Faculty perspectives and values toward mathematics and science content information used in teacher preparation admissions processes

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
David Slavit, Amy Roth McDuffie, Nicole Griggs, Dan Goldhaber, Roddy Theobald
{"title":"Faculty perspectives and values toward mathematics and science content information used in teacher preparation admissions processes","authors":"David Slavit, Amy Roth McDuffie, Nicole Griggs, Dan Goldhaber, Roddy Theobald","doi":"10.1111/ssm.12627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative study examines the information collected about applicants to mathematics or science teacher preparation programs (MSTPPs) and how university faculty perceive and value this information in admissions decisions. Based on document review and interviews with MSTPP faculty and admissions directors, we found that broad measures of mathematics and science content background (e.g., achievement test scores, past mathematics and science courses taken) were used more frequently than information on applicants-specific mathematics and science content knowledge and dispositions. In many cases, application components (such as interviews and personal essay statements) were perceived by faculty to be conducive to surfacing applicants-content knowledge and dispositions; however, they were not constructed or employed in a way that afforded the obtainment of this information. We highlight salient examples of MSTPPs-collection and use of information related to mathematics and science and discuss implications for TPP admissions processes.","PeriodicalId":47540,"journal":{"name":"School Science and Mathematics","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Science and Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This qualitative study examines the information collected about applicants to mathematics or science teacher preparation programs (MSTPPs) and how university faculty perceive and value this information in admissions decisions. Based on document review and interviews with MSTPP faculty and admissions directors, we found that broad measures of mathematics and science content background (e.g., achievement test scores, past mathematics and science courses taken) were used more frequently than information on applicants-specific mathematics and science content knowledge and dispositions. In many cases, application components (such as interviews and personal essay statements) were perceived by faculty to be conducive to surfacing applicants-content knowledge and dispositions; however, they were not constructed or employed in a way that afforded the obtainment of this information. We highlight salient examples of MSTPPs-collection and use of information related to mathematics and science and discuss implications for TPP admissions processes.
教师的观点和价值观对数学和科学内容信息在教师准备招生过程中使用
本定性研究考察了收集到的关于数学或科学教师预备课程(MSTPPs)申请者的信息,以及大学教师如何在录取决策中感知和重视这些信息。基于对MSTPP教师和招生主任的文件审查和访谈,我们发现,数学和科学内容背景的广泛衡量标准(例如,成绩考试成绩,过去的数学和科学课程)比申请人特定的数学和科学内容知识和倾向的信息使用得更频繁。在许多情况下,申请的组成部分(如面试和个人论文陈述)被教师认为有助于展示申请人的内容知识和性格;但是,它们的构造或使用方式并不能提供这种信息的获取。我们强调了mstpps的突出例子-收集和使用与数学和科学相关的信息,并讨论了TPP录取过程的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
School Science and Mathematics
School Science and Mathematics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信