Evaluating a hospice program: a practical approach.

S Byrd, K Taylor
{"title":"Evaluating a hospice program: a practical approach.","authors":"S Byrd, K Taylor","doi":"10.1177/104990918900600114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid growth of hospice care in this country has precipitated a need for ensuring quality through administrative program evaluation. Over the past few years a number of studies have been undertaken to evaluate the effects ofhospice care in relation to cost effectiveness, benefit, and utility. The question, \"Is hospice effective?\" is being examined by hospice administrators and researchers. These investigators are beginning to explore what kinds of terminal care interventions, by whom, and in what combinations, work best for particular hospice patients and their families under a specific set of circumstances.1 Studies like the New Haven and St. Christopher's Hospice evaluation have utilized self report questionnaires obtained from patients or their spouses to assess phenomena such as depression, anxiety, and pain in reponse to hospice care interventions.3A4 Other comprehensive evaluations have been attempted through the review of patient records, and personal interviews with staff and families of deceased hospice patients. 5,6 There is a growing need for data that addresses overall hospice program services from a recipient or family perspective. The federal government has identified specific evaluation criteria for hospices choosing to participate in the hospice Medicare benefit. According to the Hospice Conditions of Participation: \"It is anticipated that critiques by patients' families provide a useful means to measure the degree to which patients' symptoms were managed.\" 7 Certainly, program evaluation is desirable and necessary. However, few hospices in this country have the expert knowledge needed to develop complex research designs and methodologies","PeriodicalId":77805,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice care","volume":"6 1","pages":"41-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/104990918900600114","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/104990918900600114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The rapid growth of hospice care in this country has precipitated a need for ensuring quality through administrative program evaluation. Over the past few years a number of studies have been undertaken to evaluate the effects ofhospice care in relation to cost effectiveness, benefit, and utility. The question, "Is hospice effective?" is being examined by hospice administrators and researchers. These investigators are beginning to explore what kinds of terminal care interventions, by whom, and in what combinations, work best for particular hospice patients and their families under a specific set of circumstances.1 Studies like the New Haven and St. Christopher's Hospice evaluation have utilized self report questionnaires obtained from patients or their spouses to assess phenomena such as depression, anxiety, and pain in reponse to hospice care interventions.3A4 Other comprehensive evaluations have been attempted through the review of patient records, and personal interviews with staff and families of deceased hospice patients. 5,6 There is a growing need for data that addresses overall hospice program services from a recipient or family perspective. The federal government has identified specific evaluation criteria for hospices choosing to participate in the hospice Medicare benefit. According to the Hospice Conditions of Participation: "It is anticipated that critiques by patients' families provide a useful means to measure the degree to which patients' symptoms were managed." 7 Certainly, program evaluation is desirable and necessary. However, few hospices in this country have the expert knowledge needed to develop complex research designs and methodologies
评估安宁疗护计划:实用的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信