Testing an instrument to measure the BPMS-KM Support Model

Alicia Martin-Navarro, Maria Paula Lechuga Sancho, Jose Aurelio Medina-Garrido
{"title":"Testing an instrument to measure the BPMS-KM Support Model","authors":"Alicia Martin-Navarro, Maria Paula Lechuga Sancho, Jose Aurelio Medina-Garrido","doi":"arxiv-2311.14348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BPMS (Business Process Management System) represents a type of software that\nautomates the organizational processes looking for efficiency. Since the\nknowledge of organizations lies in their processes, it seems probable that a\nBPMS can be used to manage the knowledge applied in these processes. Through\nthe BPMS-KM Support Model, this study aims to determine the reliability and\nvalidity of a 65-item instrument to measure the utility and the use of a BPMS\nfor knowledge management (KM). A questionnaire was sent to 242 BPMS users and\nto determine its validity, a factorial analysis was conducted. The results\nshowed that the measuring instrument is trustworthy and valid. It represents\nimplications for research, since it provides an instrument validated for\nresearch on the success of a BPMS for KM. There would also be practical\nimplications, since managers can evaluate the use of BPMS, in addition to\nautomating processes to manage knowledge.","PeriodicalId":501487,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.14348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BPMS (Business Process Management System) represents a type of software that automates the organizational processes looking for efficiency. Since the knowledge of organizations lies in their processes, it seems probable that a BPMS can be used to manage the knowledge applied in these processes. Through the BPMS-KM Support Model, this study aims to determine the reliability and validity of a 65-item instrument to measure the utility and the use of a BPMS for knowledge management (KM). A questionnaire was sent to 242 BPMS users and to determine its validity, a factorial analysis was conducted. The results showed that the measuring instrument is trustworthy and valid. It represents implications for research, since it provides an instrument validated for research on the success of a BPMS for KM. There would also be practical implications, since managers can evaluate the use of BPMS, in addition to automating processes to manage knowledge.
测试一个测量BPMS-KM支持模型的仪器
BPMS(业务流程管理系统)代表了一种软件,它可以使组织过程自动化,从而提高效率。由于组织的知识存在于其过程中,aBPMS似乎可以用于管理这些过程中应用的知识。通过BPMS-KM支持模型,本研究旨在确定一个65项测量工具的信度和效度,以衡量bpms对知识管理(KM)的效用和使用。对242名BPMS使用者进行问卷调查,并进行因子分析以确定其效度。结果表明,该测量仪器可靠、有效。它代表了研究的简化,因为它提供了一个工具,验证了对知识管理的BPMS的成功研究。这也会有实际意义,因为管理者可以评估BPMS的使用,除了自动化过程来管理知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信