Creditor fructus percepit, Sul pegno con patto anticretico

R. Perani
{"title":"Creditor fructus percepit, Sul pegno con patto anticretico","authors":"R. Perani","doi":"10.1163/15718190-20220013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Summary</h2><p>Creditor fructus percepit, <em>On pledge with a</em> pactum antichreticum. – May the pledgee take the benefits of the <em>res</em>? Pledge did not allow it, there would have been theft <em>(furtum usus</em>). In fact, the thing given as pledge was excluded from any economic use. However, Roman law attests an agreement called <styled-content lang=\"el-Grek\" xmlns:dc=\"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/\" xmlns:ifp=\"http://www.ifactory.com/press\">ἀντίχρησις</styled-content>, which allowed the creditor to have the fruits of the <em>res</em>, under some conditions. Among the jurists only Marcianus uses this Greek term (in D.13,7,33 and D.20,1,11,1).</p><p>In this paper, I wish to demonstrate that the antichresis has become part of Roman legal thought. The legal sources attest a late appearance of the antichresis (very late 2nd and early 3rd century <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">AD</span>), but some Severian constitutions suggest that it may already have been known in practice. The Greek word indicated its foreign origin, but Roman jurists called it simply <em>pignus</em>.</p>","PeriodicalId":501512,"journal":{"name":"The Legal History Review","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Legal History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20220013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary

Creditor fructus percepit, On pledge with a pactum antichreticum. – May the pledgee take the benefits of the res? Pledge did not allow it, there would have been theft (furtum usus). In fact, the thing given as pledge was excluded from any economic use. However, Roman law attests an agreement called ἀντίχρησις, which allowed the creditor to have the fruits of the res, under some conditions. Among the jurists only Marcianus uses this Greek term (in D.13,7,33 and D.20,1,11,1).

In this paper, I wish to demonstrate that the antichresis has become part of Roman legal thought. The legal sources attest a late appearance of the antichresis (very late 2nd and early 3rd century AD), but some Severian constitutions suggest that it may already have been known in practice. The Greek word indicated its foreign origin, but Roman jurists called it simply pignus.

债权人弗鲁图斯,在反宗教契约上
债权人物权感知,质押与契约对立。-质权人可否享有保留区的利益?誓言不允许,就会有盗窃(furtum usus)。事实上,作为质押的东西被排除在任何经济用途之外。然而,罗马法证实了一项名为ντ ρησις的协议,该协议允许债权人在某些条件下拥有资源的果实。在法学家中,只有马西亚努斯使用这个希腊术语(在D.13、7、33和D.20、1、11、1)。在这篇文章中,我想要证明的是,反法已经成为罗马法律思想的一部分。法律来源证明了反克里希的出现较晚(公元2世纪末和3世纪初),但一些塞维里亚宪法表明,它可能在实践中已经为人所知。这个希腊词表明了它的外来起源,但罗马法学家称它为pignus。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信