approach, that (i) contextualizes and (ii) expands query embeddings using the conversation history and without fine-tuning on conversational data. Contextualization biases the last user question embeddings towards the conversation. Query expansion is used in two ways: (i) abstractive expansion generates embeddings based on the current question and previous history, whereas (ii) extractive expansion tries to identify history term embeddings based on attention weights from the retriever. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of both contextualization and unified expansion in improving conversational retrieval. Contextualization does so mostly by resolving anaphoras to the conversation and bringing their embeddings closer to the important resolution terms that were omitted. By adding embeddings to the query, expansion targets phenomena of ellipsis more explicitly, with our analysis verifying its effectiveness on identifying and adding important resolutions to the query. By combining contextualization and expansion, we find that our zero-shot unified resolution–retrieval methods are competitive and can even outperform supervised methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":50936,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Information Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3632622","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Most conversational passage retrieval systems try to resolve conversational dependencies by using an intermediate query resolution step. To do so, they synthesize conversational data or assume the availability of large-scale question rewritting datasets. To relax those conditions, we propose a zero-shot unified resolution–retrieval approach, that (i) contextualizes and (ii) expands query embeddings using the conversation history and without fine-tuning on conversational data. Contextualization biases the last user question embeddings towards the conversation. Query expansion is used in two ways: (i) abstractive expansion generates embeddings based on the current question and previous history, whereas (ii) extractive expansion tries to identify history term embeddings based on attention weights from the retriever. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of both contextualization and unified expansion in improving conversational retrieval. Contextualization does so mostly by resolving anaphoras to the conversation and bringing their embeddings closer to the important resolution terms that were omitted. By adding embeddings to the query, expansion targets phenomena of ellipsis more explicitly, with our analysis verifying its effectiveness on identifying and adding important resolutions to the query. By combining contextualization and expansion, we find that our zero-shot unified resolution–retrieval methods are competitive and can even outperform supervised methods.
期刊介绍:
The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain:
new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation;
observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking;
accounts of applications of existing information retrieval techniques that shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of the techniques;
formalization of new information retrieval or information seeking tasks and of methods for evaluating the performance on those tasks;
development of content (text, image, speech, video, etc) analysis methods to support information retrieval and information seeking;
development of computational models of user information preferences and interaction behaviors;
creation and analysis of evaluation methodologies for information retrieval and information seeking; or
surveys of existing work that propose a significant synthesis.
The information retrieval scope of ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) appeals to industry practitioners for its wealth of creative ideas, and to academic researchers for its descriptions of their colleagues'' work.