{"title":"The capture of the Ponte: the development of vicarious liability of shipowners and its limitation in Roman-Dutch law","authors":"Tim Lubbers","doi":"10.1163/15718190-20220012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Summary</h2><p>In 1599, Dutch privateer Melchior van den Kerckhoven unlawfully captured the Venetian merchantman <em>Ponte</em>, which resulted in extensive legal proceedings before the Supreme Court of Holland, Zeeland and West-Friesland. The <em>Ponte</em> case soon became the centrepiece for discussions about vicarious liability of shipowners for unlawful acts of their shipmasters, and – more importantly – about limitation of this liability to (the value of) their ship and cargo. Within these discussions, a secondary role was reserved for the case arising from the capture of the French ship <em>Levrette</em> by a Dutch merchantman in 1610. Based on extensive archival research, the present article offers a detailed reconstruction of the facts and proceedings of the <em>Ponte</em> and the <em>Levrette</em> case, and sets out how these cases were employed by Roman-Dutch lawyers to give shape to limited liability of shipowners for unlawful acts of their shipmaster.</p>","PeriodicalId":501512,"journal":{"name":"The Legal History Review","volume":"184 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Legal History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-20220012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Summary
In 1599, Dutch privateer Melchior van den Kerckhoven unlawfully captured the Venetian merchantman Ponte, which resulted in extensive legal proceedings before the Supreme Court of Holland, Zeeland and West-Friesland. The Ponte case soon became the centrepiece for discussions about vicarious liability of shipowners for unlawful acts of their shipmasters, and – more importantly – about limitation of this liability to (the value of) their ship and cargo. Within these discussions, a secondary role was reserved for the case arising from the capture of the French ship Levrette by a Dutch merchantman in 1610. Based on extensive archival research, the present article offers a detailed reconstruction of the facts and proceedings of the Ponte and the Levrette case, and sets out how these cases were employed by Roman-Dutch lawyers to give shape to limited liability of shipowners for unlawful acts of their shipmaster.
1599年,荷兰海盗Melchior van den Kerckhoven非法捕获威尼斯商人Ponte,导致荷兰、泽兰和西弗里斯兰最高法院进行了广泛的法律诉讼。庞特案很快成为讨论船东对其船长的非法行为的替代责任的中心,更重要的是,这种责任限制在他们的船舶和货物的价值上。在这些讨论中,次要的角色被保留给1610年荷兰商人捕获法国船Levrette的案件。基于广泛的档案研究,本文对Ponte和Levrette案件的事实和诉讼程序进行了详细的重建,并阐述了罗马-荷兰律师如何利用这些案件来确定船东对其船长的非法行为的有限责任。